Clinical and imaging modality factors impacting radiological interpretation of breast screening in young women with neurofibromatosis type 1.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Familial Cancer Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s10689-023-00340-5
Mathilda Wilding, Jane Fleming, Katrina Moore, Ashley Crook, Ranjani Reddy, Sarah Choi, Timothy E Schlub, Michael Field, Lavvina Thiyagarajan, Jeff Thompson, Yemima Berman
{"title":"Clinical and imaging modality factors impacting radiological interpretation of breast screening in young women with neurofibromatosis type 1.","authors":"Mathilda Wilding,&nbsp;Jane Fleming,&nbsp;Katrina Moore,&nbsp;Ashley Crook,&nbsp;Ranjani Reddy,&nbsp;Sarah Choi,&nbsp;Timothy E Schlub,&nbsp;Michael Field,&nbsp;Lavvina Thiyagarajan,&nbsp;Jeff Thompson,&nbsp;Yemima Berman","doi":"10.1007/s10689-023-00340-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young women with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high risk of developing breast cancer and poorer survival following breast cancer diagnosis. International guidelines recommend commencing breast screening between 30 and 35 years; however, the optimal screening modality is unestablished, and previous reports suggest that breast imaging may be complicated by the presence of intramammary and cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs). The aim of this study was to explore potential barriers to implementation of breast screening for young women with NF1.Twenty-seven women (30-47 years) with NF1 completed breast screening with breast MRI, mammogram and breast ultrasound. Nineteen probably benign/suspicious lesions were detected across 14 women. Despite the presence of breast cNFs, initial biopsy rate for participants with NF1 (37%), were comparable to a BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) cohort (25%) (P = 0.311). No cancers or intramammary neurofibromas were identified. Most participants (89%) returned for second round screening.The presence of cNF did not affect clinician confidence in 3D mammogram interpretation, although increasing breast density, frequently seen in young women, impeded confidence for 2D and 3D mammogram. Moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI was higher in the NF1 cohort (70.4%) than BRCA PV carriers (47.3%), which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.Breast MRI was the preferred mode of screening over mammogram, as the majority (85%) with NF1 demonstrated breast density (BI-RADS 3C/4D), which hinders mammogram interpretation. For those with high breast density and high cNF breast coverage, 3D rather than 2D mammogram is preferred, if MRI is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"499-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-023-00340-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young women with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have a high risk of developing breast cancer and poorer survival following breast cancer diagnosis. International guidelines recommend commencing breast screening between 30 and 35 years; however, the optimal screening modality is unestablished, and previous reports suggest that breast imaging may be complicated by the presence of intramammary and cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs). The aim of this study was to explore potential barriers to implementation of breast screening for young women with NF1.Twenty-seven women (30-47 years) with NF1 completed breast screening with breast MRI, mammogram and breast ultrasound. Nineteen probably benign/suspicious lesions were detected across 14 women. Despite the presence of breast cNFs, initial biopsy rate for participants with NF1 (37%), were comparable to a BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) cohort (25%) (P = 0.311). No cancers or intramammary neurofibromas were identified. Most participants (89%) returned for second round screening.The presence of cNF did not affect clinician confidence in 3D mammogram interpretation, although increasing breast density, frequently seen in young women, impeded confidence for 2D and 3D mammogram. Moderate or marked background parenchymal enhancement on MRI was higher in the NF1 cohort (70.4%) than BRCA PV carriers (47.3%), which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer.Breast MRI was the preferred mode of screening over mammogram, as the majority (85%) with NF1 demonstrated breast density (BI-RADS 3C/4D), which hinders mammogram interpretation. For those with high breast density and high cNF breast coverage, 3D rather than 2D mammogram is preferred, if MRI is unavailable.

Abstract Image

影响1型神经纤维瘤病年轻女性乳腺筛查放射学解释的临床和影像学因素。
患有1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)的年轻女性在诊断为癌症后,患乳腺癌症的风险较高,生存率较低。国际指南建议在30至35岁之间开始乳腺筛查;然而,最佳的筛查方式尚未确定,先前的报道表明,乳腺影像学可能因存在肌内和皮肤神经纤维瘤(cNFs)而变得复杂。本研究的目的是探索对患有NF1的年轻女性实施乳腺筛查的潜在障碍。患有NF1疾病的20岁至47岁女性通过乳腺MRI、乳房X光检查和乳腺超声完成了乳腺筛查。在14名女性中检测到19个可能是良性/可疑病变。尽管存在乳腺cNFs,但NF1参与者的初始活检率(37%)与BRCA致病性变体(PV)队列(25%)相当(P = 0.311)。未发现癌症或肌内神经纤维瘤。大多数参与者(89%)返回进行第二轮筛查。cNF的存在并不影响临床医生对3D乳房X光检查的信心,尽管在年轻女性中常见的乳房密度增加阻碍了2D和3D乳房X射线检查的信心。在NF1队列中,MRI上的中度或显著背景实质增强(70.4%)高于BRCA PV携带者(47.3%),这是癌症的一个独立危险因素。与乳房X光检查相比,乳腺MRI是首选的筛查模式,因为大多数(85%)患有NF1的患者显示出乳腺密度(BI-RADS 3C/4D),这阻碍了乳房X光照片的解释。对于那些乳腺密度高、cNF乳腺覆盖率高的患者,如果MRI不可用,则首选3D而非2D乳房X光检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信