Prehospital care process and hospital outcomes in stroke-code cases: comparison of basic and advance life support ambulance attendance.

Silvia Solà Muñoz, María Del Mar Escudero Campillo, Cristina Soro Borrega, Youcef Azeli, Soledad Querol Gil, Antoni Ruiz, Gemma Albacete, Olga Moreno Peral, Sergi Lluch, Sergio Amaro Delgado, Yolanda Silva Blas, Xabier Urra, Dolores Cocho Calderón, Joan Martí Fàbregas, Marc Ribó Jacobi, Pere Cardona Portela, Francisco Purroy García, Esther Duarte Oller, Verónica Hidalgo Benítez, Alan Flores, Marta Rubiera, Ernest Palomeras, Álvaro García-Tornel, Rosa Suñer Soler, Daniel Vilar Roquet, Mercè Salvat-Plana, Anna Ramos Pachón, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa Herrero, Xavier Jiménez Fàbrega
{"title":"Prehospital care process and hospital outcomes in stroke-code cases: comparison of basic and advance life support ambulance attendance.","authors":"Silvia Solà Muñoz, María Del Mar Escudero Campillo, Cristina Soro Borrega, Youcef Azeli, Soledad Querol Gil, Antoni Ruiz, Gemma Albacete, Olga Moreno Peral, Sergi Lluch, Sergio Amaro Delgado, Yolanda Silva Blas, Xabier Urra, Dolores Cocho Calderón, Joan Martí Fàbregas, Marc Ribó Jacobi, Pere Cardona Portela, Francisco Purroy García, Esther Duarte Oller, Verónica Hidalgo Benítez, Alan Flores, Marta Rubiera, Ernest Palomeras, Álvaro García-Tornel, Rosa Suñer Soler, Daniel Vilar Roquet, Mercè Salvat-Plana, Anna Ramos Pachón, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa Herrero, Xavier Jiménez Fàbrega","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study prehospital care process in relation to hospital outcomes in stroke-code cases first attended by 2 different levels of ambulance. To analyze factors associated with a satisfactory functional outcome at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. All stroke-code cases attended by prehospital emergency services from January 2016 to April 2022 were included. Prehospital and hospital variables were collected. The classificatory variable was type of ambulance attending (basic vs advanced life support). The main outcome variables were mortality and functional status after ischemic strokes in patients who underwent reperfusion treatment 90 days after the ischemic episode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 22 968 stroke-code activations, ischemic stroke was diagnosed in 12 467 patients (54.3%) whose functional status was good before the episode. Basic ambulances attended 93.1%; an advanced ambulance was ordered in 1.6% of the patients. Even though there were differences in patient and clinical characteristics recorded during the prehospital process, type of ambulance was not independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.1; 95% CI, 0.77-1.59) or functional status at 3 months (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0,72-1,47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The percentage of patient complications in stroke-code cases attended by basic ambulance teams is low. Type of ambulance responding was not associated with either mortality or functional outcome at 3 months in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 3","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To study prehospital care process in relation to hospital outcomes in stroke-code cases first attended by 2 different levels of ambulance. To analyze factors associated with a satisfactory functional outcome at 3 months.

Material and methods: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. All stroke-code cases attended by prehospital emergency services from January 2016 to April 2022 were included. Prehospital and hospital variables were collected. The classificatory variable was type of ambulance attending (basic vs advanced life support). The main outcome variables were mortality and functional status after ischemic strokes in patients who underwent reperfusion treatment 90 days after the ischemic episode.

Results: Out of 22 968 stroke-code activations, ischemic stroke was diagnosed in 12 467 patients (54.3%) whose functional status was good before the episode. Basic ambulances attended 93.1%; an advanced ambulance was ordered in 1.6% of the patients. Even though there were differences in patient and clinical characteristics recorded during the prehospital process, type of ambulance was not independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.1; 95% CI, 0.77-1.59) or functional status at 3 months (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0,72-1,47).

Conclusion: The percentage of patient complications in stroke-code cases attended by basic ambulance teams is low. Type of ambulance responding was not associated with either mortality or functional outcome at 3 months in this study.

中风代码病例的院前护理过程和住院结果:基本生命支持和高级生命支持救护车出诊的比较。
目的研究由两种不同级别救护车首次接诊的中风代码病例的院前护理过程与住院结果的关系。分析3个月后获得满意功能结果的相关因素:前瞻性多中心观察队列研究。纳入2016年1月至2022年4月院前急救服务接诊的所有卒中病例。收集院前和医院变量。分类变量为救护车类型(基本生命支持与高级生命支持)。主要结果变量是缺血性脑卒中患者在缺血发作 90 天后接受再灌注治疗后的死亡率和功能状态:结果:在 22 968 次卒中代码激活中,12 467 名患者(54.3%)被诊断为缺血性卒中,这些患者在发病前功能状况良好。93.1%的患者得到了基本救护车的救治;1.6%的患者得到了高级救护车的救治。尽管院前过程中记录的患者和临床特征存在差异,但救护车类型与死亡率(调整后的比值比 [aOR],1.1;95% CI,0.77-1.59)或 3 个月时的功能状态(aOR,1.05;95% CI,0.72-1.47)并无独立关联:结论:由基本救护团队接诊的卒中代码病例中患者并发症的比例较低。结论:由基本救护小组接诊的卒中代码病例中出现并发症的比例较低,救护类型与 3 个月后的死亡率或功能状况无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信