Metatranscriptome analysis of blood in healthy individuals and irritable bowel syndrome patients.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Lauma Jagare, Maija Rozenberga, Ivars Silamikelis, Laura Ansone, Ilze Elbere, Monta Briviba, Kaspars Megnis, Ilze Konrade, Ilze Birka, Zane Straume, Janis Klovins
{"title":"Metatranscriptome analysis of blood in healthy individuals and irritable bowel syndrome patients.","authors":"Lauma Jagare,&nbsp;Maija Rozenberga,&nbsp;Ivars Silamikelis,&nbsp;Laura Ansone,&nbsp;Ilze Elbere,&nbsp;Monta Briviba,&nbsp;Kaspars Megnis,&nbsp;Ilze Konrade,&nbsp;Ilze Birka,&nbsp;Zane Straume,&nbsp;Janis Klovins","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Although the presence of micro-organisms in the blood of healthy humans is a relatively new concept, there is a growing amount of evidence that blood might have its own microbiome.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Previous research has targeted the taxonomic composition of the blood microbiome using DNA-based sequencing methods, while little information is known about the presence of microbial transcripts obtained from the blood and their relation to conditions connected with increased gut permeability.<b>Aim.</b> To detect potentially alive and active micro-organisms and investigate differences in taxonomic composition between healthy people and patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), we used the metatranscriptomics approach.<b>Methodology.</b> We collected blood samples from 23 IBS patients and 26 volunteers from the general population, and performed RNAseq on the isolated RNA. Reads corresponding to microbial genomes were identified with Kraken 2's standard plus protozoa and fungi database, and re-estimated at genus level with Bracken 2.7. We looked for trends in the taxonomic composition, making a comparison between the IBS and control groups, accounting for other different factors.<b>Results.</b> The dominant genera in the blood microbiome were found to be <i>Cutibacterium</i>, <i>Bradyrhizobium</i>, <i>Escherichia</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i>, <i>Micrococcus</i>, <i>Delftia</i>, <i>Mediterraneibacter</i>, <i>Staphylococcus</i>, <i>Stutzerimonas</i> and <i>Ralstonia</i>. Some of these are typical environmental bacteria and could partially represent contamination. However, analysis of sequences from the negative controls suggested that some genera which are characteristic of the gut microbiome (<i>Mediterraneibacter</i>, <i>Blautia</i>, <i>Collinsella</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i>, <i>Coprococcus</i>, <i>Dysosmobacter</i>, <i>Anaerostipes</i>, <i>Faecalibacterium</i>, <i>Dorea</i>, <i>Simiaoa</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Alistipes, Prevotella</i>, <i>Ruminococcus</i>) are less likely to be a result of contamination. Differential analysis of microbes between groups showed that some taxa associated with the gut microbiome (<i>Blautia</i>, <i>Faecalibacterium</i>, <i>Dorea</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i>, <i>Clostridium</i>, <i>Christensenella</i>) are more prevalent in IBS patients compared to the general population. No significant correlations with any other factors were identified.<b>Conclusion.</b> Our findings support the existence of the blood microbiome and suggest the gut and possibly the oral microbiome as its origin, while the skin microbiome is a possible but less certain source. The blood microbiome is likely influenced by states of increased gut permeability such as IBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"72 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Although the presence of micro-organisms in the blood of healthy humans is a relatively new concept, there is a growing amount of evidence that blood might have its own microbiome.Gap Statement. Previous research has targeted the taxonomic composition of the blood microbiome using DNA-based