Point-of-Care-ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review of assessment methods.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Celina DeBiasio, Paul Pageau, Allan Shefrin, Michael Y Woo, Warren J Cheung
{"title":"Point-of-Care-ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review of assessment methods.","authors":"Celina DeBiasio,&nbsp;Paul Pageau,&nbsp;Allan Shefrin,&nbsp;Michael Y Woo,&nbsp;Warren J Cheung","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00325-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-Care-Ultrasound (POCUS) curricula have rapidly expanded in undergraduate medical education (UME). However, the assessments used in UME remain variable without national standards. This scoping review characterizes and categorizes current assessment methods using Miller's pyramid for skills, performance, and competence of POCUS in UME. A structured protocol was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A literature search of MEDLINE was performed from January 1, 2010, to June 15, 2021. Two independent reviewers screened all titles and abstracts for articles that met inclusion criteria. The authors included all POCUS UME publications in which POCUS-related knowledge, skills, or competence were taught and objectively assessed. Articles were excluded if there were no assessment methods used, if they exclusively used self-assessment of learned skills, were duplicate articles, or were summaries of other literature. Full text analysis and data extraction of included articles were performed by two independent reviewers. A consensus-based approach was used to categorize data and a thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 643 articles were retrieved and 157 articles met inclusion criteria for full review. Most articles (n = 132; 84%) used technical skill assessments including objective structured clinical examinations (n = 27; 17%), and/or other technical skill-based formats including image acquisition (n = 107; 68%). Retention was assessed in n = 98 (62%) studies. One or more levels of Miller's pyramid were included in 72 (46%) articles. A total of four articles (2.5%) assessed for students' integration of the skill into medical decision making and daily practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate a lack of clinical assessment in UME POCUS that focus on integration of skills in daily clinical practice of medical students corresponding to the highest level of Miller's Pyramid. There exists opportunities to develop and integrate assessment that evaluate higher level competencies of POCUS skills of medical students. A mixture of assessment methods that correspond to multiple levels of Miller's pyramid should be used to best assess POCUS competence in UME.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258183/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00325-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Point-of-Care-Ultrasound (POCUS) curricula have rapidly expanded in undergraduate medical education (UME). However, the assessments used in UME remain variable without national standards. This scoping review characterizes and categorizes current assessment methods using Miller's pyramid for skills, performance, and competence of POCUS in UME. A structured protocol was developed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A literature search of MEDLINE was performed from January 1, 2010, to June 15, 2021. Two independent reviewers screened all titles and abstracts for articles that met inclusion criteria. The authors included all POCUS UME publications in which POCUS-related knowledge, skills, or competence were taught and objectively assessed. Articles were excluded if there were no assessment methods used, if they exclusively used self-assessment of learned skills, were duplicate articles, or were summaries of other literature. Full text analysis and data extraction of included articles were performed by two independent reviewers. A consensus-based approach was used to categorize data and a thematic analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 643 articles were retrieved and 157 articles met inclusion criteria for full review. Most articles (n = 132; 84%) used technical skill assessments including objective structured clinical examinations (n = 27; 17%), and/or other technical skill-based formats including image acquisition (n = 107; 68%). Retention was assessed in n = 98 (62%) studies. One or more levels of Miller's pyramid were included in 72 (46%) articles. A total of four articles (2.5%) assessed for students' integration of the skill into medical decision making and daily practice.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate a lack of clinical assessment in UME POCUS that focus on integration of skills in daily clinical practice of medical students corresponding to the highest level of Miller's Pyramid. There exists opportunities to develop and integrate assessment that evaluate higher level competencies of POCUS skills of medical students. A mixture of assessment methods that correspond to multiple levels of Miller's pyramid should be used to best assess POCUS competence in UME.

本科医学教育中的护理点超声:评估方法的范围审查。
背景:在本科医学教育(UME)中,护理点超声(POCUS)课程迅速扩展。然而,在没有国家标准的情况下,UME使用的评估仍然是可变的。这个范围审查的特点和分类目前的评估方法使用米勒金字塔的技能,性能和能力的POCUS在UME。使用系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)制定了结构化协议。从2010年1月1日至2021年6月15日在MEDLINE进行文献检索。两名独立审稿人筛选了所有符合纳入标准的文章标题和摘要。作者纳入了所有POCUS UME出版物,其中教授和客观评估了POCUS相关的知识、技能或能力。如果没有使用评估方法,如果它们专门使用学习技能的自我评估,如果是重复的文章,或者是其他文献的摘要,则排除文章。纳入文章的全文分析和数据提取由两名独立审稿人完成。采用基于共识的方法对数据进行分类,并进行了专题分析。结果:共检索到643篇文献,157篇符合纳入标准。大多数文章(n = 132;84%)采用技术技能评估,包括客观结构化临床检查(n = 27;17%),和/或其他基于技能的技术格式,包括图像采集(n = 107;68%)。在n = 98(62%)项研究中评估了保留率。72篇(46%)文章中包含了米勒金字塔的一个或多个层次。共有四篇文章(2.5%)评估了学生将技能融入医疗决策和日常实践的情况。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在UME POCUS中缺乏临床评估,这些评估侧重于医学生在日常临床实践中与米勒金字塔最高水平相对应的技能整合。有机会发展和整合评估,以评估医学生的POCUS技能的更高水平能力。应使用与米勒金字塔的多个层次相对应的混合评估方法来最好地评估POCUS在UME中的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信