Understanding the role of social media usage and health self-efficacy in the processing of COVID-19 rumors: A SOR perspective

Xiaofei Zhang , Yixuan Liu , Ziru Qin , Zilin Ye , Fanbo Meng
{"title":"Understanding the role of social media usage and health self-efficacy in the processing of COVID-19 rumors: A SOR perspective","authors":"Xiaofei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yixuan Liu ,&nbsp;Ziru Qin ,&nbsp;Zilin Ye ,&nbsp;Fanbo Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.dim.2023.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Apart from the direct health and behavioral influence of the COVID-19 pandemic itself, COVID-19 rumors as an infodemic enormously amplified public anxiety and cause serious outcomes. Although factors influencing such rumors propagation have been widely studied by previous studies, the role of spatial factors (e.g., proximity to the pandemic) on individuals’ response regarding COVID-19 rumors remain largely unexplored. Accordingly, this study, drawing on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework, examined how proximity to the pandemic (stimulus) influences anxiety (organism), which in turn determines rumor beliefs and rumor outcomes (response). Further, the contingent role of social media usage and health self-efficacy were tested. The research model was tested using 1246 samples via an online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. The results indicate that: (1)The proximity closer the public is to the pandemic, the higher their perceived anxiety; (2) Anxiety increases rumor beliefs, which is further positively associated rumor outcomes; (3) When the level of social media usage is high, the relationship between proximity to the pandemic and anxiety is strengthened; (4) When the level of health self-efficacy is high, the effect of anxiety on rumor beliefs is strengthened and the effect of rumor beliefs on rumor outcomes is also strengthened. This study provides a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of the propagation of COVID-19 rumors from a SOR perspective. Additionally, this paper is one of the first that proposes and empirically verifies the contingent role of social media usage and health self-efficacy on the SOR framework. The findings of study can assist the pandemic prevention department in to efficiently manage rumors with the aim of alleviating public anxiety and avoiding negative outcomes cause by rumors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72769,"journal":{"name":"Data and information management","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100043"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data and information management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925123000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apart from the direct health and behavioral influence of the COVID-19 pandemic itself, COVID-19 rumors as an infodemic enormously amplified public anxiety and cause serious outcomes. Although factors influencing such rumors propagation have been widely studied by previous studies, the role of spatial factors (e.g., proximity to the pandemic) on individuals’ response regarding COVID-19 rumors remain largely unexplored. Accordingly, this study, drawing on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework, examined how proximity to the pandemic (stimulus) influences anxiety (organism), which in turn determines rumor beliefs and rumor outcomes (response). Further, the contingent role of social media usage and health self-efficacy were tested. The research model was tested using 1246 samples via an online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. The results indicate that: (1)The proximity closer the public is to the pandemic, the higher their perceived anxiety; (2) Anxiety increases rumor beliefs, which is further positively associated rumor outcomes; (3) When the level of social media usage is high, the relationship between proximity to the pandemic and anxiety is strengthened; (4) When the level of health self-efficacy is high, the effect of anxiety on rumor beliefs is strengthened and the effect of rumor beliefs on rumor outcomes is also strengthened. This study provides a better understanding of the underlying mechanism of the propagation of COVID-19 rumors from a SOR perspective. Additionally, this paper is one of the first that proposes and empirically verifies the contingent role of social media usage and health self-efficacy on the SOR framework. The findings of study can assist the pandemic prevention department in to efficiently manage rumors with the aim of alleviating public anxiety and avoiding negative outcomes cause by rumors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

了解社交媒体使用和健康自我效能感在COVID-19谣言处理中的作用:SOR视角
除了新冠肺炎大流行本身对健康和行为的直接影响外,新冠肺炎谣言作为一种信息媒介极大地放大了公众的焦虑,并造成了严重后果。尽管先前的研究对影响此类谣言传播的因素进行了广泛研究,但空间因素(如与大流行的接近程度)对个人对新冠肺炎谣言的反应的作用在很大程度上仍未得到探索。因此,这项研究利用刺激-机体反应(SOR)框架,研究了与大流行(刺激)的接近程度如何影响焦虑(机体),而焦虑又决定了谣言的信念和谣言的结果(反应)。此外,还测试了社交媒体使用和健康自我效能的偶然作用。在中国新冠肺炎大流行期间,通过在线调查,使用1246份样本对该研究模型进行了测试。结果表明:(1)公众离疫情越近,他们的焦虑感就越高;(2) 焦虑增加了谣言信念,这与谣言结果进一步呈正相关;(3) 当社交媒体使用水平较高时,接近疫情与焦虑之间的关系会加强;(4) 当健康自我效能水平高时,焦虑对谣言信念的影响增强,谣言信念对谣言结果的影响也增强。本研究从SOR的角度更好地理解了新冠肺炎谣言传播的潜在机制。此外,本文是第一篇提出并实证验证社交媒体使用和健康自我效能在SOR框架中的偶然作用的论文之一。研究结果有助于防疫部门有效管理谣言,以缓解公众焦虑,避免谣言带来的负面后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Data and information management
Data and information management Management Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信