Etiological agents and bacterial sensitivity in subclinical mastitis in Brazil: a ten-year systematic review.

Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.12834/VetIt.2601.17023.2
Josiane Ito Eleodoro, Rafael Fagnani
{"title":"Etiological agents and bacterial sensitivity in subclinical mastitis in Brazil: a ten-year systematic review.","authors":"Josiane Ito Eleodoro,&nbsp;Rafael Fagnani","doi":"10.12834/VetIt.2601.17023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considering the high prevalence of subclinical mastitis and its impacts on milk production, thematic studies are need to provide strategic data for its control. This study aimed at investigating the most frequent microorganisms associated with subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Brazil through compiling the occurrence of the etiological agents and their sensitivity to antibiotics. The systematic review includes articles published between 2009 and 2019. Fiftyseven articles evaluating 22,287 milk samples were selected. The number of publications and the sample size were not homogeneous among Brazilian regions. Most of the studies and sampling were conducted in Rio Grande do Sul, whereas no studies were found in some states in the north and mid‑west regions. The most frequent pathogen was Staphylococcus spp. It was isolated in all studies and had an average prevalence of 49% in the analyzed samples. Resistance to penicillin was the most frequent microbial resistance found in Brazil, with an average of 66% among the isolates evaluated. Moreover, bacterial resistance to cephalexin, cefoperazone, erythromycin, gentamicin, neomycin, penicillin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim increased over the research period. Given the territorial extension, the etiological diversity, and the lack of studies with a representative sample, the compilation of scientific data must be interpreted with caution. Regions where a greater number of studies were conducted and with numerous samples, such as the South, provided a comprehensive scenario that is closer to reality. Nevertheless, although decision making on the farm cannot be replaced by scientific studies, it can be supported by such efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.2601.17023.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the high prevalence of subclinical mastitis and its impacts on milk production, thematic studies are need to provide strategic data for its control. This study aimed at investigating the most frequent microorganisms associated with subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Brazil through compiling the occurrence of the etiological agents and their sensitivity to antibiotics. The systematic review includes articles published between 2009 and 2019. Fiftyseven articles evaluating 22,287 milk samples were selected. The number of publications and the sample size were not homogeneous among Brazilian regions. Most of the studies and sampling were conducted in Rio Grande do Sul, whereas no studies were found in some states in the north and mid‑west regions. The most frequent pathogen was Staphylococcus spp. It was isolated in all studies and had an average prevalence of 49% in the analyzed samples. Resistance to penicillin was the most frequent microbial resistance found in Brazil, with an average of 66% among the isolates evaluated. Moreover, bacterial resistance to cephalexin, cefoperazone, erythromycin, gentamicin, neomycin, penicillin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim increased over the research period. Given the territorial extension, the etiological diversity, and the lack of studies with a representative sample, the compilation of scientific data must be interpreted with caution. Regions where a greater number of studies were conducted and with numerous samples, such as the South, provided a comprehensive scenario that is closer to reality. Nevertheless, although decision making on the farm cannot be replaced by scientific studies, it can be supported by such efforts.

分享
查看原文
巴西亚临床乳腺炎的病因和细菌敏感性:十年系统回顾。
考虑到亚临床乳腺炎的高患病率及其对产奶量的影响,需要进行专题研究,为其控制提供战略数据。本研究旨在通过收集巴西奶牛亚临床乳腺炎的病原发生情况及其对抗生素的敏感性,调查与奶牛亚临床乳腺炎相关的最常见微生物。该系统综述包括2009年至2019年发表的文章。选取了57篇评价22,287份牛奶样品的文章。巴西各区域的出版物数量和样本量并不均匀。大多数研究和抽样是在南里奥格兰德州进行的,而在北部和中西部地区的一些州没有发现任何研究。最常见的病原菌为葡萄球菌,在所有研究中均有分离,在分析样本中平均流行率为49%。对青霉素的耐药性是在巴西发现的最常见的微生物耐药性,在评估的分离株中平均为66%。此外,细菌对头孢氨苄、头孢哌酮、红霉素、庆大霉素、新霉素、青霉素、四环素和甲氧苄啶的耐药性在研究期间有所增加。考虑到地域的广广性、病因的多样性以及缺乏具有代表性样本的研究,必须谨慎解释科学数据的汇编。进行了较多研究和抽样较多的区域,如南方,提供了更接近现实的全面设想。然而,尽管科学研究不能取代农场上的决策,但这些努力可以为决策提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信