Grasping the structure of the care management process evaluation items that are related to care management skills with regard to individual users: conducting verification through self-assessment by care managers.

Yoshio Suzuki, Reiko Ishiyama
{"title":"Grasping the structure of the care management process evaluation items that are related to care management skills with regard to individual users: conducting verification through self-assessment by care managers.","authors":"Yoshio Suzuki,&nbsp;Reiko Ishiyama","doi":"10.2185/jrm.2022-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to understand the structure of a self-assessment for evaluating the care management skills of individuals in the care management process. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A survey was distributed to 964 care managers in home care management hailing from each committee in Japanese municipalities in Ibaraki, Chiba, Saitama, Kanagawa, and Tokyo. The process implementation degree of care management in 46 care management process evaluation items was assessed using a five-point method. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were derived for the items, and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ascertain the factor structure. We also verified the relationship between the factor scores, presence or absence of a chief care manager, and years of experience. <b>Results:</b> We received 385 responses (response rate: 39.9%), of which 372 were included in the analysis (valid response rate: 96.6%). Six factors were extracted, and 29 items were retained because of the exploratory factor analysis. Three of the six factors did not exist in the existing scales and had a unique structure. The cumulative contribution rate of the six factors was 64.9%, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all items was α=0.95, with Factor 1 being 0.88; Factor 2 being 0.83; Factor 3 being 0.86; Factor 4 being 0.85; Factor 5 being 0.80; and Factor 6 being 0.87. The total score for Factors 1, 2, 4, and 5 was significantly higher among chief care managers. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between scale scores and years of experience. Factor 1 (r=0.22) and Factor 2 (r=0.21) showed a modest positive correlation between the scale scores and years of experience. <b>Conclusion:</b> We retained 29 items and extracted six factors for the care manager self-assessment items that had a unique factor structure while following existing scales' factor structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":73939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8f/b0/jrm-18-096.PMC10079459.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of rural medicine : JRM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2185/jrm.2022-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to understand the structure of a self-assessment for evaluating the care management skills of individuals in the care management process. Materials and Methods: A survey was distributed to 964 care managers in home care management hailing from each committee in Japanese municipalities in Ibaraki, Chiba, Saitama, Kanagawa, and Tokyo. The process implementation degree of care management in 46 care management process evaluation items was assessed using a five-point method. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were derived for the items, and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ascertain the factor structure. We also verified the relationship between the factor scores, presence or absence of a chief care manager, and years of experience. Results: We received 385 responses (response rate: 39.9%), of which 372 were included in the analysis (valid response rate: 96.6%). Six factors were extracted, and 29 items were retained because of the exploratory factor analysis. Three of the six factors did not exist in the existing scales and had a unique structure. The cumulative contribution rate of the six factors was 64.9%, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all items was α=0.95, with Factor 1 being 0.88; Factor 2 being 0.83; Factor 3 being 0.86; Factor 4 being 0.85; Factor 5 being 0.80; and Factor 6 being 0.87. The total score for Factors 1, 2, 4, and 5 was significantly higher among chief care managers. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between scale scores and years of experience. Factor 1 (r=0.22) and Factor 2 (r=0.21) showed a modest positive correlation between the scale scores and years of experience. Conclusion: We retained 29 items and extracted six factors for the care manager self-assessment items that had a unique factor structure while following existing scales' factor structure.

Abstract Image

掌握个体用户与护理管理技能相关的护理管理流程评价项目的结构:通过护理管理者的自评进行验证。
目的:了解护理管理过程中个体护理管理技能的自评量表结构。材料与方法:对日本茨城市、千叶市、埼玉市、神奈川市和东京市各委员会的964名家庭护理管理人员进行调查。采用五分法对46个护理管理过程评价项目的护理管理过程实施程度进行评价。推导各项目的Cronbach’s alpha系数,并进行探索性因子分析以确定因子结构。我们还验证了因子得分、是否有首席护理经理和经验年数之间的关系。结果:共收到应答385份,应答率为39.9%,其中纳入分析372份,有效应答率为96.6%。提取因子6项,探索性因子分析保留29项。六个因素中有三个在现有的量表中不存在,并且具有独特的结构。6个因素的累积贡献率为64.9%,各项目的Cronbach′s α系数为α=0.95,其中因子1为0.88;因子2为0.83;因子3为0.86;因子4为0.85;因子5为0.80;因子6为0.87。因子1、2、4和5的总分在首席护理经理中显著较高。计算Pearson相关系数以确定量表得分与经验年数之间的相关性。因子1 (r=0.22)和因子2 (r=0.21)显示量表得分与经验年数之间存在适度正相关。结论:在遵循现有量表因子结构的基础上,我们保留了29个项目,提取了6个具有独特因子结构的护理经理自评项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信