Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection After Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lung Transplant Recipients.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1177/08971900231184308
Stacy R Fredrick, Carlo J Iasella, Lauren M Sacha, Ryan M Rivosecchi, Matthew R Morrell, Pablo G Sanchez, Joseph M Pilewski, Mark E Snyder, John F McDyer, Cody A Moore
{"title":"Incidence of Acute Cellular Rejection After Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lung Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Stacy R Fredrick, Carlo J Iasella, Lauren M Sacha, Ryan M Rivosecchi, Matthew R Morrell, Pablo G Sanchez, Joseph M Pilewski, Mark E Snyder, John F McDyer, Cody A Moore","doi":"10.1177/08971900231184308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNeutropenia is a common complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Filgrastim may be used to treat neutropenia in LTRs, but its consequences on acute cellular rejection (ACR) remain controversial. <b>Objective:</b> The purpose was to examine the association between filgrastim and incidence of ACR 6 months after filgrastim administration in LTRs. Secondary outcomes included burden of ACR, infections, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival. <b>Methods:</b> This was a matched cohort study of patients transplanted between January 2010 and October 2019. LTRs who received filgrastim for neutropenia were compared to a cohort who did not. LTRs were matched on transplant indication, sex, age, and time post-transplant and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of ACR. <b>Results:</b> 212 patients were included in the analysis (106 in each group). 50 patients (47.2%) in the filgrastim group experienced ACR compared to 37 patients (34.9%) in the no filgrastim group (<i>P</i> = .070). In multivariable analysis, filgrastim use was not associated with ACR at 6 months (OR 1.409, 95% CI 0.772-2.571). Time to first ACR was shorter (<i>P</i> = .049) and 6-month ACR score was higher in the filgrastim group (.49 vs .33, <i>P</i> = .047). LTRs in the filgrastim group had higher incidence of bacterial pneumonia and 1-year mortality. <b>Conclusions:</b> Although not associated with increased likelihood of ACR at 6 months, our study found that filgrastim is associated with increased ACR burden and decreased time to ACR. This study can help inform clinicians of ACR risk after filgrastim use in LTRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900231184308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNeutropenia is a common complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Filgrastim may be used to treat neutropenia in LTRs, but its consequences on acute cellular rejection (ACR) remain controversial. Objective: The purpose was to examine the association between filgrastim and incidence of ACR 6 months after filgrastim administration in LTRs. Secondary outcomes included burden of ACR, infections, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival. Methods: This was a matched cohort study of patients transplanted between January 2010 and October 2019. LTRs who received filgrastim for neutropenia were compared to a cohort who did not. LTRs were matched on transplant indication, sex, age, and time post-transplant and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the likelihood of ACR. Results: 212 patients were included in the analysis (106 in each group). 50 patients (47.2%) in the filgrastim group experienced ACR compared to 37 patients (34.9%) in the no filgrastim group (P = .070). In multivariable analysis, filgrastim use was not associated with ACR at 6 months (OR 1.409, 95% CI 0.772-2.571). Time to first ACR was shorter (P = .049) and 6-month ACR score was higher in the filgrastim group (.49 vs .33, P = .047). LTRs in the filgrastim group had higher incidence of bacterial pneumonia and 1-year mortality. Conclusions: Although not associated with increased likelihood of ACR at 6 months, our study found that filgrastim is associated with increased ACR burden and decreased time to ACR. This study can help inform clinicians of ACR risk after filgrastim use in LTRs.

肺移植受者使用粒细胞集落刺激因子后急性细胞排斥反应的发生率
背景中性粒细胞减少症是肺移植受者(LTR)常见的并发症。菲格司汀可用于治疗肺移植受者的中性粒细胞减少症,但其对急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)的影响仍存在争议。研究目的目的:研究LTR患者服用菲格司汀6个月后,菲格司汀与ACR发生率之间的关系。次要结果包括 ACR 负担、感染、慢性肺移植功能障碍(CLAD)和存活率。研究方法这是一项配对队列研究,研究对象为2010年1月至2019年10月期间移植的患者。将因中性粒细胞减少而接受非格司亭治疗的肺移植患者与未接受非格司亭治疗的患者进行比较。LTR根据移植适应症、性别、年龄和移植后时间进行匹配,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估发生ACR的可能性。结果:212 名患者被纳入分析(每组 106 人)。丝裂霉素组有50名患者(47.2%)出现ACR,而无丝裂霉素组有37名患者(34.9%)出现ACR(P = .070)。在多变量分析中,使用非格司亭与6个月时的ACR无关(OR 1.409,95% CI 0.772-2.571)。非格司亭组患者首次出现 ACR 的时间更短(P = 0.049),6 个月 ACR 评分更高(0.49 vs 0.33,P = 0.047)。非格司亭组的 LTR 患者细菌性肺炎发病率和 1 年死亡率较高。结论:我们的研究发现,尽管非格司亭与 6 个月后发生 ACR 的可能性增加无关,但它与 ACR 负担增加和发生 ACR 的时间缩短有关。这项研究有助于临床医生了解 LTR 使用非格司亭后的 ACR 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信