{"title":"Comparison of regmed and BayesNetty for exploring causal models with many variables","authors":"Richard Howey, Heather J. Cordell","doi":"10.1002/gepi.22532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here we compare a recently proposed method and software package, <span>regmed</span>, with our own previously developed package, BayesNetty, designed to allow exploratory analysis of complex causal relationships between biological variables. We find that \n<span>regmed</span> generally has poorer recall but much better precision than BayesNetty. This is perhaps not too surprising as \n<span>regmed</span> is specifically designed for use with high-dimensional data. BayesNetty is found to be more sensitive to the resulting multiple testing problem encountered in these circumstances. However, as \n<span>regmed</span> is not designed to handle missing data, its performance is severely affected when missing data is present, whereas the performance of BayesNetty is only slightly affected. The performance of \n<span>regmed</span> can be rescued in this situation by first using BayesNetty to impute the missing data, and then applying \n<span>regmed</span> to the resulting “filled-in” data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"47 7","pages":"496-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.22532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.22532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Here we compare a recently proposed method and software package, regmed, with our own previously developed package, BayesNetty, designed to allow exploratory analysis of complex causal relationships between biological variables. We find that
regmed generally has poorer recall but much better precision than BayesNetty. This is perhaps not too surprising as
regmed is specifically designed for use with high-dimensional data. BayesNetty is found to be more sensitive to the resulting multiple testing problem encountered in these circumstances. However, as
regmed is not designed to handle missing data, its performance is severely affected when missing data is present, whereas the performance of BayesNetty is only slightly affected. The performance of
regmed can be rescued in this situation by first using BayesNetty to impute the missing data, and then applying
regmed to the resulting “filled-in” data set.
期刊介绍:
Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations.
Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.