Assessment of the pain induced by vaccination according to the injected arm (COVID-19 vaccination)

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Amélie Barreau, Anne-Hélène Boivin, Brigitte Castaing, Pascal Brault, Nathalie Darraillans, Adrien Auvet, Jérôme Dimet
{"title":"Assessment of the pain induced by vaccination according to the injected arm (COVID-19 vaccination)","authors":"Amélie Barreau,&nbsp;Anne-Hélène Boivin,&nbsp;Brigitte Castaing,&nbsp;Pascal Brault,&nbsp;Nathalie Darraillans,&nbsp;Adrien Auvet,&nbsp;Jérôme Dimet","doi":"10.3917/rsi.149.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since its discovery, the concept of vaccination has continued to improve in order to offer better efficacy and tolerance. Local or even diffuse reactions are often reported, but no study reports results on the injection side. We carried out a prospective observational study on the COVID-19 vaccination centers of the Landes regional hospital consortium (GHT) over three weeks. A questionnaire was given after the second injection, and assessed patients’ feelings about the first injection. During this period, 2797 patients received their second injection and 2487 responded to the questionnaire, of which 2301 are usable. 81% of vaccinations were performed on the weak arm and 19% on the dominant arm. Local pain/discomfort was reported by 47% of patients on both arms, occurring the same day as the vaccination took place for half of the patients and the next day for the other half, with an average intensity of 3.3. Extensive pain/discomfort was present in 19% of patients, regardless of which arm was injected. The choice of the injected arm does not seem to have influence on pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.149.0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its discovery, the concept of vaccination has continued to improve in order to offer better efficacy and tolerance. Local or even diffuse reactions are often reported, but no study reports results on the injection side. We carried out a prospective observational study on the COVID-19 vaccination centers of the Landes regional hospital consortium (GHT) over three weeks. A questionnaire was given after the second injection, and assessed patients’ feelings about the first injection. During this period, 2797 patients received their second injection and 2487 responded to the questionnaire, of which 2301 are usable. 81% of vaccinations were performed on the weak arm and 19% on the dominant arm. Local pain/discomfort was reported by 47% of patients on both arms, occurring the same day as the vaccination took place for half of the patients and the next day for the other half, with an average intensity of 3.3. Extensive pain/discomfort was present in 19% of patients, regardless of which arm was injected. The choice of the injected arm does not seem to have influence on pain.

按注射臂(COVID-19疫苗)评估疫苗接种引起的疼痛
自发现以来,疫苗接种的概念不断改进,以提供更好的疗效和耐受性。局部甚至弥漫性反应经常被报道,但没有研究报道注射侧的结果。我们对Landes地区医院联盟(GHT)的COVID-19疫苗接种中心进行了为期三周的前瞻性观察研究。第二次注射后进行问卷调查,评估患者对第一次注射的感受。在此期间,2797例患者接受了第二次注射,2487例患者回复了问卷,其中2301例可用。81%的疫苗接种在弱臂进行,19%在优势臂进行。47%的患者报告了双臂的局部疼痛/不适,其中一半患者在接种疫苗的同一天发生,另一半患者在第二天发生,平均强度为3.3。19%的患者存在广泛的疼痛/不适,无论哪只手臂注射。注射臂的选择似乎对疼痛没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信