Understanding how healthcare providers build consumer trust in the Australian food system: A qualitative study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12809
Heath Pillen, Liz Withall, Emma Tonkin, Paul R Ward, Samantha B Meyer, Julie Henderson, Dean McCullum, John Coveney, Annabelle M Wilson
{"title":"Understanding how healthcare providers build consumer trust in the Australian food system: A qualitative study.","authors":"Heath Pillen, Liz Withall, Emma Tonkin, Paul R Ward, Samantha B Meyer, Julie Henderson, Dean McCullum, John Coveney, Annabelle M Wilson","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify how dietitians and other healthcare providers work to build trust in food systems in the course of providing dietary education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 purposefully sampled dietitians (n = 5), general practitioners (n = 5), and complementary and alternative medicine practitioners (n = 5) within metropolitan South Australia. Interview data were then interpreted using an inductive thematic analysis approach, involving the construction of themes representing trust-enhancing roles around which beliefs about professional roles, the 'patient', and food and health were clustered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare providers communicate beliefs regarding (dis)trust in food systems through: (i) responding to patient queries and concerns following a food incident or scare; (ii) helping patients to identify (un)trustworthy elements of food supply systems; and (iii) encouraging consumption of locally produced and minimally processed food. Importantly, the expression of these roles differed according to participant beliefs about food and health (medico-scientific versus alternative medicine) and their adoption of professional projects that sought to promote medico-scientific ways of thinking about health and diet or manage the failures of Western medicine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development and consolidation of trust-enhancing roles amongst healthcare providers likely requires disciplinary reflection on professional values and the processes by which practitioners apply these values to understanding food systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to identify how dietitians and other healthcare providers work to build trust in food systems in the course of providing dietary education.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 purposefully sampled dietitians (n = 5), general practitioners (n = 5), and complementary and alternative medicine practitioners (n = 5) within metropolitan South Australia. Interview data were then interpreted using an inductive thematic analysis approach, involving the construction of themes representing trust-enhancing roles around which beliefs about professional roles, the 'patient', and food and health were clustered.

Results: Healthcare providers communicate beliefs regarding (dis)trust in food systems through: (i) responding to patient queries and concerns following a food incident or scare; (ii) helping patients to identify (un)trustworthy elements of food supply systems; and (iii) encouraging consumption of locally produced and minimally processed food. Importantly, the expression of these roles differed according to participant beliefs about food and health (medico-scientific versus alternative medicine) and their adoption of professional projects that sought to promote medico-scientific ways of thinking about health and diet or manage the failures of Western medicine.

Conclusion: The development and consolidation of trust-enhancing roles amongst healthcare providers likely requires disciplinary reflection on professional values and the processes by which practitioners apply these values to understanding food systems.

了解医疗服务提供者如何在澳大利亚食品系统中建立消费者信任:定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在确定营养师和其他医疗服务提供者在提供饮食教育的过程中如何努力建立对食品系统的信任:对南澳大利亚大都市的 15 名营养师(5 人)、全科医生(5 人)以及补充和替代医学从业人员(5 人)进行了半结构式定性访谈。然后采用归纳式主题分析方法对访谈数据进行解释,包括构建代表增进信任角色的主题,围绕这些主题,对专业角色、"患者 "以及食物和健康的信念进行分组:结果:医疗服务提供者通过以下方式传达对食品系统(不)信任的信念:(i) 在食品事故或恐慌发生后回应患者的询问和关切;(ii) 帮助患者识别食品供应系统中(不)值得信任的因素;(iii) 鼓励消费本地生产的、加工程度最低的食品。重要的是,这些角色的表现形式因参与者对食品和健康的信仰(医学科学与替代医学)以及他们所采用的专业项目而有所不同,这些专业项目旨在推广关于健康和饮食的医学科学思维方式或管理西医的失败:结论:要在医疗保健提供者中发展和巩固增进信任的角色,可能需要对专业价值观以及从业者将这些价值观用于理解食物系统的过程进行学科反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信