Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
European Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01610-w
Alex Bató, Valentin Brodszky, Ariel Zoltán Mitev, Balázs Jenei, Fanni Rencz
{"title":"Psychometric properties and general population reference values for PROMIS Global Health in Hungary.","authors":"Alex Bató, Valentin Brodszky, Ariel Zoltán Mitev, Balázs Jenei, Fanni Rencz","doi":"10.1007/s10198-023-01610-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) is a widely used generic measure of health status. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Hungarian PROMIS-GH and to (2) develop general population reference values in Hungary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among the Hungarian adult general population (n = 1700). Respondents completed the PROMIS-GH v1.2. Unidimensionality (confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor model), local independence, monotonicity (Mokken scaling), graded response model fit, item characteristic curves and measurement invariance were examined. Spearman's correlations were used to analyse convergent validity of PROMIS-GH subscales with SF-36v1 composites and subscales. Age- and gender-weighted T-scores were computed for the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) subscales using the US item calibrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The item response theory assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence and monotonicity were met for both subscales. The graded response model showed acceptable fit indices for both subscales. No differential item functioning was detected for any sociodemographic characteristics. GMH T-scores showed a strong correlation with SF-36 mental health composite score (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.71) and GPH T-scores with SF-36 physical health composite score (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.83). Mean GPH and GMH T-scores of females were lower (47.8 and 46.4) compared to males (50.5 and 49.3) (p < 0.001), and both mean GPH and GMH T-scores decreased with age, suggesting worse health status (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established the validity and developed general population reference values for the PROMIS-GH in Hungary. Population reference values facilitate the interpretation of patients' scores and allow inter-country comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11136746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01610-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) is a widely used generic measure of health status. This study aimed to (1) assess the psychometric properties of the Hungarian PROMIS-GH and to (2) develop general population reference values in Hungary.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among the Hungarian adult general population (n = 1700). Respondents completed the PROMIS-GH v1.2. Unidimensionality (confirmatory factor analysis and bifactor model), local independence, monotonicity (Mokken scaling), graded response model fit, item characteristic curves and measurement invariance were examined. Spearman's correlations were used to analyse convergent validity of PROMIS-GH subscales with SF-36v1 composites and subscales. Age- and gender-weighted T-scores were computed for the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) subscales using the US item calibrations.

Results: The item response theory assumptions of unidimensionality, local independence and monotonicity were met for both subscales. The graded response model showed acceptable fit indices for both subscales. No differential item functioning was detected for any sociodemographic characteristics. GMH T-scores showed a strong correlation with SF-36 mental health composite score (rs = 0.71) and GPH T-scores with SF-36 physical health composite score (rs = 0.83). Mean GPH and GMH T-scores of females were lower (47.8 and 46.4) compared to males (50.5 and 49.3) (p < 0.001), and both mean GPH and GMH T-scores decreased with age, suggesting worse health status (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This study established the validity and developed general population reference values for the PROMIS-GH in Hungary. Population reference values facilitate the interpretation of patients' scores and allow inter-country comparisons.

Abstract Image

匈牙利 PROMIS Global Health 的心理测量特性和普通人群参考值。
目的:患者报告结果测量信息系统-全球健康(PROMIS-GH)是一种广泛使用的健康状况通用测量方法。本研究旨在:(1)评估匈牙利 PROMIS-GH 的心理测量特性;(2)制定匈牙利普通人群的参考值:对匈牙利成年普通人群(n = 1700)进行了在线横断面调查。受访者填写了 PROMIS-GH v1.2。对单维性(确证因子分析和双因子模型)、局部独立性、单调性(Mokken Scaling)、分级反应模型拟合度、项目特征曲线和测量不变性进行了检验。Spearman 相关性用于分析 PROMIS-GH 子量表与 SF-36v1 复合量表和子量表的收敛效度。使用美国项目校准法计算了全球身体健康(GPH)和全球心理健康(GMH)分量表的年龄和性别加权 T 分数:两个分量表均符合项目反应理论的假设,即单维性、局部独立性和单调性。分级反应模型显示,两个分量表的拟合指数均可接受。没有发现任何社会人口学特征导致的项目功能差异。GMH T 分与 SF-36 心理健康综合得分(rs = 0.71)、GPH T 分与 SF-36 身体健康综合得分(rs = 0.83)具有很强的相关性。与男性(50.5 和 49.3)相比,女性的 GPH 和 GMH T-scores平均值较低(47.8 和 46.4)(P本研究确定了 PROMIS-GH 的有效性,并为匈牙利制定了一般人群参考值。人群参考值有助于解释患者的得分,并可进行国家间比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信