Implementation of ED I-PASS as a Standardized Handoff Tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evan Yanni, Sharon Calaman, Ethan Wiener, Jeffrey S Fine, Selin T Sagalowsky
{"title":"Implementation of ED I-PASS as a Standardized Handoff Tool in the Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Evan Yanni,&nbsp;Sharon Calaman,&nbsp;Ethan Wiener,&nbsp;Jeffrey S Fine,&nbsp;Selin T Sagalowsky","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Communication, failures during patient handoffs are a significant cause of medical error. There is a paucity of data on standardized handoff tools for intershift transitions of care in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to improve handoffs between PEM attending physicians (i.e., supervising physicians ultimately responsible for patient care) through the implementation of a modified I-PASS tool (ED I-PASS). Our aims were to: (1) increase the proportion of physicians using ED I-PASS by two-thirds and (2) decrease the proportion reporting information loss during shift change by one-third, over a 6-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After literature and stakeholder review, Expected Disposition, Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situational Awareness, Synthesis by Receiver (ED I-PASS) was implemented using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, incorporating: trained \"super-users\"; print and electronic cognitive support tools; direct observation; and general and targeted feedback. Implementation occurred from September to April of 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when patient volumes were significantly lower than prepandemic levels. Data from observed handoffs were collected for process outcomes. Surveys regarding handoff practices were distributed before and after ED I-PASS implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>82.8% of participants completed follow-up surveys, and 69.6% of PEM physicians were observed performing a handoff. Use of ED I-PASS increased from 7.1% to 87.5% ( p < .001) and the reported perceived loss of important patient information during transitions of care decreased 50%, from 75.0% to 37.5% ( p = .02). Most (76.0%) participants reported satisfaction with ED I-PASS, despite half citing a perceived increase in handoff length. 54.2% reported a concurrent increase in written handoff documentation during the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ED I-PASS can be successfully implemented among attending physicians in the pediatric emergency department setting. Its use resulted in significant decreases in reported perceived loss of patient information during intershift handoffs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 3","pages":"140-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Communication, failures during patient handoffs are a significant cause of medical error. There is a paucity of data on standardized handoff tools for intershift transitions of care in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) initiative was to improve handoffs between PEM attending physicians (i.e., supervising physicians ultimately responsible for patient care) through the implementation of a modified I-PASS tool (ED I-PASS). Our aims were to: (1) increase the proportion of physicians using ED I-PASS by two-thirds and (2) decrease the proportion reporting information loss during shift change by one-third, over a 6-month period.

Methods: After literature and stakeholder review, Expected Disposition, Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situational Awareness, Synthesis by Receiver (ED I-PASS) was implemented using iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, incorporating: trained "super-users"; print and electronic cognitive support tools; direct observation; and general and targeted feedback. Implementation occurred from September to April of 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when patient volumes were significantly lower than prepandemic levels. Data from observed handoffs were collected for process outcomes. Surveys regarding handoff practices were distributed before and after ED I-PASS implementation.

Results: 82.8% of participants completed follow-up surveys, and 69.6% of PEM physicians were observed performing a handoff. Use of ED I-PASS increased from 7.1% to 87.5% ( p < .001) and the reported perceived loss of important patient information during transitions of care decreased 50%, from 75.0% to 37.5% ( p = .02). Most (76.0%) participants reported satisfaction with ED I-PASS, despite half citing a perceived increase in handoff length. 54.2% reported a concurrent increase in written handoff documentation during the intervention.

Conclusion: ED I-PASS can be successfully implemented among attending physicians in the pediatric emergency department setting. Its use resulted in significant decreases in reported perceived loss of patient information during intershift handoffs.

ED I-PASS作为儿科急诊科标准化交接工具的实施。
简介:病人交接过程中的沟通失败是导致医疗差错的重要原因。目前缺乏关于儿科急诊医学(PEM)轮班间护理的标准化交接工具的数据。这项质量改进(QI)计划的目的是通过改进I-PASS工具(ED I-PASS)的实施,改善PEM主治医生(即监督最终负责患者护理的医生)之间的交接。我们的目标是:(1)在6个月的时间里,将使用ED I-PASS的医生比例提高三分之二,(2)将轮班期间报告信息丢失的比例降低三分之一。方法:经过文献和利益相关者的审查,预期处置、疾病严重程度、患者总结、行动清单、态势感知、接收者综合(ED I-PASS)采用迭代的计划-执行-研究-行动周期实施,包括:训练有素的“超级用户”;印刷和电子认知支持工具;直接观察;和一般的和有针对性的反馈。实施于2021年9月至4月,当时正值COVID-19大流行高峰期,患者人数显著低于大流行前的水平。从观察到的交接中收集数据作为过程结果。在ED I-PASS实施前后分发了关于移交实践的调查。结果:82.8%的参与者完成了随访调查,69.6%的PEM医生进行了交接。ED I-PASS的使用率从7.1%增加到87.5% (p < 0.001),在护理过渡期间报告的重要患者信息丢失减少了50%,从75.0%减少到37.5% (p = .02)。大多数(76.0%)的参与者对ED I-PASS表示满意,尽管有一半的人认为交接时间增加了。在干预期间,54.2%的人报告书面移交文件同时增加。结论:ED I-PASS可在儿科急诊科主治医师中成功实施。它的使用导致在轮班交接期间报告的患者信息丢失显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信