Localization of alpha 2,6-linked sialic acid residues in gastrointestinal tract compartments of some tetrapod’s representatives: Comparative histochemical study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Aziz Awaad, Ahmed Rushdy, Mohamed A. Adly
{"title":"Localization of alpha 2,6-linked sialic acid residues in gastrointestinal tract compartments of some tetrapod’s representatives: Comparative histochemical study","authors":"Aziz Awaad,&nbsp;Ahmed Rushdy,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Adly","doi":"10.1016/j.acthis.2023.152055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Epithelial mucins composed mainly of glycoproteins<span><span> and play a vital role as protective barrier against a variety of harmful molecules and microbial infection. Additionally sialic acids, like glycoproteins, are considered as a main component of epithelial mucins and play an important role in </span>mucosal immunity. For example, alpha 2,6-linked galactose/N-acetyl-galactosamine (Gal/GalNAc) sialic acid residues can recognize and mask different biological sites in some intermolecular or intercellular interactions. In this study, the localization sites relationship between general mucins and alpha 2,6-linked Gal/GalNAc sialic acid residues in different compartments in </span></span>gastrointestinal tract<span><span><span> (GIT) of tetrapod representatives were investigated using </span>lectin </span>histochemistry. The toad (</span></span><span><em>Bufo</em><em> regularis</em></span>), lizard (<em>Trachylepis quinquetaeniata</em>), pigeon (<em>Columba livia domestica</em>) and mouse (<span><em>Mus musculus</em></span><span><span><span>) were used as amphibian, reptilian, avian and mammalian representatives respectively. In general, the biodistribution<span> sites of mucins are localized in most compartment sites and partially overlapped with the sites of sialic acid residues in some compartment in each animal representative. Additionally, the localization sites of both mucins and sialic acid in the GIT regions differ based on the tissue type<span> in each tetrapod representative. The mucosa of oesophagus in the toad and lizard showed higher positive signal of general mucins compared with other tetrapod representatives. However, the mucosa of the oesophagus in the toad revealed a positive signal of sialic acid in the tubular glands only, whereas the lizard’s mucosa showed a positive signal of sialic acid in the </span></span></span>goblet cells. Additionally, the pigeon’s oesophagus showed no localization of the sialic acid or mucins while, all layers of the mouse’s oesophagus showed a positive localization of the sialic acid residues. In the stomach, all </span>stomach mucosa<span><span> compartments in all representatives showed positive signal of mucins, while the gastric glands in the toad, pigeon (proventricular glands) and mouse showed signals of sialic acid residues localization but in different trends. While the lizard showed a localization of the sialic acid in the mucosal lamina propria only. Furthermore, the mucosa of the ileum showed positive signal of mucin in the goblet cells and some absorptive cells brush borders in all tetrapod animals. While a higher signal of the sialic acid residues in the absorptive cells but not the goblet cells in the case of the toad and mouse. While the lizard’s ileum showed a higher localization of sialic acid in the goblet cells only. Mucin localization in the rectum was similar to those in ileum. Specifically, the toad and lizard showed signals of the sialic acid residues in the goblet cells only, while the mouse’s rectum showed a higher signal of sialic acids in the absorptive cells and lamina propria but not in the goblet cells. The present study introduces important data about the biodistribution and localization profiles of general mucins and sialic acids residues in the GIT different compartments in each representative of tetrapoda animals. Further studies are needed to investigate the important role of sialic acid residues localization in different compartments of </span>GIT mucosa.