Gut microbiota associated with the mitigation effect of synbiotics on adverse events of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective exploratory study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Takuya Sugimoto, Satomi Atobe, Yukiko Kado, Akira Takahashi, Masaaki Motoori, Keijiro Sugimura, Hiroshi Miyata, Masahiko Yano, Koji Tanaka, Yuichiro Doki, Osamu Shiraishi, Takushi Yasuda, Takashi Asahara
{"title":"Gut microbiota associated with the mitigation effect of synbiotics on adverse events of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: A retrospective exploratory study.","authors":"Takuya Sugimoto,&nbsp;Satomi Atobe,&nbsp;Yukiko Kado,&nbsp;Akira Takahashi,&nbsp;Masaaki Motoori,&nbsp;Keijiro Sugimura,&nbsp;Hiroshi Miyata,&nbsp;Masahiko Yano,&nbsp;Koji Tanaka,&nbsp;Yuichiro Doki,&nbsp;Osamu Shiraishi,&nbsp;Takushi Yasuda,&nbsp;Takashi Asahara","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Our synbiotics (<i>Lacticaseibacillus paracasei</i> strain Shirota, <i>Bifidobacterium breve</i> strain Yakult, and galacto-oligosaccharides: LBG) helps mitigate serious adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) and diarrhoea in oesophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Unfortunately, LBG therapy does not benefit all patients.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> Identification of the gut microbiota species involved in adverse events during chemotherapy could help predict the onset of adverse events. Identification of the gut microbiota that influence the efficacy of LBG could also help establish a diagnostic method to identify patients who will respond to LBG before the initiation of therapy.<b>Aim.</b> To identify the gut microbiota involved in adverse events during NAC and that affect the efficacy of LBG therapy.<b>Methodology.</b> This study was ancillary to a parent randomized controlled trial in which 81 oesophageal cancer patients were recruited and administered either prophylactic antibiotics or LBG combined with enteral nutrition (LBG+EN). The study included 73 of 81 patients from whom faecal samples were collected both before and after NAC. The gut microbiota was analysed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and compared based on the degree of NAC-associated adverse events. Furthermore, the association between the counts of identified bacteria and adverse events and the mitigation effect of LBG+EN was also analysed.<b>Results.</b> The abundance of <i>Anaerostipes hadrus</i> and <i>Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum</i> in patients with no FN or only mild diarrhoea was significantly higher (<i>P</i><0.05) compared to those with FN or severe diarrhoea. Moreover, subgroup analyses of patients receiving LBG+EN showed that the faecal <i>A. hadrus</i> count before NAC was significantly associated with a risk of developing FN (OR, 0.11; 95 % CI, 0.01-0.60, <i>P</i>=0.019). The faecal <i>A. hadrus</i> count after NAC was positively correlated with intestinal concentrations of acetic acid (<i>P</i>=0.0007) and butyric acid (<i>P</i>=0.00005).<b>Conclusion.</b> <i>Anaerostipes hadrus</i> and <i>B. pseudocatenulatum</i> may be involved in the ameliorating adverse events and can thus be used to identify beforehand patients that would benefit from LBG+EN during NAC. These results also suggest that LBG+EN would be useful in the development of measures to prevent adverse events during NAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"72 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. Our synbiotics (Lacticaseibacillus paracasei strain Shirota, Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult, and galacto-oligosaccharides: LBG) helps mitigate serious adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) and diarrhoea in oesophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Unfortunately, LBG therapy does not benefit all patients.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Identification of the gut microbiota species involved in adverse events during chemotherapy could help predict the onset of adverse events. Identification of the gut microbiota that influence the efficacy of LBG could also help establish a diagnostic method to identify patients who will respond to LBG before the initiation of therapy.Aim. To identify the gut microbiota involved in adverse events during NAC and that affect the efficacy of LBG therapy.Methodology. This study was ancillary to a parent randomized controlled trial in which 81 oesophageal cancer patients were recruited and administered either prophylactic antibiotics or LBG combined with enteral nutrition (LBG+EN). The study included 73 of 81 patients from whom faecal samples were collected both before and after NAC. The gut microbiota was analysed using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and compared based on the degree of NAC-associated adverse events. Furthermore, the association between the counts of identified bacteria and adverse events and the mitigation effect of LBG+EN was also analysed.Results. The abundance of Anaerostipes hadrus and Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum in patients with no FN or only mild diarrhoea was significantly higher (P<0.05) compared to those with FN or severe diarrhoea. Moreover, subgroup analyses of patients receiving LBG+EN showed that the faecal A. hadrus count before NAC was significantly associated with a risk of developing FN (OR, 0.11; 95 % CI, 0.01-0.60, P=0.019). The faecal A. hadrus count after NAC was positively correlated with intestinal concentrations of acetic acid (P=0.0007) and butyric acid (P=0.00005).Conclusion. Anaerostipes hadrus and B. pseudocatenulatum may be involved in the ameliorating adverse events and can thus be used to identify beforehand patients that would benefit from LBG+EN during NAC. These results also suggest that LBG+EN would be useful in the development of measures to prevent adverse events during NAC.

肠道菌群与合生剂对食管癌患者新辅助化疗不良事件缓解作用的相关性:一项回顾性探索性研究
介绍。我们的合成制剂(副干酪乳杆菌Shirota菌株、养乐多短双歧杆菌菌株和半乳糖低聚糖:LBG)有助于减轻食管癌患者接受新辅助化疗(NAC)时出现的严重不良事件,如发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)和腹泻。不幸的是,LBG治疗并不是对所有患者都有益。假设/差距语句。确定与化疗期间不良事件相关的肠道菌群有助于预测不良事件的发生。确定影响LBG疗效的肠道微生物群也有助于建立一种诊断方法,在治疗开始前确定对LBG有反应的患者。确定与NAC期间不良事件有关的肠道微生物群,并影响LBG治疗的疗效。该研究是一项随机对照试验的辅助研究,该试验招募了81名食管癌患者,并给予预防性抗生素或LBG联合肠内营养(LBG+EN)。这项研究包括81名患者中的73名,他们在NAC前后都收集了粪便样本。使用16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析肠道微生物群,并根据nac相关不良事件的程度进行比较。此外,还分析了鉴定出的细菌数量与不良事件之间的关系以及LBG+EN的缓解效果。无FN或仅轻度腹泻的患者中,硬厌氧菌和假芽双歧杆菌的丰度明显较高(PA)。NAC前hadrus计数与FN发生风险显著相关(OR, 0.11;95% ci, 0.01-0.60, p =0.019)。NAC后粪便hadrus计数与肠道乙酸浓度(P=0.0007)和丁酸浓度(P=0.00005)呈正相关。硬厌氧菌和假芽孢杆菌可能参与改善不良事件,因此可用于预先识别在NAC期间将受益于LBG+EN的患者。这些结果还表明,LBG+EN将有助于制定预防NAC期间不良事件的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of medical microbiology
Journal of medical microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Microbiology provides comprehensive coverage of medical, dental and veterinary microbiology, and infectious diseases. We welcome everything from laboratory research to clinical trials, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology. We publish articles under the following subject categories: Antimicrobial resistance; Clinical microbiology; Disease, diagnosis and diagnostics; Medical mycology; Molecular and microbial epidemiology; Microbiome and microbial ecology in health; One Health; Pathogenesis, virulence and host response; Prevention, therapy and therapeutics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信