sequencing methods, while little information is known about the presence of microbial transcripts obtained from the blood and their relation to conditions connected with increased gut permeability.Aim. To detect potentially alive and active micro-organisms and investigate differences in taxonomic composition between healthy people and patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), we used the metatranscriptomics approach.Methodology. We collected blood samples from 23 IBS patients and 26 volunteers from the general population, and performed RNAseq on the isolated RNA. Reads corresponding to microbial genomes were identified with Kraken 2's standard plus protozoa and fungi database, and re-estimated at genus level with Bracken 2.7. We looked for trends in the taxonomic composition, making a comparison between the IBS and control groups, accounting for other different factors.Results. The dominant genera in the blood microbiome were found to be Cutibacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Escherichia, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, Delftia, Mediterraneibacter, Staphylococcus, Stutzerimonas and Ralstonia. Some of these are typical environmental bacteria and could partially represent contamination. However, analysis of sequences from the negative controls suggested that some genera which are characteristic of the gut microbiome (Mediterraneibacter, Blautia, Collinsella, Klebsiella, Coprococcus, Dysosmobacter, Anaerostipes, Faecalibacterium, Dorea, Simiaoa, Bifidobacterium, Alistipes, Prevotella, Ruminococcus) are less likely to be a result of contamination. Differential analysis of microbes between groups showed that some taxa associated with the gut microbiome (Blautia, Faecalibacterium, Dorea, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Christensenella) are more prevalent in IBS patients compared to the general population. No significant correlations with any other factors were identified.Conclusion. Our findings support the existence of the blood microbiome and suggest the gut and possibly the oral microbiome as its origin, while the skin microbiome is a possible but less certain source. The blood microbiome is likely influenced by states of increased gut permeability such as IBS.

健康个体和肠易激综合征患者血液的超转录组分析。
介绍。尽管健康人类血液中微生物的存在是一个相对较新的概念,但越来越多的证据表明,血液可能有自己的微生物群。差距的声明。先前的研究使用基于dna的测序方法针对血液微生物组的分类组成,而关于从血液中获得的微生物转录物的存在及其与肠道通透性增加相关的条件的关系的信息知之甚少。为了检测肠易激综合征(IBS)患者和健康人群之间潜在的活的和活跃的微生物,并研究其分类组成的差异,我们使用了亚转录组学方法。我们收集了23名IBS患者和26名普通人群志愿者的血液样本,并对分离的RNA进行了RNAseq。用Kraken 2的标准加原生动物和真菌数据库鉴定微生物基因组对应的Reads,用Bracken 2.7在属水平上重新估计。我们寻找分类组成的趋势,在IBS组和对照组之间进行比较,考虑到其他不同的因素。血液微生物组的优势属为Cutibacterium、Bradyrhizobium、Escherichia、Pseudomonas、Micrococcus、Delftia、mediterranebacter、Stutzerimonas和Ralstonia。其中一些是典型的环境细菌,可能部分代表污染。然而,对阴性对照的序列分析表明,一些具有肠道微生物组特征的属(地中海菌、蓝菌、柯林菌、克雷伯菌、粪球菌、厌氧菌、厌氧菌、Faecalibacterium、Dorea、Simiaoa、双歧杆菌、Alistipes、Prevotella、Ruminococcus)不太可能是污染的结果。组间微生物差异分析显示,与一般人群相比,肠易激综合征患者中一些与肠道微生物组相关的分类群(Blautia, Faecalibacterium, Dorea, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Christensenella)更为普遍。与其他因素均无显著相关性。我们的研究结果支持血液微生物组的存在,并表明肠道和口腔微生物组可能是其起源,而皮肤微生物组是一个可能的来源,但不太确定。血液微生物群可能受到肠易激综合征等肠道通透性增加的状态的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of medical microbiology
Journal of medical microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Microbiology provides comprehensive coverage of medical, dental and veterinary microbiology, and infectious diseases. We welcome everything from laboratory research to clinical trials, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology. We publish articles under the following subject categories: Antimicrobial resistance; Clinical microbiology; Disease, diagnosis and diagnostics; Medical mycology; Molecular and microbial epidemiology; Microbiome and microbial ecology in health; One Health; Pathogenesis, virulence and host response; Prevention, therapy and therapeutics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信