Vaccines for all: A formative evaluation of a multistakeholder community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic for migrant communities

IF 3.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Linda E. Holdbrook , Nour Hassan , Sarah K. Clarke , Annalee Coakley , Eric Norrie , Mussie Yemane , Michael R. Youssef , Adanech Sahilie , Minnella Antonio , Edna Ramirez Cerino , Sachin R. Pendharkar , Deidre Lake , Denise L. Spitzer , Kevin Pottie , Samuel T. Edwards , Gabriel E. Fabreau
{"title":"Vaccines for all: A formative evaluation of a multistakeholder community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic for migrant communities","authors":"Linda E. Holdbrook ,&nbsp;Nour Hassan ,&nbsp;Sarah K. Clarke ,&nbsp;Annalee Coakley ,&nbsp;Eric Norrie ,&nbsp;Mussie Yemane ,&nbsp;Michael R. Youssef ,&nbsp;Adanech Sahilie ,&nbsp;Minnella Antonio ,&nbsp;Edna Ramirez Cerino ,&nbsp;Sachin R. Pendharkar ,&nbsp;Deidre Lake ,&nbsp;Denise L. Spitzer ,&nbsp;Kevin Pottie ,&nbsp;Samuel T. Edwards ,&nbsp;Gabriel E. Fabreau","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Racialized, low-income, and migrant populations experience persistent barriers to vaccines against COVID-19. These communities in East and Northeast Calgary were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, yet faced vaccine access barriers. Diverse multi-stakeholder coalitions and community partnerships can improve vaccine outreach strategies, but how stakeholders perceive these models is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a formative evaluation of a low-barrier, community-engaged vaccine outreach clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on June 5–6, 2021. We delivered an online post-clinic survey to clinic stakeholders, to assess whether the clinic achieved its collectively derived pre-specified goals (effective, efficient, patient-centered, and safe), to asses whether the clinic model was scalable, and to solicit improvement recommendations. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 166/195 (85%) stakeholders responded. The majority were from non-healthcare positions (59%), between 30 and 49 years of age (87/136; 64%), and self-identified as racialized individuals (96/136; 71%). Respondents felt the clinic was effective (99.2%), efficient (96.9%), patient-centered (92.3%), and safe (90.8%), and that the outreach model was scalable 94.6% (123/130). There were no differences across stakeholder categories. The open-ended survey responses supported the scale responses. Improvement suggestions describe increased time for clinic planning and promotion, more multilingual staff, and further efforts to reduce accessibility barriers, such as priority check-in for people with disabilities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Diverse stakeholders almost universally felt that this community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic achieved its goals and was scalable. These findings support the value of community-engaged outreach to improve vaccine equity among other marginalized newcomer communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623523000387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Racialized, low-income, and migrant populations experience persistent barriers to vaccines against COVID-19. These communities in East and Northeast Calgary were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, yet faced vaccine access barriers. Diverse multi-stakeholder coalitions and community partnerships can improve vaccine outreach strategies, but how stakeholders perceive these models is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a formative evaluation of a low-barrier, community-engaged vaccine outreach clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on June 5–6, 2021. We delivered an online post-clinic survey to clinic stakeholders, to assess whether the clinic achieved its collectively derived pre-specified goals (effective, efficient, patient-centered, and safe), to asses whether the clinic model was scalable, and to solicit improvement recommendations. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results

Overall, 166/195 (85%) stakeholders responded. The majority were from non-healthcare positions (59%), between 30 and 49 years of age (87/136; 64%), and self-identified as racialized individuals (96/136; 71%). Respondents felt the clinic was effective (99.2%), efficient (96.9%), patient-centered (92.3%), and safe (90.8%), and that the outreach model was scalable 94.6% (123/130). There were no differences across stakeholder categories. The open-ended survey responses supported the scale responses. Improvement suggestions describe increased time for clinic planning and promotion, more multilingual staff, and further efforts to reduce accessibility barriers, such as priority check-in for people with disabilities.

Conclusion

Diverse stakeholders almost universally felt that this community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic achieved its goals and was scalable. These findings support the value of community-engaged outreach to improve vaccine equity among other marginalized newcomer communities.

Abstract Image

人人享有疫苗:对移民社区多利益攸关方参与的COVID-19疫苗外展诊所的形成性评估
种族化、低收入和流动人口在获得COVID-19疫苗方面一直存在障碍。卡尔加里东部和东北部的这些社区受到COVID-19的影响不成比例,但仍面临疫苗获取障碍。不同的多利益攸关方联盟和社区伙伴关系可以改善疫苗外展战略,但利益攸关方如何看待这些模式尚不清楚。方法我们于2021年6月5日至6日对加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里的一家低障碍、社区参与的疫苗外展诊所进行了形成性评估。我们向诊所利益相关者提供了一项在线的门诊后调查,以评估诊所是否实现了其集体制定的预先指定目标(有效、高效、以患者为中心和安全),评估诊所模式是否可扩展,并征求改进建议。调查结果采用描述性统计和专题分析进行分析。结果总体而言,166/195(85%)的利益相关者做出了回应。大多数来自非医疗岗位(59%),年龄在30至49岁之间(87/136;64%),并自认为是种族化的个体(96/136;71%)。受访者认为该诊所有效(99.2%)、高效(96.9%)、以患者为中心(92.3%)、安全(90.8%),外展模式可扩展(94.6%)。涉众类别之间没有差异。开放式调查的回答支持量表的回答。改进建议包括增加诊所规划和推广的时间,增加多语种工作人员,以及进一步努力减少无障碍障碍,例如为残疾人优先登记。结论不同的利益相关者几乎普遍认为,这个社区参与的COVID-19疫苗外展诊所实现了目标,具有可扩展性。这些发现支持社区参与外展的价值,以改善其他边缘化新移民社区的疫苗公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信