COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice.

Alessandro C Pasqualotto, Amanda L Seus
{"title":"COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice.","authors":"Alessandro C Pasqualotto,&nbsp;Amanda L Seus","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000478.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the virus, three qPCR tests are performed, targeting the viral genes N1 and N2, in addition to the internal control gene RNase P. Samples in which internal control fails to amplify should be labelled 'invalid'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aims to determine the frequency of inhibition of the RNase P gene used as an internal control in qPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in a reference hospital in Southern Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February 2021 to 31 March 2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 10, 311 samples were available for analysis. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the RNAse P gene was 26.65 and the standard deviation was 3.18. A total of 252 samples were inhibited (2.4%) during the study period: amongst these, 77 (30.5%) showed late amplifications (beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean Ct value), and 175 (69.4%) revealed no fluorescence at all for the RNase P gene.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed a low percentage of inhibition using RNase P as an internal control in COVID-19 PCRs using the CDC protocol, thus proving the effectiveness of this protocol for identification of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Re-extraction was efficacious for samples that showed little or no fluorescence for the RNase P gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":6956,"journal":{"name":"Access Microbiology","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267656/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000478.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the virus, three qPCR tests are performed, targeting the viral genes N1 and N2, in addition to the internal control gene RNase P. Samples in which internal control fails to amplify should be labelled 'invalid'.

Methods: This study aims to determine the frequency of inhibition of the RNase P gene used as an internal control in qPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in a reference hospital in Southern Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February 2021 to 31 March 2021).

Results: A total 10, 311 samples were available for analysis. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the RNAse P gene was 26.65 and the standard deviation was 3.18. A total of 252 samples were inhibited (2.4%) during the study period: amongst these, 77 (30.5%) showed late amplifications (beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean Ct value), and 175 (69.4%) revealed no fluorescence at all for the RNase P gene.

Conclusions: This study showed a low percentage of inhibition using RNase P as an internal control in COVID-19 PCRs using the CDC protocol, thus proving the effectiveness of this protocol for identification of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Re-extraction was efficacious for samples that showed little or no fluorescence for the RNase P gene.

COVID-19 PCR:临床实践中内控抑制频率。
实时(定量)PCR (qPCR)是诊断COVID-19(冠状病毒病2019)的最佳方法,是最敏感的病毒RNA检测和定量方法。使用疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的方案,对每个检测病毒的样本进行三次qPCR检测,除了内部控制基因RNase p外,还针对病毒基因N1和N2进行检测。内部控制未能扩增的样本应标记为“无效”。方法:本研究旨在确定在COVID-19大流行期间(2021年2月1日至2021年3月31日),巴西南部一家参考医院的SARS-CoV-2(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2)qPCR检测中用作内控的RNase P基因的抑制频率。结果:检出样品10311份。RNAse P基因的平均周期阈值(Ct)为26.65,标准差为3.18。在研究期间,共有252份样本(2.4%)被抑制,其中77份(30.5%)显示延迟扩增(超过平均Ct值2个标准差),175份(69.4%)完全没有RNase P基因的荧光。结论:本研究显示,在使用CDC方案的COVID-19 pcr中,以RNase P为内对照的抑制率较低,从而证明了该方案在临床样品中鉴定SARS-CoV-2的有效性。对于RNase P基因荧光很少或没有荧光的样品,重新提取是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信