{"title":"Comparison of Traditional Radiomics, Deep Learning Radiomics and Fusion Methods for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction in Breast Cancer","authors":"Xue Li MS , Lifeng Yang PhD , Xiong Jiao PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2022.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><p>Accurate identification of axillary lymph node<span><span> (ALN) status in breast cancer patients is important for determining treatment options and avoiding axillary overtreatments. Our study aims to comprehensively compare the performance of the traditional </span>radiomics model, deep learning radiomics model, and the fusion models in evaluating breast cancer ALN status based on dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) images.</span></p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>The handcrafted radiomics features and deep features were extracted from 3062 DCE-MRI images. The feature selection was performed by applying mutual information and feature recursive elimination algorithms. The traditional radiomics model and deep learning radiomics model were built using the optimal features and machine learning classifiers, respectively. The fusion models for distinguishing axillary lymph node status were constructed using two fusion strategies. The performance of the models with MRI-reported lymphadenopathy or suspicious nodes to evaluate axillary lymph node status was also compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The decision fusion model, with the integration of the radiomics features and deep learning features at the decision level, achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.879-0.937), which was higher than that of the traditional radiomics model and deep learning radiomics model. The results of the decision fusion model with clinical characteristic yielded an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.899-0.951), which was also superior to other models incorporating clinical characteristic.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the fusion models for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"30 7","pages":"Pages 1281-1287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633222005712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives
Accurate identification of axillary lymph node (ALN) status in breast cancer patients is important for determining treatment options and avoiding axillary overtreatments. Our study aims to comprehensively compare the performance of the traditional radiomics model, deep learning radiomics model, and the fusion models in evaluating breast cancer ALN status based on dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) images.
Materials and Methods
The handcrafted radiomics features and deep features were extracted from 3062 DCE-MRI images. The feature selection was performed by applying mutual information and feature recursive elimination algorithms. The traditional radiomics model and deep learning radiomics model were built using the optimal features and machine learning classifiers, respectively. The fusion models for distinguishing axillary lymph node status were constructed using two fusion strategies. The performance of the models with MRI-reported lymphadenopathy or suspicious nodes to evaluate axillary lymph node status was also compared.
Results
The decision fusion model, with the integration of the radiomics features and deep learning features at the decision level, achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.879-0.937), which was higher than that of the traditional radiomics model and deep learning radiomics model. The results of the decision fusion model with clinical characteristic yielded an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.899-0.951), which was also superior to other models incorporating clinical characteristic.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the fusion models for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.