Exploring the impact of the reclassification of a hereditary cancer syndrome gene variant: emerging themes from a qualitative study.

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Laura Wedd, Margaret Gleeson, Bettina Meiser, Rosie O'Shea, Kristine Barlow-Stewart, Amanda B Spurdle, Paul James, Jane Fleming, Cassandra Nichols, Rachel Austin, Elisa Cops, Melissa Monnik, Judy Do, Rajneesh Kaur
{"title":"Exploring the impact of the reclassification of a hereditary cancer syndrome gene variant: emerging themes from a qualitative study.","authors":"Laura Wedd,&nbsp;Margaret Gleeson,&nbsp;Bettina Meiser,&nbsp;Rosie O'Shea,&nbsp;Kristine Barlow-Stewart,&nbsp;Amanda B Spurdle,&nbsp;Paul James,&nbsp;Jane Fleming,&nbsp;Cassandra Nichols,&nbsp;Rachel Austin,&nbsp;Elisa Cops,&nbsp;Melissa Monnik,&nbsp;Judy Do,&nbsp;Rajneesh Kaur","doi":"10.1007/s12687-023-00644-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The complexity of genetic variant interpretation means that a proportion of individuals who undergo genetic testing for a hereditary cancer syndrome will have their test result reclassified over time. Such a reclassification may involve a clinically significant upgrade or downgrade in pathogenicity, which may have significant implications for medical management. To date, few studies have examined the psychosocial impact of a reclassification in a hereditary cancer syndrome context. To address this gap, semi-structured telephone interviews were performed with eighteen individuals who had a BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome-related (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) gene variant reclassified. The interviews were analysed utilising an inductive, qualitative approach and emergent themes were identified by thematic analysis. Variable levels of recall amongst participants were found. Common motivations for initial testing included a significant personal and/or family history of cancer and a desire to \"find an answer\". No individual whose uncertain result was upgraded reported negative psychosocial outcomes; most reported adapting to their reclassified result and appraised their genetic testing experience positively. However, individuals whose likely pathogenic/pathogenic results were downgraded reported feelings of anger, shock and sadness post reclassification, highlighting that additional psychosocial support may be required for some. Genetic counselling issues and recommendations for clinical practice are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10272031/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-023-00644-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The complexity of genetic variant interpretation means that a proportion of individuals who undergo genetic testing for a hereditary cancer syndrome will have their test result reclassified over time. Such a reclassification may involve a clinically significant upgrade or downgrade in pathogenicity, which may have significant implications for medical management. To date, few studies have examined the psychosocial impact of a reclassification in a hereditary cancer syndrome context. To address this gap, semi-structured telephone interviews were performed with eighteen individuals who had a BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome-related (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) gene variant reclassified. The interviews were analysed utilising an inductive, qualitative approach and emergent themes were identified by thematic analysis. Variable levels of recall amongst participants were found. Common motivations for initial testing included a significant personal and/or family history of cancer and a desire to "find an answer". No individual whose uncertain result was upgraded reported negative psychosocial outcomes; most reported adapting to their reclassified result and appraised their genetic testing experience positively. However, individuals whose likely pathogenic/pathogenic results were downgraded reported feelings of anger, shock and sadness post reclassification, highlighting that additional psychosocial support may be required for some. Genetic counselling issues and recommendations for clinical practice are outlined.

探索遗传性癌症综合征基因变异重新分类的影响:来自定性研究的新主题。
基因变异解释的复杂性意味着,一部分接受遗传性癌症综合征基因检测的个体,随着时间的推移,他们的检测结果将被重新分类。这种重新分类可能涉及临床显著的致病性升级或降级,这可能对医疗管理产生重大影响。迄今为止,很少有研究检查了在遗传性癌症综合征背景下重新分类的社会心理影响。为了解决这一差距,对18名BRCA1、BRCA2或Lynch综合征相关(MLH1、MSH2、MSH6或PMS2)基因变异重新分类的个体进行了半结构化电话访谈。访谈采用归纳定性方法进行分析,并通过主题分析确定了紧急主题。在参与者中发现了不同程度的回忆。进行初次检查的常见动机包括有重要的个人和/或家族癌症病史,以及希望“找到答案”。没有不确定结果被升级的个体报告负面的社会心理结果;大多数报告适应了他们重新分类的结果,并积极评价他们的基因检测经验。然而,那些可能的致病/致病结果被降级的个体在重新分类后报告了愤怒、震惊和悲伤的感觉,这强调了一些人可能需要额外的社会心理支持。遗传咨询问题和建议的临床实践概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信