Momodou L Jammeh, Julia Suggs, George L Adams, Ehrin J Armstrong, Jihad Mustapha, Mohamed A Zayed
{"title":"Outcomes of Orbital Atherectomy in Patients with Critical Limb Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes.","authors":"Momodou L Jammeh, Julia Suggs, George L Adams, Ehrin J Armstrong, Jihad Mustapha, Mohamed A Zayed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with diabetes and critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significantly higher risk of limb loss and death. Here we evaluate the outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of CLTI in patients with and without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of the LIBERTY 360 study was performed to evaluate baseline demographics, and peri-procedural outcomes between patients with CLTI, and with and without diabetes. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox regression to examine the impact of OA in patients with diabetes and CLTI over a 3-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 289 patients (201 with diabetes, 88 without diabetes) with Rutherford classification 4-6 were included. Patients with diabetes had higher proportion of renal disease (48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002), prior minor/major limb amputation (26% vs 8%, p<0.005), and presence of wounds (63.2% vs 48.9%, p=0.027). Operative times, radiation dosage, and contrast volume were similar between groups. The rate of distal embolization was higher in patients with diabetes (7.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.01; OR 4.33 [0.99, 18.88], p=0.05). However, at 3-years post-procedure, patients with diabetes had no differences in freedom from target vessel/lesion revascularization (HR 1.09, p=0.73), major adverse events (MAE; HR 1.25, p=0.36), major target limb amputation (HR 1.74, p=0.39), and death (HR 1.11, p=0.72).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LIBERTY 360 observed high limb preservation and low MAEs in patients with diabetes and CLTI. Higher distal embolization was observed with OA in patients with diabetes, but OR did not indicate a significant difference in risk between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73697,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","volume":"2 2","pages":"E29-E37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103796/pdf/nihms-1888830.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical limb ischemia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with diabetes and critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) are at significantly higher risk of limb loss and death. Here we evaluate the outcomes of orbital atherectomy (OA) for treatment of CLTI in patients with and without diabetes.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of the LIBERTY 360 study was performed to evaluate baseline demographics, and peri-procedural outcomes between patients with CLTI, and with and without diabetes. Hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox regression to examine the impact of OA in patients with diabetes and CLTI over a 3-year follow-up.
Results: A total of 289 patients (201 with diabetes, 88 without diabetes) with Rutherford classification 4-6 were included. Patients with diabetes had higher proportion of renal disease (48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002), prior minor/major limb amputation (26% vs 8%, p<0.005), and presence of wounds (63.2% vs 48.9%, p=0.027). Operative times, radiation dosage, and contrast volume were similar between groups. The rate of distal embolization was higher in patients with diabetes (7.8% vs 1.9%, p=0.01; OR 4.33 [0.99, 18.88], p=0.05). However, at 3-years post-procedure, patients with diabetes had no differences in freedom from target vessel/lesion revascularization (HR 1.09, p=0.73), major adverse events (MAE; HR 1.25, p=0.36), major target limb amputation (HR 1.74, p=0.39), and death (HR 1.11, p=0.72).
Conclusion: The LIBERTY 360 observed high limb preservation and low MAEs in patients with diabetes and CLTI. Higher distal embolization was observed with OA in patients with diabetes, but OR did not indicate a significant difference in risk between groups.
目的:糖尿病合并严重肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)患者肢体丧失和死亡的风险显著增高。在这里,我们评估了眼眶动脉粥样硬化切除术(OA)治疗伴有和不伴有糖尿病的CLTI患者的结果。方法:对LIBERTY 360研究进行回顾性分析,以评估CLTI患者、合并和不合并糖尿病患者之间的基线人口统计学和围手术期结局。在3年的随访中,采用Cox回归法确定OA对糖尿病和CLTI患者的影响。结果:共纳入Rutherford分类4-6的289例患者(糖尿病201例,非糖尿病88例)。糖尿病患者有较高比例的肾脏疾病(48.3% vs 28.4%, p=0.002),既往的小/大截肢(26% vs 8%)。结论:LIBERTY 360观察到糖尿病和CLTI患者的肢体保留率高,MAEs低。糖尿病OA患者远端栓塞率较高,但OR未显示组间风险有显著差异。