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128123000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epithelial mucins composed mainly of glycoproteins and play a vital role as protective barrier against a variety of harmful molecules and microbial infection. Additionally sialic acids, like glycoproteins, are considered as a main component of epithelial mucins and play an important role in mucosal immunity. For example, alpha 2,6-linked galactose/N-acetyl-galactosamine (Gal/GalNAc) sialic acid residues can recognize and mask different biological sites in some intermolecular or intercellular interactions. In this study, the localization sites relationship between general mucins and alpha 2,6-linked Gal/GalNAc sialic acid residues in different compartments in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of tetrapod representatives were investigated using lectin histochemistry. The toad (Bufo regularis), lizard (Trachylepis quinquetaeniata), pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and mouse (Mus musculus) were used as amphibian, reptilian, avian and mammalian representatives respectively. In general, the biodistribution sites of mucins are localized in most compartment sites and partially overlapped with the sites of sialic acid residues in some compartment in each animal representative. Additionally, the localization sites of both mucins and sialic acid in the GIT regions differ based on the tissue type in each tetrapod representative. The mucosa of oesophagus in the toad and lizard showed higher positive signal of general mucins compared with other tetrapod representatives. However, the mucosa of the oesophagus in the toad revealed a positive signal of sialic acid in the tubular glands only, whereas the lizard’s mucosa showed a positive signal of sialic acid in the goblet cells. Additionally, the pigeon’s oesophagus showed no localization of the sialic acid or mucins while, all layers of the mouse’s oesophagus showed a positive localization of the sialic acid residues. In the stomach, all stomach mucosa compartments in all representatives showed positive signal of mucins, while the gastric glands in the toad, pigeon (proventricular glands) and mouse showed signals of sialic acid residues localization but in different trends. While the lizard showed a localization of the sialic acid in the mucosal lamina propria only. Furthermore, the mucosa of the ileum showed positive signal of mucin in the goblet cells and some absorptive cells brush borders in all tetrapod animals. While a higher signal of the sialic acid residues in the absorptive cells but not the goblet cells in the case of the toad and mouse. While the lizard’s ileum showed a higher localization of sialic acid in the goblet cells only. Mucin localization in the rectum was similar to those in ileum. Specifically, the toad and lizard showed signals of the sialic acid residues in the goblet cells only, while the mouse’s rectum showed a higher signal of sialic acids in the absorptive cells and lamina propria but not in the goblet cells. The present study introduces important data about the biodistribution and localization profiles of general mucins and sialic acids residues in the GIT different compartments in each representative of tetrapoda animals. Further studies are needed to investigate the important role of sialic acid residues localization in different compartments of GIT mucosa.

一些四足动物代表的胃肠道区室中α-2,6-连接唾液酸残基的定位:比较组织化学研究
上皮粘蛋白主要由糖蛋白组成,在抵御各种有害分子和微生物感染方面发挥着至关重要的保护屏障作用。此外,唾液酸和糖蛋白一样,被认为是上皮粘蛋白的主要成分,在粘膜免疫中发挥着重要作用。例如,α-2,6-连接的半乳糖/N-乙酰基-半乳糖胺(Gal/GalNAc)唾液酸残基可以识别和掩盖分子间或细胞间相互作用中的不同生物位点。在本研究中,使用凝集素组织化学方法研究了四足动物代表的胃肠道(GIT)不同区室中一般粘蛋白和α2,6-连接的Gal/GalNAc唾液酸残基之间的定位位点关系。蟾蜍(Bufo regularis)、蜥蜴(Trachylepis quiqueteniata)、鸽子(Columba livia domestica)和老鼠(Mus musculus)分别作为两栖动物、爬行动物、鸟类和哺乳动物的代表。通常,粘蛋白的生物分布位点位于大多数隔室位点,并与每个动物代表的某些隔室中唾液酸残基的位点部分重叠。此外,粘蛋白和唾液酸在GIT区域的定位位点因每个四足动物代表的组织类型而异。蟾蜍和蜥蜴的食道粘膜与其他四足动物相比,显示出更高的一般粘蛋白阳性信号。然而,蟾蜍的食道粘膜仅在管状腺中显示出唾液酸的阳性信号,而蜥蜴的粘膜在杯状细胞中显示出了唾液酸的正信号。此外,鸽子的食道没有唾液酸或粘蛋白的定位,而小鼠食道的所有层都显示出唾液酸残基的阳性定位。在胃中,所有代表的所有胃粘膜区均显示粘蛋白阳性信号,而蟾蜍、鸽子(前胃腺)和小鼠的胃腺显示唾液酸残留定位信号,但趋势不同。而蜥蜴的唾液酸仅局限于粘膜固有层。此外,在所有四足动物中,回肠粘膜的杯状细胞和一些吸收细胞刷状边界中都显示出粘蛋白的阳性信号。而在蟾蜍和小鼠的情况下,吸收细胞中唾液酸残基的信号较高,而杯状细胞中没有。而蜥蜴的回肠仅在杯状细胞中显示出较高的唾液酸定位。粘蛋白在直肠中的定位与在回肠中的定位相似。具体来说,蟾蜍和蜥蜴只在杯状细胞中显示出唾液酸残基的信号,而小鼠的直肠在吸收细胞和固有层中显示出更高的唾液酸信号,但在杯状细胞没有。本研究介绍了关于每种代表性四足动物的GIT不同区室中一般粘蛋白和唾液酸残基的生物分布和定位特征的重要数据。需要进一步的研究来研究唾液酸残基定位在GIT粘膜不同区室中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信