An evaluation of feeding practices and determination of barriers to providing nutritional support in a multidisciplinary South African intensive care unit.

E Elmezoughi, K de Vasconcellos
{"title":"An evaluation of feeding practices and determination of barriers to providing nutritional support in a multidisciplinary South African intensive care unit.","authors":"E Elmezoughi,&nbsp;K de Vasconcellos","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate nutritional support is crucial to optimising intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess adherence to current nutritional guidelines in critically ill patients in South Africa (SA). To identify risk factors for non-adherence to guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational chart review of nutritional practices, from 1 December 2017 to 31 May 2018, during the first week of ICU admission in adult patients admitted to a tertiary, multidisciplinary ICU in Durban, SA, for >48 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort (N=150) had a median age of 39 years and an ICU mortality of 28%. Surgical patients accounted for 50.7% of admissions. Ninety-eight percent of patients received mechanical ventilation, 75% required inotropic support, and 56% had acute kidney injury. The median time to initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) was 3 days, with EN being initiated within 48 hours in 39% of patients, and by day 7 80% of patients had received EN. Goal feeds were reached in 23% of patients by discharge, death or day 7. Parenteral nutrition was initiated in 16.7% of patients. There was an association between shock, acute kidney injury, increasing sequential organ failure assessment score and inotrope dose, and failure to initiate EN. Failure to initiate EN was predominantly due to unavoidable factors, but a number of clinical and administrative areas were identified to improve EN delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adequate nutrition is associated with reduced morbidity, ICU length of stay, mortality and improved functional outcomes. More attention to avoiding barriers to adequate ICU nutrition and enhanced adherence to feeding protocols should be encouraged.</p><p><strong>Contributions of the study: </strong>This study significantly adds to the limited data available from sub- Saharan Africa on nutritional practices in critical care, and in particular barriers to provision of EN. It is further anticipated that the findings of the study will contribute in making recommendations in an attempt to improve the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.412","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adequate nutritional support is crucial to optimising intensive care unit (ICU) outcomes.

Objectives: To assess adherence to current nutritional guidelines in critically ill patients in South Africa (SA). To identify risk factors for non-adherence to guideline.

Methods: Retrospective observational chart review of nutritional practices, from 1 December 2017 to 31 May 2018, during the first week of ICU admission in adult patients admitted to a tertiary, multidisciplinary ICU in Durban, SA, for >48 hours.

Results: The study cohort (N=150) had a median age of 39 years and an ICU mortality of 28%. Surgical patients accounted for 50.7% of admissions. Ninety-eight percent of patients received mechanical ventilation, 75% required inotropic support, and 56% had acute kidney injury. The median time to initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) was 3 days, with EN being initiated within 48 hours in 39% of patients, and by day 7 80% of patients had received EN. Goal feeds were reached in 23% of patients by discharge, death or day 7. Parenteral nutrition was initiated in 16.7% of patients. There was an association between shock, acute kidney injury, increasing sequential organ failure assessment score and inotrope dose, and failure to initiate EN. Failure to initiate EN was predominantly due to unavoidable factors, but a number of clinical and administrative areas were identified to improve EN delivery.

Conclusion: Adequate nutrition is associated with reduced morbidity, ICU length of stay, mortality and improved functional outcomes. More attention to avoiding barriers to adequate ICU nutrition and enhanced adherence to feeding protocols should be encouraged.

Contributions of the study: This study significantly adds to the limited data available from sub- Saharan Africa on nutritional practices in critical care, and in particular barriers to provision of EN. It is further anticipated that the findings of the study will contribute in making recommendations in an attempt to improve the outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在南非一个多学科重症监护室对喂养方法的评估和提供营养支持的障碍的确定。
背景:充足的营养支持是优化重症监护病房(ICU)预后的关键。目的:评估南非危重患者对当前营养指南的遵守情况。确定不遵守指南的危险因素。方法:回顾性观察图表回顾2017年12月1日至2018年5月31日,南非德班一家三级多学科ICU收治的成年患者在ICU入住第一周内的营养实践,时间>48小时。结果:研究队列(N=150)的中位年龄为39岁,ICU死亡率为28%。手术患者占入院人数的50.7%。98%的患者接受机械通气,75%需要肌力支持,56%有急性肾损伤。开始肠内营养(EN)的中位时间为3天,39%的患者在48小时内开始肠内营养,到第7天,80%的患者接受了肠内营养。23%的患者在出院、死亡或第7天达到了目标喂养。16.7%的患者开始肠外营养。休克、急性肾损伤、序贯器官衰竭评估评分和肌力剂量增加,以及未能启动EN之间存在关联。未能启动EN主要是由于不可避免的因素,但确定了一些临床和管理领域,以改善EN的交付。结论:充足的营养与降低发病率、ICU住院时间、死亡率和改善功能预后有关。应鼓励更多地注意避免对ICU充足营养的障碍,并加强对喂养方案的遵守。研究贡献:本研究显著补充了撒哈拉以南非洲关于重症监护营养实践的有限数据,特别是提供EN的障碍。进一步预期,这项研究的结果将有助于提出建议,以期改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信