Use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) by intensive care paramedics to achieve peripheral intravenous access in patients predicted to be difficult: An out-of-hospital pilot study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Samuel O. Burton , Jake K. Donovan , Samuel L. Jones , Luke M. Phillips , David J. Anderson , Benjamin N. Meadley
{"title":"Use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) by intensive care paramedics to achieve peripheral intravenous access in patients predicted to be difficult: An out-of-hospital pilot study","authors":"Samuel O. Burton ,&nbsp;Jake K. Donovan ,&nbsp;Samuel L. Jones ,&nbsp;Luke M. Phillips ,&nbsp;David J. Anderson ,&nbsp;Benjamin N. Meadley","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Intravenous cannulation<span> is a common procedure for paramedics. Difficulty is often encountered and may result in escalation of care to an intensive care paramedic (ICP). Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access (USGPIVA) is used in-hospital as an alternative approach. Historically limited to physicians, it is increasingly embraced by non-physicians, with point of care ultrasound (POCUS) devices more affordable, portable, and suited to the out of hospital environment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore the utility of ICP-performed USGPIVA for patients who are predicted to be difficult according to a difficult intravenous access scoring tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a prospective observational pilot study of ICPs who used the adult difficult intravenous access (A-DIVA) scale to predict difficulty and perform USGPIVA using a contemporary POCUS device.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the 32 patients enroled, the overall success rate was 50% of which 87% were successful on the first attempt. Mean A-DIVA score was 4.1/5, and paradoxically, success improved with A-DIVA-predicted difficulty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ICPs can perform USGPIVA with moderate success. The A-DIVA score could be useful for paramedics to predict difficult cannulation. Future research should focus on increasing exposure, training time and enhancing feedback to paramedics performing USGPIVA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000860","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Intravenous cannulation is a common procedure for paramedics. Difficulty is often encountered and may result in escalation of care to an intensive care paramedic (ICP). Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access (USGPIVA) is used in-hospital as an alternative approach. Historically limited to physicians, it is increasingly embraced by non-physicians, with point of care ultrasound (POCUS) devices more affordable, portable, and suited to the out of hospital environment.

Objective

To explore the utility of ICP-performed USGPIVA for patients who are predicted to be difficult according to a difficult intravenous access scoring tool.

Methods

This was a prospective observational pilot study of ICPs who used the adult difficult intravenous access (A-DIVA) scale to predict difficulty and perform USGPIVA using a contemporary POCUS device.

Results

For the 32 patients enroled, the overall success rate was 50% of which 87% were successful on the first attempt. Mean A-DIVA score was 4.1/5, and paradoxically, success improved with A-DIVA-predicted difficulty.

Conclusion

ICPs can perform USGPIVA with moderate success. The A-DIVA score could be useful for paramedics to predict difficult cannulation. Future research should focus on increasing exposure, training time and enhancing feedback to paramedics performing USGPIVA.

重症监护护理人员使用护理点超声(POCUS)来实现预计困难患者的外周静脉注射:一项院外试点研究
引言静脉插管是护理人员常用的一种方法。经常会遇到困难,并可能导致将护理升级为重症监护护理人员(ICP)。超声引导的外周静脉通路(USGPIVA)在医院中被用作一种替代方法。从历史上看,它仅限于医生,越来越多地被非医生所接受,护理点超声(POCUS)设备更实惠、更便携,更适合院外环境。目的探讨ICP执行的USGPIVA对根据困难静脉通路评分工具预测为困难的患者的实用性。方法这是一项前瞻性的观察性试点研究,研究对象是ICPs,他们使用成人困难静脉内通路(a-DIVA)量表来预测困难,并使用现代POCUS设备进行USGPIVA。结果32例患者的总成功率为50%,其中87%的患者首次尝试成功。A-DIVA的平均得分为4.1/5,矛盾的是,A-DIVA预测的难度提高了成功率。结论ICPs可进行USGPIVA,成功率适中。A-DIVA评分可用于护理人员预测插管困难。未来的研究应侧重于增加暴露量、培训时间和加强对进行USGPIVA的护理人员的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信