Confidentiality, public interest, and the human right to science: when can confidential information be used for the benefit of the wider community?

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Edward S Dove
{"title":"Confidentiality, public interest, and the human right to science: when can confidential information be used for the benefit of the wider community?","authors":"Edward S Dove","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsad013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores whether the human right to science can support the public interest as a legal basis to use and disclose confidential information. The contextual focus is scientific research; the jurisdictional focus is England. The human right to science, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 27) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 15), hitherto has not been invoked in support of a public interest basis for lawful disclosure, but the argument is made herein that there may be scope to develop this jurisprudentially. On grounds of both law and policy, and in line with the underlying rationale of recent UK Government deployment of 'COPI Notices' for lawful use of confidential patient information in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, I contend that the human right to science may well serve as a valuable juridical buttress to an overriding public interest justification to lawfully share confidential information. However, this could occur only in restricted circumstances where the public interest is clearly manifest, namely studies researching serious, imminent health threats to the general population that rely on confidential information accessed outside of existing statutory gateways, and not more routine scientific endeavors.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"10 1","pages":"lsad013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores whether the human right to science can support the public interest as a legal basis to use and disclose confidential information. The contextual focus is scientific research; the jurisdictional focus is England. The human right to science, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 27) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Article 15), hitherto has not been invoked in support of a public interest basis for lawful disclosure, but the argument is made herein that there may be scope to develop this jurisprudentially. On grounds of both law and policy, and in line with the underlying rationale of recent UK Government deployment of 'COPI Notices' for lawful use of confidential patient information in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, I contend that the human right to science may well serve as a valuable juridical buttress to an overriding public interest justification to lawfully share confidential information. However, this could occur only in restricted circumstances where the public interest is clearly manifest, namely studies researching serious, imminent health threats to the general population that rely on confidential information accessed outside of existing statutory gateways, and not more routine scientific endeavors.

保密、公共利益和科学的人权:什么时候可以将机密信息用于更广泛的社会利益?
本文探讨了科学人权是否可以作为公共利益的法律依据来支持机密信息的使用和披露。语境焦点是科学研究;管辖权的焦点是英格兰。《世界人权宣言》(第27条)和《经济、社会及文化权利国际公约》(第15条)所反映的科学人权迄今尚未被援引来支持合法披露的公共利益基础,但本文提出的论点是,在法理上可能有发展这一权利的余地。基于法律和政策的理由,并与最近英国政府在COVID-19大流行期间合法使用机密患者信息的“COPI通知”的基本理由相一致,我认为,科学的人权很可能成为合法共享机密信息的压倒一切的公共利益理由的宝贵司法支持。然而,这只能发生在公共利益明显的有限情况下,即研究对一般人群的严重、迫在眉睫的健康威胁,这些研究依赖于在现有法定门户之外获取的机密信息,而不是更常规的科学努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信