Machine annealing-guided navigation of antihypertensive food peptide selectivity between human ACE N- and C-domains in structurally interacting diversity space
Li Mei, Shuyong Shang, Shaozhou Wang, Haiyang Ye, Peng Zhou
{"title":"Machine annealing-guided navigation of antihypertensive food peptide selectivity between human ACE N- and C-domains in structurally interacting diversity space","authors":"Li Mei, Shuyong Shang, Shaozhou Wang, Haiyang Ye, Peng Zhou","doi":"10.1002/jmr.3014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a well-established druggable target for the treatment of hypertension (HTN), which contains two structurally homologous but functionally distinct N- and C-domains. Selective inhibition of the C-domain primarily contributes to the antihypertensive efficiency and can be exploited as medicinal agents and functional additives for regulating blood pressure with high safety. In this study, we used a machine annealing (MA) strategy to guide the navigation of antihypertensive peptides (AHPs) in structurally interacting diversity space with the two ACE domains based on their crystal/modeled complex structures and an in-house protein-peptide affinity scoring function, aiming to optimize the peptide selectivity for C-domain over N-domain. The strategy generated a panel of theoretically designed AHP hits with a satisfactory C-over-N (C > N) selectivity profile, from which several hits were found to have a good C > N selectivity, which is roughly comparable with or even better than the BPPb, a natural C > N-selective ACE-inhibitory peptide. Structural analysis and comparison of domain-peptide noncovalent interaction patterns revealed that (i) longer peptides (>4 amino aids) generally exhibit stronger selectivity than shorter peptides (<4 amino aids), (ii) peptide sequence can be divided into two, section I (including peptide C-terminal region) and section II (including peptide middle and N-terminal regions); the former contributes to both peptide affinity (primarily) and selectivity (secondarily), while the latter is almost only responsible for peptide selectivity, and (iii) charged/polar amino acids confer to peptide selectivity relative to hydrophobic/nonpolar amino acids (that confer to peptide affinity).</p>","PeriodicalId":16531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","volume":"36 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmr.3014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Human angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a well-established druggable target for the treatment of hypertension (HTN), which contains two structurally homologous but functionally distinct N- and C-domains. Selective inhibition of the C-domain primarily contributes to the antihypertensive efficiency and can be exploited as medicinal agents and functional additives for regulating blood pressure with high safety. In this study, we used a machine annealing (MA) strategy to guide the navigation of antihypertensive peptides (AHPs) in structurally interacting diversity space with the two ACE domains based on their crystal/modeled complex structures and an in-house protein-peptide affinity scoring function, aiming to optimize the peptide selectivity for C-domain over N-domain. The strategy generated a panel of theoretically designed AHP hits with a satisfactory C-over-N (C > N) selectivity profile, from which several hits were found to have a good C > N selectivity, which is roughly comparable with or even better than the BPPb, a natural C > N-selective ACE-inhibitory peptide. Structural analysis and comparison of domain-peptide noncovalent interaction patterns revealed that (i) longer peptides (>4 amino aids) generally exhibit stronger selectivity than shorter peptides (<4 amino aids), (ii) peptide sequence can be divided into two, section I (including peptide C-terminal region) and section II (including peptide middle and N-terminal regions); the former contributes to both peptide affinity (primarily) and selectivity (secondarily), while the latter is almost only responsible for peptide selectivity, and (iii) charged/polar amino acids confer to peptide selectivity relative to hydrophobic/nonpolar amino acids (that confer to peptide affinity).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Molecular Recognition (JMR) publishes original research papers and reviews describing substantial advances in our understanding of molecular recognition phenomena in life sciences, covering all aspects from biochemistry, molecular biology, medicine, and biophysics. The research may employ experimental, theoretical and/or computational approaches.
The focus of the journal is on recognition phenomena involving biomolecules and their biological / biochemical partners rather than on the recognition of metal ions or inorganic compounds. Molecular recognition involves non-covalent specific interactions between two or more biological molecules, molecular aggregates, cellular modules or organelles, as exemplified by receptor-ligand, antigen-antibody, nucleic acid-protein, sugar-lectin, to mention just a few of the possible interactions. The journal invites manuscripts that aim to achieve a complete description of molecular recognition mechanisms between well-characterized biomolecules in terms of structure, dynamics and biological activity. Such studies may help the future development of new drugs and vaccines, although the experimental testing of new drugs and vaccines falls outside the scope of the journal. Manuscripts that describe the application of standard approaches and techniques to design or model new molecular entities or to describe interactions between biomolecules, but do not provide new insights into molecular recognition processes will not be considered. Similarly, manuscripts involving biomolecules uncharacterized at the sequence level (e.g. calf thymus DNA) will not be considered.