Measuring the ‘Inclusivity’ of Inclusive Business

Elise Wach
{"title":"Measuring the ‘Inclusivity’ of Inclusive Business","authors":"Elise Wach","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0225.2012.00009_2.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>‘Inclusive Business’ has enormous potential to contribute positively to development outcomes. Working through core business models, the ‘Inclusive Business’ approach requires minimal outside support and can often reach a scale unattainable by most direct development interventions. Take for example, Vodafone's M-PESA service, which has reached more than 18.5 million individuals since 2007 and continues to be a profitable business model (BCtA 2011).</p>\n <p>But when is business ‘inclusive’ and when is it simply business? How does Coca-Cola's business model in El Salvador contribute more to women's empowerment than its typical approach to selling fizzy drinks? Accurate information about business impacts – direct and indirect, positive and negative – can help practitioners to better identify (and support) the approaches that can most positively contribute to development.</p>\n <p>This paper analyses some of the current approaches and frameworks for evaluating ‘Inclusive Business’ impacts. It finds that while they shed light on the complex network of effects that businesses have and the ways in which some firms are attempting to contribute to development, they are unable to provide information about the actual impacts of business activities. More, higher quality, and less partial ‘Inclusive Business’ evaluations are needed to better enable us to harness the potential for business to contribute positively to development.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100616,"journal":{"name":"IDS Practice Papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0225.2012.00009_2.x","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Practice Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0225.2012.00009_2.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

‘Inclusive Business’ has enormous potential to contribute positively to development outcomes. Working through core business models, the ‘Inclusive Business’ approach requires minimal outside support and can often reach a scale unattainable by most direct development interventions. Take for example, Vodafone's M-PESA service, which has reached more than 18.5 million individuals since 2007 and continues to be a profitable business model (BCtA 2011).

But when is business ‘inclusive’ and when is it simply business? How does Coca-Cola's business model in El Salvador contribute more to women's empowerment than its typical approach to selling fizzy drinks? Accurate information about business impacts – direct and indirect, positive and negative – can help practitioners to better identify (and support) the approaches that can most positively contribute to development.

This paper analyses some of the current approaches and frameworks for evaluating ‘Inclusive Business’ impacts. It finds that while they shed light on the complex network of effects that businesses have and the ways in which some firms are attempting to contribute to development, they are unable to provide information about the actual impacts of business activities. More, higher quality, and less partial ‘Inclusive Business’ evaluations are needed to better enable us to harness the potential for business to contribute positively to development.

衡量包容性企业的“包容性”
“包容性商业”具有为发展成果作出积极贡献的巨大潜力。通过核心商业模式,“包容性商业”方法只需要很少的外部支持,而且往往可以达到大多数直接发展干预措施无法达到的规模。以沃达丰的M-PESA服务为例,该服务自2007年以来已惠及1850多万人,并继续成为一种盈利的商业模式(BCtA 2011)。但是什么时候商业是“包容性的”,什么时候仅仅是商业?可口可乐在萨尔瓦多的商业模式如何比其销售碳酸饮料的典型方式对妇女赋权贡献更多?关于业务影响的准确信息——直接的和间接的,积极的和消极的——可以帮助从业者更好地识别(并支持)对发展最积极贡献的方法。本文分析了目前评估“包容性商业”影响的一些方法和框架。报告发现,虽然它们揭示了企业具有的复杂影响网络以及一些企业试图促进发展的方式,但它们无法提供有关商业活动实际影响的信息。我们需要更多、更高质量、不那么片面的“包容性企业”评估,以便更好地利用企业为发展作出积极贡献的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信