Vaccine refusal risk factors among parents of children with autism spectrum disorders.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Özlem Bağ, Sevay Alşen Güney
{"title":"Vaccine refusal risk factors among parents of children with autism spectrum disorders.","authors":"Özlem Bağ,&nbsp;Sevay Alşen Güney","doi":"10.24953/turkjped.2022.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccine refusal is a global trend and was announced as one of the top ten health threats in recent years. The rate of vaccine refusal (VR) among children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has also increased in parallel with the global trend but their vaccination behavior may differ from that of the normal population. This study aims to determine the VR rates among parents of children with ASD, to define the risk factors for developing VR, and to evaluate the parental concerns for childhood vaccinations in this susceptible population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 4-part survey questionnaire among parents of children with ASD, evaluating the vaccination status for both the child with ASD and their younger sibling. The vaccination uptake of the first child was accepted as the `baseline` behavior, while the following sibling`s uptake was suggested as the `current` behavior. The risk factors of VR were determined with logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group included 110 parents of children with ASD (M/F:76/34) and their younger siblings (M/F:57/53). The rate of `baseline VR` was 12.7 % whereas the `current VR` was 40% (p=0.001). High socioeconomic status (relative risk [RR]: 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-16.6; p=0.04), using social media as the main source of information (RR: 7; 95% CI: 1.5-32; p= 0.01) and lack of regular well-child visits of the sibling (RR: 25; 95% CI 4.1-166; p=0.001) were determined as risk factors for VR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vaccination behavior of parents changed after having a child with ASD, and thus, the younger siblings may constitute a risk group for VR. In clinical practice, pediatricians should be aware of this risk and evaluate the vaccination uptake of the younger siblings of children with ASD more carefully. Regular well-child visits and improving media literacy may be the key points to prevent VR in this susceptible population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49409,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"65 2","pages":"218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccine refusal is a global trend and was announced as one of the top ten health threats in recent years. The rate of vaccine refusal (VR) among children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has also increased in parallel with the global trend but their vaccination behavior may differ from that of the normal population. This study aims to determine the VR rates among parents of children with ASD, to define the risk factors for developing VR, and to evaluate the parental concerns for childhood vaccinations in this susceptible population.

Methods: We conducted a 4-part survey questionnaire among parents of children with ASD, evaluating the vaccination status for both the child with ASD and their younger sibling. The vaccination uptake of the first child was accepted as the `baseline` behavior, while the following sibling`s uptake was suggested as the `current` behavior. The risk factors of VR were determined with logistic regression analysis.

Results: The study group included 110 parents of children with ASD (M/F:76/34) and their younger siblings (M/F:57/53). The rate of `baseline VR` was 12.7 % whereas the `current VR` was 40% (p=0.001). High socioeconomic status (relative risk [RR]: 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-16.6; p=0.04), using social media as the main source of information (RR: 7; 95% CI: 1.5-32; p= 0.01) and lack of regular well-child visits of the sibling (RR: 25; 95% CI 4.1-166; p=0.001) were determined as risk factors for VR.

Conclusions: The vaccination behavior of parents changed after having a child with ASD, and thus, the younger siblings may constitute a risk group for VR. In clinical practice, pediatricians should be aware of this risk and evaluate the vaccination uptake of the younger siblings of children with ASD more carefully. Regular well-child visits and improving media literacy may be the key points to prevent VR in this susceptible population.

自闭症谱系障碍儿童家长拒绝接种疫苗的风险因素
背景:拒绝接种疫苗是一种全球趋势,近年来被宣布为十大健康威胁之一。自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的疫苗拒种率(VR)也与全球趋势平行上升,但他们的疫苗接种行为可能与正常人群不同。本研究旨在确定自闭症儿童家长的VR率,确定自闭症儿童发生VR的危险因素,并评估家长对这一易感人群儿童接种疫苗的担忧。方法:对ASD患儿家长进行4部分问卷调查,评估ASD患儿及其弟弟妹妹的疫苗接种情况。第一个孩子接种疫苗被认为是“基线”行为,而接下来的兄弟姐妹接种疫苗被认为是“当前”行为。采用logistic回归分析确定VR的危险因素。结果:研究组包括110名ASD患儿的父母(M/F:76/34)及其弟弟妹妹(M/F:57/53)。“基线VR”率为12.7%,而“当前VR”率为40% (p=0.001)。社会经济地位高(相对风险[RR]: 4.4;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.01-16.6;p=0.04),以社交媒体为主要信息来源(RR: 7;95% ci: 1.5-32;p= 0.01),兄弟姐妹缺乏定期的儿童探病(RR: 25;95% ci 4.1-166;p=0.001)被确定为VR的危险因素。结论:父母生下ASD后疫苗接种行为发生改变,弟弟妹妹可能是ASD的危险群体。在临床实践中,儿科医生应该意识到这种风险,并更仔细地评估自闭症儿童的弟妹接种疫苗的情况。定期对儿童进行健康检查和提高媒体素养可能是预防这一易感人群发生VR的关键点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is a multidisciplinary, peer reviewed, open access journal that seeks to publish research to advance the field of Pediatrics. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, review of the literature, short communications, clinicopathological exercises and letter to the editor in the field of pediatrics. Articles published in this journal are evaluated in an independent and unbiased, double blinded peer-reviewed fashion by an advisory committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信