Pushed to the Fringe - The Impact of Vaccine Hesitancy on Children and Families.

Susan E Smith, Nina Sivertsen, Lauren Lines, Anita De Bellis
{"title":"Pushed to the Fringe - The Impact of Vaccine Hesitancy on Children and Families.","authors":"Susan E Smith,&nbsp;Nina Sivertsen,&nbsp;Lauren Lines,&nbsp;Anita De Bellis","doi":"10.1080/24694193.2023.2222815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vaccine hesitancy has been described as any delay or refusal of vaccines despite their availability and is increasing in Australia and other middle to high-income countries. The aim of this study is to gain a deep understanding of the experiences and influences on vaccine hesitant children and their families. A qualitative interview approach was undertaken with vaccine hesitant parents and pregnant women (<i>n</i> = 12). Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on data obtained using the guidelines of Braun and Clarke. Three main themes were identified in this study, including Pushed to the fringe; A culture of Distrust; and Coerced choices. The study revealed that vaccine hesitant parents felt isolated and pushed to the fringe of society. They also expressed dissatisfaction with the Australian \"No Jab - No Pay\" and \"No Jab - No Play\" legislation. This contributed to feelings of marginalization. Participants also cited a breakdown in the therapeutic relationships, which impacted their child's health. Additionally, a lack of sufficient information was received to achieve informed consent. These results suggest that there is a need for enhanced education for some health-care professionals, many of whom have reported being confronted by conversations with vaccine hesitant parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":72655,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","volume":" ","pages":"262-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2023.2222815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy has been described as any delay or refusal of vaccines despite their availability and is increasing in Australia and other middle to high-income countries. The aim of this study is to gain a deep understanding of the experiences and influences on vaccine hesitant children and their families. A qualitative interview approach was undertaken with vaccine hesitant parents and pregnant women (n = 12). Semi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on data obtained using the guidelines of Braun and Clarke. Three main themes were identified in this study, including Pushed to the fringe; A culture of Distrust; and Coerced choices. The study revealed that vaccine hesitant parents felt isolated and pushed to the fringe of society. They also expressed dissatisfaction with the Australian "No Jab - No Pay" and "No Jab - No Play" legislation. This contributed to feelings of marginalization. Participants also cited a breakdown in the therapeutic relationships, which impacted their child's health. Additionally, a lack of sufficient information was received to achieve informed consent. These results suggest that there is a need for enhanced education for some health-care professionals, many of whom have reported being confronted by conversations with vaccine hesitant parents.

被推向边缘——疫苗犹豫对儿童和家庭的影响。
疫苗犹豫被描述为尽管疫苗可用,但仍会延迟或拒绝接种,在澳大利亚和其他中高收入国家,这种情况正在增加。本研究的目的是深入了解对疫苗犹豫不决的儿童及其家庭的经历和影响。对犹豫接种疫苗的父母和孕妇进行了定性访谈(n = 12) 。半结构化访谈是通过电话进行的。根据Braun和Clarke的指导方针,对获得的数据进行了归纳专题分析。本研究确定了三个主要主题,包括被推向边缘;不信任的文化;和强制选择。研究表明,对疫苗犹豫不决的父母感到孤立,被推向社会边缘。他们还对澳大利亚的“不打不付钱”和“不打就不玩”立法表示不满。这导致了边缘化的感觉。参与者还提到了治疗关系的破裂,这影响了他们孩子的健康。此外,收到的资料不足,无法获得知情同意。这些结果表明,有必要加强对一些医疗保健专业人员的教育,其中许多人报告说,他们遇到了与对疫苗犹豫不决的父母的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信