{"title":"Chiropractic Profession Attrition: A Narrative Review of Studies Over the Past 30 Years","authors":"Curtis Thor Rigney DC, MRes, Sandra Grace PhD, Joanne Bradbury PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this review was to investigate and discuss the available literature regarding chiropractic<span> profession attrition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this narrative review, searches for peer-reviewed observational and experimental papers published from January 1991 to December 2021 were conducted in the following 5 databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine<span> Database), Scopus<span>, and Web of Science. Keywords included “chiropractic,” “attrition,” and “burnout, professional.” Studies related to student or patient dropouts were excluded.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three of 108 identified papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies that measured attrition rates reported between 4.5% and 27.8%. These ranges are limited to 1982 to 1991 graduates of Life College of Chiropractic West and individuals issued a California chiropractic license in 1991. The remaining study that investigated the attitudes of nonpracticing chiropractors proposed multifactorial causes leading to attrition. The 3 included studies used retrospective observational design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The literature is limited, and factors linked to attrition or career mobility remain inconclusive. A better understanding of chiropractic profession attrition rates is needed to offer insights into the profession's practice environment, education, and professional outcomes. Accurate information on attrition may assist with workforce modeling and help prepare for the projected increase in musculoskeletal health care demand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"30 ","pages":"Pages 9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10258235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349923000025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this review was to investigate and discuss the available literature regarding chiropractic profession attrition.
Methods
For this narrative review, searches for peer-reviewed observational and experimental papers published from January 1991 to December 2021 were conducted in the following 5 databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included “chiropractic,” “attrition,” and “burnout, professional.” Studies related to student or patient dropouts were excluded.
Results
Three of 108 identified papers met the inclusion criteria. Two studies that measured attrition rates reported between 4.5% and 27.8%. These ranges are limited to 1982 to 1991 graduates of Life College of Chiropractic West and individuals issued a California chiropractic license in 1991. The remaining study that investigated the attitudes of nonpracticing chiropractors proposed multifactorial causes leading to attrition. The 3 included studies used retrospective observational design.
Conclusion
The literature is limited, and factors linked to attrition or career mobility remain inconclusive. A better understanding of chiropractic profession attrition rates is needed to offer insights into the profession's practice environment, education, and professional outcomes. Accurate information on attrition may assist with workforce modeling and help prepare for the projected increase in musculoskeletal health care demand.
目的本综述旨在调查和讨论有关脊骨神经医学专业流失的现有文献。方法在以下5个数据库中检索1991年1月至2021年12月发表的同行评审的观察和实验论文:MEDLINE、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)、AMED(联合和补充医学数据库)、Scopus和Web of Science。关键词包括“脊骨神经医学”、“自然减员”和“职业倦怠”。与学生或患者辍学有关的研究被排除在外。结果108篇论文中有3篇符合入选标准。两项测量流失率的研究报告称,流失率在4.5%至27.8%之间。这些范围仅限于1982年至1991年西脊医生命学院毕业生和1991年获得加州脊医执照的个人。剩下的研究调查了非执业脊医的态度,提出了导致自然减员的多因素原因。3项纳入研究采用回顾性观察设计。结论文献有限,与自然减员或职业流动性相关的因素仍不确定。需要更好地了解脊骨神经医学专业的流失率,以便深入了解该专业的执业环境、教育和专业成果。关于损耗的准确信息可能有助于劳动力建模,并有助于为肌肉骨骼医疗保健需求的预计增长做好准备。