Intervening against the patient’s wishes: pro re nata medication and the phenomenological experience of nurses working in a forensic psychiatry environment

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Recherche en Soins Infirmiers Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Charlène Seyer-Forget, Dave Holmes, Jean Daniel Jacob, Emmanuelle Bernheim, Étienne Paradis-Gagné
{"title":"Intervening against the patient’s wishes: pro re nata medication and the phenomenological experience of nurses working in a forensic psychiatry environment","authors":"Charlène Seyer-Forget,&nbsp;Dave Holmes,&nbsp;Jean Daniel Jacob,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Bernheim,&nbsp;Étienne Paradis-Gagné","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In forensic psychiatry environments, nurses are regularly confronted with the use of restrictive measures such as chemical restraints and are forced to constantly navigate between care and social control. The debate over the ethics of coercion and the use of control measures for violence in psychiatric settings is far from resolved. The objective of this study is to understand the ethical experience of nurses in a Canadian forensic psychiatry environment when administering PRN (when required) medication against the patient's will. The experiences of 14 nurses are analyzed from a critical ethical perspective through interpretive phenomenological analysis. Across the three main categories-certainties, paradoxes, and learning-the results show that nurses must simultaneously commit their allegiance to the patient, to the justice system, and to the culture of the \"total\" institution. These multiple allegiances generate paradoxes that affect the way nurses actualize their professional role.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In forensic psychiatry environments, nurses are regularly confronted with the use of restrictive measures such as chemical restraints and are forced to constantly navigate between care and social control. The debate over the ethics of coercion and the use of control measures for violence in psychiatric settings is far from resolved. The objective of this study is to understand the ethical experience of nurses in a Canadian forensic psychiatry environment when administering PRN (when required) medication against the patient's will. The experiences of 14 nurses are analyzed from a critical ethical perspective through interpretive phenomenological analysis. Across the three main categories-certainties, paradoxes, and learning-the results show that nurses must simultaneously commit their allegiance to the patient, to the justice system, and to the culture of the "total" institution. These multiple allegiances generate paradoxes that affect the way nurses actualize their professional role.

干预病人的意愿:自然药物和现象学经验的护士在法医精神病学环境中工作
在法医精神病学环境中,护士经常面临使用限制性措施,如化学约束,并被迫不断在护理和社会控制之间进行导航。关于精神病院暴力胁迫和使用控制措施的道德问题的争论远未解决。本研究的目的是了解加拿大法医精神病学环境中护士在违背患者意愿给予PRN(必要时)药物时的道德经验。通过解释现象学分析,从批判伦理的角度分析了14名护士的经历。通过三个主要类别——确定性、悖论和学习——结果表明,护士必须同时忠于病人、司法系统和“整体”机构的文化。这些多重忠诚产生了矛盾,影响了护士实现其专业角色的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信