Antidepressant Strategies for Treatment of Acute Depressive Episodes Among Veterans.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Paulo R Shiroma, Paul Thuras, David M Atkinson, Eric Baltutis, Martin Bloch, Anders Westanmo
{"title":"Antidepressant Strategies for Treatment of Acute Depressive Episodes Among Veterans.","authors":"Paulo R Shiroma,&nbsp;Paul Thuras,&nbsp;David M Atkinson,&nbsp;Eric Baltutis,&nbsp;Martin Bloch,&nbsp;Anders Westanmo","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2016 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Major Depressive Disorder offers consensus-based recommendations when response to the initial antidepressant medication is suboptimal; however, little is known about \"real-world\" pharmacological strategies used by providers treating depression in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted pharmacy and administrative records of patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder and treated at the Minneapolis VAHCS between January 1, 2010 and May 11, 2021. Patients with bipolar disorder, psychosis-spectrum, or dementia diagnoses were excluded. An algorithm was developed to identify antidepressant strategies: monotherapy (MONO); optimization (OPM); switching (SWT); combination (COM); and augmentation (AUG). Additional data extracted included demographics, service utilization, other psychiatric diagnoses, and clinical risk for hospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 1298 patients, 11.3% of whom were female. The mean age of the sample was 51 years. Half of the patients received MONO, with 40% of those patients receiving inadequate doses. OPM was the most common next-step strategy. SWT and COM/AUG were used for 15.9% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients who received COM/AUG were younger. OPM, SWT, and COM/AUG occurred more frequently in psychiatric services settings and required a greater number of outpatient visits. The association between antidepressant strategies and risk of mortality became nonsignificant after accounting for age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the veterans with acute depression were treated with a single antidepressant, while COM and AUG were rarely used. The age of the patient, and not necessarily greater medical risks, appeared to be a major factor in decisions about antidepressant strategies. Future studies should evaluate whether implementation of underutilized COM and AUG strategies early in the course of depression treatment are feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The 2016 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Major Depressive Disorder offers consensus-based recommendations when response to the initial antidepressant medication is suboptimal; however, little is known about "real-world" pharmacological strategies used by providers treating depression in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS).

Methods: We extracted pharmacy and administrative records of patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder and treated at the Minneapolis VAHCS between January 1, 2010 and May 11, 2021. Patients with bipolar disorder, psychosis-spectrum, or dementia diagnoses were excluded. An algorithm was developed to identify antidepressant strategies: monotherapy (MONO); optimization (OPM); switching (SWT); combination (COM); and augmentation (AUG). Additional data extracted included demographics, service utilization, other psychiatric diagnoses, and clinical risk for hospitalization and mortality.

Results: The sample consisted of 1298 patients, 11.3% of whom were female. The mean age of the sample was 51 years. Half of the patients received MONO, with 40% of those patients receiving inadequate doses. OPM was the most common next-step strategy. SWT and COM/AUG were used for 15.9% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Overall, patients who received COM/AUG were younger. OPM, SWT, and COM/AUG occurred more frequently in psychiatric services settings and required a greater number of outpatient visits. The association between antidepressant strategies and risk of mortality became nonsignificant after accounting for age.

Conclusions: Most of the veterans with acute depression were treated with a single antidepressant, while COM and AUG were rarely used. The age of the patient, and not necessarily greater medical risks, appeared to be a major factor in decisions about antidepressant strategies. Future studies should evaluate whether implementation of underutilized COM and AUG strategies early in the course of depression treatment are feasible.

退伍军人急性抑郁发作的抗抑郁策略。
目标:当对初始抗抑郁药物的反应不理想时,2016年退伍军人事务部/国防部重大抑郁症管理临床实践指南提供了基于共识的建议;然而,对于退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(VAHCS)中治疗抑郁症的提供者使用的“现实世界”药物策略知之甚少。方法:我们提取了2010年1月1日至2021年5月11日期间在明尼阿波利斯退伍军人事务医疗保护系统接受治疗的抑郁症患者的药房和行政记录。患有双相情感障碍、精神病谱系或痴呆症的患者被排除在外。开发了一种算法来确定抗抑郁策略:单药治疗(MONO);优化;切换(SWT);组合(COM);和扩增(AUG)。提取的其他数据包括人口统计、服务利用率、其他精神病诊断以及住院和死亡的临床风险。结果:样本包括1298名患者,其中11.3%为女性。样本的平均年龄为51岁。一半的患者接受了MONO,其中40%的患者接受的剂量不足。OPM是最常见的下一步策略。SWT和COM/AUG分别用于15.9%和2.6%的患者。总体而言,接受COM/AUG的患者年龄较小。OPM、SWT和COM/AUG在精神病服务环境中发生的频率更高,需要更多的门诊就诊次数。考虑年龄因素后,抗抑郁策略与死亡率之间的相关性变得不显著。结论:大多数患有急性抑郁症的退伍军人使用单一的抗抑郁药治疗,而COM和AUG很少使用。患者的年龄,不一定有更大的医疗风险,似乎是决定抗抑郁策略的主要因素。未来的研究应该评估在抑郁症治疗过程中早期实施未充分利用的COM和AUG策略是否可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信