The Willingness to Intervene Against Suicide Enhanced Questionnaire.

IF 3 3区医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Health Communication Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2023.2227435

Rosalie S Aldrich, Julie Cerel

{"title":"The Willingness to Intervene Against Suicide Enhanced Questionnaire.","authors":"Rosalie S Aldrich, Julie Cerel","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2023.2227435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Willingness to Intervene against Suicide Enhanced (WISE) questionnaire. The WISE is a revised version of the Willingness to Intervene against Suicide (WIS) questionnaire, which was based on the theory of planned behavior, and it has consistently predicted the intention to intervene with a suicidal individual. Evaluation of the WIS showed that it was internally consistent with adequate goodness-of-fit indices for three of the four scales. The subjective norms scale did not meet the goodness-of-fit indices standard cutoff criteria. Due to this, the WIS questionnaire has been revised into the WISE. However, the dimensionality of these factors needed to be tested. College students (n = 824) completed an online survey to test the WISE. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and multiple regression. The WISE was internally consistent, and the scales met acceptable criteria for goodness-of-fit indices. The WISE explained a range of variance in participants' intention to intervene from 12 to 40%.","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2227435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Willingness to Intervene against Suicide Enhanced (WISE) questionnaire. The WISE is a revised version of the Willingness to Intervene against Suicide (WIS) questionnaire, which was based on the theory of planned behavior, and it has consistently predicted the intention to intervene with a suicidal individual. Evaluation of the WIS showed that it was internally consistent with adequate goodness-of-fit indices for three of the four scales. The subjective norms scale did not meet the goodness-of-fit indices standard cutoff criteria. Due to this, the WIS questionnaire has been revised into the WISE. However, the dimensionality of these factors needed to be tested. College students (n = 824) completed an online survey to test the WISE. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and multiple regression. The WISE was internally consistent, and the scales met acceptable criteria for goodness-of-fit indices. The WISE explained a range of variance in participants' intention to intervene from 12 to 40%.

查看原文本刊更多论文

干预自杀意愿强化问卷。

本研究的目的是测试增强型自杀干预意愿（WISE）问卷的可靠性和有效性。WISE 是以计划行为理论为基础的 "干预自杀意愿"（WIS）问卷的修订版，可持续预测对有自杀倾向者进行干预的意愿。对 WIS 的评估表明，它在四个量表中的三个量表具有充分的拟合优度指数，内部一致性良好。主观规范量表不符合拟合优度指数的标准临界值。因此，WIS 问卷被修订为 WISE 问卷。然而，这些因子的维度需要进行测试。大学生（n = 824）完成了一项在线调查，以测试 WISE。我们使用确认性因子分析、可靠性分析和多元回归法对数据进行了分析。WISE 具有内部一致性，量表的拟合优度指数符合可接受的标准。WISE 解释了参与者干预意向中 12% 到 40% 的差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Health Communication Multiple-

CiteScore

8.20

自引率

10.30%

发文量

184

期刊介绍： As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.