Regulating the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Climate Agreements and Beyond.

IF 1.8 3区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Health Care Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1007/s10728-023-00454-y

Philippe Cullet

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A treaty to regulate the global antimicrobial commons can be appropriately framed around the model provided by multilateral environmental agreements. At the same time, it is not clear that a comprehensive treaty is the only possible entry point and other options, such as an agreement on technology transfer or funding may be apt starting points. Any legal instrument adopted to regulate the global antimicrobial commons needs to reflect the global South-North dichotomy and integrate the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Further, it would need to go beyond environmental instruments that have been structured around the sovereign interests of negotiating states even when dealing with issues of global concern, such as climate change. The proposed legal instrument would also need to be based not just on the precautionary principle as a marker of the necessity to address the negative environmental and health impacts, but also be based on the interests of patients and integrate concerns raised in terms of the human right to health.

查看原文本刊更多论文

调节全球抗微生物公域:气候协议及其他。

可以围绕多边环境协定提供的模式，适当地制定一项规范全球抗微生物公域的条约。与此同时，目前尚不清楚一项全面条约是否是唯一可能的切入点，而诸如关于技术转让或供资的协议等其他选择可能是合适的起点。为规范全球抗微生物公域而通过的任何法律文书都需要反映全球南北二分法，并将共同但有区别的责任原则和各自能力相结合。此外，它还需要超越围绕谈判国主权利益构建的环境工具，即使在处理气候变化等全球关注的问题时也是如此。拟议的法律文书还需要不仅以预防原则为基础，作为必须解决不利的环境和健康影响的标志，而且还需要以患者的利益为基础，并综合在健康权方面提出的关切。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Health Care Analysis Multiple-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.