Chemical characterization of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from multiple cooking cuisines and purification efficiency assessments

IF 6.9 Q1 Environmental Science
Hanyu Zhang , Xuejun Wang , Xianbao Shen , Xin Li , Bobo Wu , Guohao Li , Huahua Bai , Xinyue Cao , Xuewei Hao , Qi Zhou , Zhiliang Yao
{"title":"Chemical characterization of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from multiple cooking cuisines and purification efficiency assessments","authors":"Hanyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Xuejun Wang ,&nbsp;Xianbao Shen ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Bobo Wu ,&nbsp;Guohao Li ,&nbsp;Huahua Bai ,&nbsp;Xinyue Cao ,&nbsp;Xuewei Hao ,&nbsp;Qi Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhiliang Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cooking process can produce abundant volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are harmful to environment and human health. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis in which VOCs emissions from multiple cuisines have been sampled based on the simulation and acquisition platform, involving concentration characteristics, ozone formation potential (OFP) and purification efficiency assessments. VOCs emissions varied from 1828.5 to 14,355.1 µg/m<sup>3</sup><span><span><span>, with the maximum and minimum values from Barbecue and Family cuisine, respectively. Alkanes and alcohol had higher contributions to VOCs from Sichuan and Hunan cuisine (64.1%), Family cuisine (66.3%), Shandong cuisine (69.1%) and Cantonese cuisine (69.8%), with the dominant VOCs species of ethanol, isobutane and n-butane. In comparison, alcohols (79.5%) were abundant for Huaiyang cuisine, while alkanes (19.7%), alkenes (35.9%) and haloalkanes (22.9%) accounted for higher proportions from Barbecue. Specially, </span>carbon tetrachloride, n-hexylene and 1-butene were the most abundant VOCs species for Barbecue, ranging from 8.8% to 14.6%. The highest OFP occurred in Barbecue. The sensitive species of OFP for Huaiyang cuisine were alcohols, while other cuisines were alkenes. Purification efficiency assessments shed light on the removal differences of individual and synergistic control </span>technologies. VOCs emissions exhibited a strong dependence on the photocatalytic oxidation, with the removal efficiencies of 29.0%–54.4%. However, the high voltage electrostatic, wet purification and mechanical separation techniques played a mediocre or even counterproductive role in the VOCs reduction, meanwhile collaborative control technologies could not significantly improve the removal efficiency. Our results identified more effective control technologies, which were conductive to alleviating air pollution from cooking emissions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental sciences","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222004090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cooking process can produce abundant volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are harmful to environment and human health. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive analysis in which VOCs emissions from multiple cuisines have been sampled based on the simulation and acquisition platform, involving concentration characteristics, ozone formation potential (OFP) and purification efficiency assessments. VOCs emissions varied from 1828.5 to 14,355.1 µg/m3, with the maximum and minimum values from Barbecue and Family cuisine, respectively. Alkanes and alcohol had higher contributions to VOCs from Sichuan and Hunan cuisine (64.1%), Family cuisine (66.3%), Shandong cuisine (69.1%) and Cantonese cuisine (69.8%), with the dominant VOCs species of ethanol, isobutane and n-butane. In comparison, alcohols (79.5%) were abundant for Huaiyang cuisine, while alkanes (19.7%), alkenes (35.9%) and haloalkanes (22.9%) accounted for higher proportions from Barbecue. Specially, carbon tetrachloride, n-hexylene and 1-butene were the most abundant VOCs species for Barbecue, ranging from 8.8% to 14.6%. The highest OFP occurred in Barbecue. The sensitive species of OFP for Huaiyang cuisine were alcohols, while other cuisines were alkenes. Purification efficiency assessments shed light on the removal differences of individual and synergistic control technologies. VOCs emissions exhibited a strong dependence on the photocatalytic oxidation, with the removal efficiencies of 29.0%–54.4%. However, the high voltage electrostatic, wet purification and mechanical separation techniques played a mediocre or even counterproductive role in the VOCs reduction, meanwhile collaborative control technologies could not significantly improve the removal efficiency. Our results identified more effective control technologies, which were conductive to alleviating air pollution from cooking emissions.

Abstract Image

多种烹饪方式排放的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的化学特性和净化效率评估
烹饪过程中会产生大量的挥发性有机化合物,对环境和人体健康有害。因此,我们基于模拟采集平台对多种烹饪方式的挥发性有机物排放进行了全面分析,包括浓度特征、臭氧形成潜力(OFP)和净化效率评估。挥发性有机物排放量在1828.5至14355.1µg/m3之间,最大值和最小值分别来自烧烤和家庭烹饪。川菜和湘菜(64.1%)、家常菜(66.3%)、鲁菜(69.1%)和粤菜(69.8%)的挥发性有机物中烷烃和酒精的贡献较高,主要挥发性有机物为乙醇、异丁烷和正丁烷。相比之下,淮扬菜中醇类(79.5%)含量较高,而烧烤中烷烃(19.7%)、烯烃(35.9%)和卤代烷烃(22.9%)的比例较高。特别是四氯化碳、正己烯和1-丁烯是烧烤中挥发性有机物含量最高的物种,其含量在8.8%-14.6%之间。淮扬菜中OFP的敏感种类为醇类,其它菜为烯烃。净化效率评估揭示了单独和协同控制技术的去除差异。VOCs的排放对光催化氧化表现出强烈的依赖性,去除率为29.0%-54.4%。然而,高压静电、湿式净化和机械分离技术在降低VOCs方面发挥了中等甚至适得其反的作用,而协同控制技术并不能显著提高去除效率。我们的研究结果确定了更有效的控制技术,这些技术有助于缓解烹饪排放造成的空气污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental sciences
Journal of environmental sciences Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1989. It is sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is jointly published by Elsevier and Science Press. It aims to foster interdisciplinary communication and promote understanding of significant environmental issues. The journal seeks to publish significant and novel research on the fate and behaviour of emerging contaminants, human impact on the environment, human exposure to environmental contaminants and their health effects, and environmental remediation and management. Original research articles, critical reviews, highlights, and perspectives of high quality are published both in print and online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信