Systemic emergency department performance in a low resource tertiary health facility in central Kenya: Micro level emergency care system evaluation

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Miriam Miima , Emmanuel Marsuk
{"title":"Systemic emergency department performance in a low resource tertiary health facility in central Kenya: Micro level emergency care system evaluation","authors":"Miriam Miima ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Marsuk","doi":"10.1016/j.afjem.2023.05.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emergency care system (ECS) performance is a proxy indicator of emergency care (EC) response and health systems resilience. The Emergency Care and System Assessment tool (ECSA) provides a structure for measuring emergency department (ED) systemic performance, using high quality ECS metrics. These metrics aligned with WHO targeted priority action areas facilitate synergies in supporting ECS evaluation at the micro level.</p><p>Retrospective file reviews and anecdotal evidence from a low resource tertiary health facility between 1st January 2020 – 31st May 2021 showed that: - the governance structure had administrative and financial autonomy from the public healthcare system, healthcare financing was mostly out of pocket (OPP) and the human resource ecosystem was structured in operations, enforcement and training to drive EC quality improvement. More than two thirds of the patients were high acuity but only 2% of the patients died. Most sentinel ED functions were available at the facility however the facility does not have a developed prehospital care, neurosurgical nor a burns unit.</p><p>Micro ECS framework derived from ECSA objectively interrogates performance of the healthcare system that supports EC in a tertiary facility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48515,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239690/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211419X23000277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Emergency care system (ECS) performance is a proxy indicator of emergency care (EC) response and health systems resilience. The Emergency Care and System Assessment tool (ECSA) provides a structure for measuring emergency department (ED) systemic performance, using high quality ECS metrics. These metrics aligned with WHO targeted priority action areas facilitate synergies in supporting ECS evaluation at the micro level.

Retrospective file reviews and anecdotal evidence from a low resource tertiary health facility between 1st January 2020 – 31st May 2021 showed that: - the governance structure had administrative and financial autonomy from the public healthcare system, healthcare financing was mostly out of pocket (OPP) and the human resource ecosystem was structured in operations, enforcement and training to drive EC quality improvement. More than two thirds of the patients were high acuity but only 2% of the patients died. Most sentinel ED functions were available at the facility however the facility does not have a developed prehospital care, neurosurgical nor a burns unit.

Micro ECS framework derived from ECSA objectively interrogates performance of the healthcare system that supports EC in a tertiary facility.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肯尼亚中部一个低资源三级卫生机构的系统急诊部门绩效:微观层面的急救系统评估
紧急护理系统(ECS)性能是紧急护理(EC)响应和卫生系统弹性的代理指标。急救和系统评估工具(ECSA)提供了一个使用高质量ECS指标衡量急诊科(ED)系统绩效的结构。这些指标与世界卫生组织有针对性的优先行动领域相一致,有助于协同支持微观层面的云服务器评估。2020年1月1日至2021年5月31日期间,来自一家低资源三级卫生机构的回顾性文件审查和轶事证据表明:治理结构具有独立于公共医疗系统的行政和财务自主权,医疗融资大多是自付的(OPP),人力资源生态系统在运营中是结构化的,执行和培训,以推动EC质量改进。超过三分之二的患者视力很高,但只有2%的患者死亡。该设施提供了大多数前哨ED功能,但该设施没有完善的院前护理、神经外科和烧伤科。源自ECSA的Micro ECS框架客观地询问了在三级机构中支持EC的医疗保健系统的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
85 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信