Thermal Imaging to Predict Failed Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Medhat Gamal, Ahmed Hasanin, Nada Adly, Maha Mostafa, Ahmed M Yonis, Ashraf Rady, Nasr M Abdallah, Mohammed Ibrahim, Mohamed Elsayad
{"title":"Thermal Imaging to Predict Failed Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Medhat Gamal,&nbsp;Ahmed Hasanin,&nbsp;Nada Adly,&nbsp;Maha Mostafa,&nbsp;Ahmed M Yonis,&nbsp;Ashraf Rady,&nbsp;Nasr M Abdallah,&nbsp;Mohammed Ibrahim,&nbsp;Mohamed Elsayad","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S406057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful brachial plexus blockade produces sympathetic blockade, resulting in increased skin temperature in the blocked segments. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography in predicting failed segmental supraclavicular brachial plexus block.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing upper-limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sensation was evaluated at the dermatomal distribution of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. Block failure was defined as absence of complete sensory loss 30 min after block completion. Skin temperature was evaluated by infrared thermography at the dermatomal supply of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at baseline, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after block completion. The temperature change from the baseline measurement was calculated for each time point. Outcomes were the ability of temperature change at each site to predict failed block of the corresponding nerve using area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were available for the final analysis. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of temperature change at 5 min to predict failed ulnar, median, and radial nerve block was 0.79 (0.68-0.87), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.79 (0.69-0.88). The AUC (95% CI) increased progressively and reached its maximum values at 15 min (ulnar nerve 0.98 [0.92-1.00], median nerve 0.97 [0.90-0.99], radial nerve 0.96 [0.89-0.99]) with negative predictive value of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Infrared thermography of different skin segments provides an accurate tool for predicting failed supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Increased skin temperature at each segment can exclude block failure in the corresponding nerve with 100% accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/71/lra-16-71.PMC10263017.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S406057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Successful brachial plexus blockade produces sympathetic blockade, resulting in increased skin temperature in the blocked segments. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of infrared thermography in predicting failed segmental supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Methods: This prospective observational study included adult patients undergoing upper-limb surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Sensation was evaluated at the dermatomal distribution of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves. Block failure was defined as absence of complete sensory loss 30 min after block completion. Skin temperature was evaluated by infrared thermography at the dermatomal supply of the ulnar, median, and radial nerves at baseline, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after block completion. The temperature change from the baseline measurement was calculated for each time point. Outcomes were the ability of temperature change at each site to predict failed block of the corresponding nerve using area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis.

Results: Eighty patients were available for the final analysis. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of temperature change at 5 min to predict failed ulnar, median, and radial nerve block was 0.79 (0.68-0.87), 0.77 (0.67-0.86), and 0.79 (0.69-0.88). The AUC (95% CI) increased progressively and reached its maximum values at 15 min (ulnar nerve 0.98 [0.92-1.00], median nerve 0.97 [0.90-0.99], radial nerve 0.96 [0.89-0.99]) with negative predictive value of 100%.

Conclusion: Infrared thermography of different skin segments provides an accurate tool for predicting failed supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Increased skin temperature at each segment can exclude block failure in the corresponding nerve with 100% accuracy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

热成像预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:成功的臂丛阻滞产生交感阻滞,导致阻滞节段皮肤温度升高。本研究旨在评估红外热成像预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败的准确性。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入锁骨上臂丛阻滞下接受上肢手术的成年患者。在尺神经、正中神经和桡神经的皮皮分布上评估感觉。阻滞失败定义为阻滞完成后30分钟没有完全感觉丧失。在阻滞完成后的基线、5分钟、10分钟、15分钟和20分钟,通过红外热像仪评估尺神经、正中神经和桡神经皮皮供应处的皮肤温度。计算每个时间点与基线测量值相比的温度变化。结果是利用受者操作特征曲线(AUC)分析下的面积,每个部位的温度变化预测相应神经阻滞失败的能力。结果:80例患者可用于最终分析。5分钟温度变化预测尺神经、正中神经和桡神经阻滞失败的AUC(95%置信区间[CI])分别为0.79(0.68-0.87)、0.77(0.67-0.86)和0.79(0.69-0.88)。AUC (95% CI)逐渐增加,15 min时达到最大值(尺神经0.98[0.92-1.00],正中神经0.97[0.90-0.99],桡神经0.96[0.89-0.99]),阴性预测值为100%。结论:不同皮肤节段的红外热成像为预测锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞失败提供了准确的工具。每节段皮肤温度升高可以100%准确地排除相应神经阻滞失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信