KRAS mutations and endometriosis burden of disease

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Natasha L Orr, Arianne Albert, Yang Doris Liu, Amy Lum, JooYoon Hong, Catalina L Ionescu, Janine Senz, Tayyebeh M Nazeran, Anna F Lee, Heather Noga, Kate Lawrenson, Catherine Allaire, Christina Williams, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Michael S Anglesio, Paul J Yong
{"title":"KRAS mutations and endometriosis burden of disease","authors":"Natasha L Orr,&nbsp;Arianne Albert,&nbsp;Yang Doris Liu,&nbsp;Amy Lum,&nbsp;JooYoon Hong,&nbsp;Catalina L Ionescu,&nbsp;Janine Senz,&nbsp;Tayyebeh M Nazeran,&nbsp;Anna F Lee,&nbsp;Heather Noga,&nbsp;Kate Lawrenson,&nbsp;Catherine Allaire,&nbsp;Christina Williams,&nbsp;Mohamed A Bedaiwy,&nbsp;Michael S Anglesio,&nbsp;Paul J Yong","doi":"10.1002/cjp2.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The clinical phenotype of somatic mutations in endometriosis is unknown. The objective was to determine whether somatic <i>KRAS</i> mutations were associated with greater disease burden in endometriosis (i.e. more severe subtypes and higher stage). This prospective longitudinal cohort study included 122 subjects undergoing endometriosis surgery at a tertiary referral center between 2013 and 2017, with 5–9 years of follow-up. Somatic activating <i>KRAS</i> codon 12 mutations were detected in endometriosis lesions using droplet digital PCR. <i>KRAS</i> mutation status for each subject was coded as present (<i>KRAS</i> mutation in at least one endometriosis sample in a subject) or absent. Standardized clinical phenotyping for each subject was carried out via linkage to a prospective registry. Primary outcome was anatomic disease burden, based on distribution of subtypes (deep infiltrating endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and superficial peritoneal endometriosis) and surgical staging (Stages I–IV). Secondary outcomes were markers of surgical difficulty, demographics, pain scores, and risk of re-operation. <i>KRAS</i> mutation presence was higher in subjects with deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma lesions only (57.9%; 11/19) and subjects with mixed subtypes (60.6%; 40/66), compared with those with superficial endometriosis only (35.1%; 13/37) (<i>p</i> = 0.04). <i>KRAS</i> mutation was present in 27.6% (8/29) of Stage I cases, in comparison to 65.0% (13/20) of Stage II, 63.0% (17/27) of Stage III, and 58.1% (25/43) of Stage IV cases (<i>p</i> = 0.02). <i>KRAS</i> mutation was also associated with greater surgical difficulty (ureterolysis) (relative risk [RR] = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02–2.11) and non-Caucasian ethnicity (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.89). Pain severities did not differ based on <i>KRAS</i> mutation status, at either baseline or follow-up. Re-operation rates were low overall, occurring in 17.2% with <i>KRAS</i> mutation compared with 10.3% without (RR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.66–4.21). In conclusion, <i>KRAS</i> mutations were associated with greater anatomic severity of endometriosis, resulting in increased surgical difficulty. Somatic cancer-driver mutations may inform a future molecular classification of endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"9 4","pages":"302-312"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.317","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The clinical phenotype of somatic mutations in endometriosis is unknown. The objective was to determine whether somatic KRAS mutations were associated with greater disease burden in endometriosis (i.e. more severe subtypes and higher stage). This prospective longitudinal cohort study included 122 subjects undergoing endometriosis surgery at a tertiary referral center between 2013 and 2017, with 5–9 years of follow-up. Somatic activating KRAS codon 12 mutations were detected in endometriosis lesions using droplet digital PCR. KRAS mutation status for each subject was coded as present (KRAS mutation in at least one endometriosis sample in a subject) or absent. Standardized clinical phenotyping for each subject was carried out via linkage to a prospective registry. Primary outcome was anatomic disease burden, based on distribution of subtypes (deep infiltrating endometriosis, ovarian endometrioma, and superficial peritoneal endometriosis) and surgical staging (Stages I–IV). Secondary outcomes were markers of surgical difficulty, demographics, pain scores, and risk of re-operation. KRAS mutation presence was higher in subjects with deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma lesions only (57.9%; 11/19) and subjects with mixed subtypes (60.6%; 40/66), compared with those with superficial endometriosis only (35.1%; 13/37) (p = 0.04). KRAS mutation was present in 27.6% (8/29) of Stage I cases, in comparison to 65.0% (13/20) of Stage II, 63.0% (17/27) of Stage III, and 58.1% (25/43) of Stage IV cases (p = 0.02). KRAS mutation was also associated with greater surgical difficulty (ureterolysis) (relative risk [RR] = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02–2.11) and non-Caucasian ethnicity (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.89). Pain severities did not differ based on KRAS mutation status, at either baseline or follow-up. Re-operation rates were low overall, occurring in 17.2% with KRAS mutation compared with 10.3% without (RR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.66–4.21). In conclusion, KRAS mutations were associated with greater anatomic severity of endometriosis, resulting in increased surgical difficulty. Somatic cancer-driver mutations may inform a future molecular classification of endometriosis.

Abstract Image

KRAS突变与子宫内膜异位症的疾病负担
子宫内膜异位症中体细胞突变的临床表型尚不清楚。目的是确定体细胞KRAS突变是否与子宫内膜异位症中更大的疾病负担相关(即更严重的亚型和更高的分期)。这项前瞻性纵向队列研究纳入了2013年至2017年在三级转诊中心接受子宫内膜异位症手术的122名受试者,随访5-9年。应用微滴数字PCR检测子宫内膜异位症病变中体细胞活化KRAS密码子12突变。每个受试者的KRAS突变状态被编码为存在(每位受试者中至少有一个子宫内膜异位症样本中存在KRAS突变)或不存在。通过与前瞻性注册表的联系,对每个受试者进行标准化临床表型分析。主要结局是解剖性疾病负担,基于亚型分布(深浸润性子宫内膜异位症、卵巢子宫内膜异位症和浅表性腹膜子宫内膜异位症)和手术分期(I-IV期)。次要结局是手术难度、人口统计学、疼痛评分和再手术风险的标志。KRAS突变仅在深浸润性子宫内膜异位症或子宫内膜瘤病变中较高(57.9%;11/19)和混合亚型受试者(60.6%;40/66),而仅浅表性子宫内膜异位症(35.1%;13/37), p = 0.04。KRAS突变在I期患者中占27.6%(8/29),而在II期患者中占65.0%(13/20),在III期患者中占63.0%(17/27),在IV期患者中占58.1% (25/43)(p = 0.02)。KRAS突变还与手术难度较大(输尿管溶解)(相对危险度[RR] = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02-2.11)和非高加索人种(RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.89)相关。无论是基线还是随访,KRAS突变状态对疼痛的严重程度都没有影响。总体而言,KRAS突变患者的再手术率较低,为17.2%,未突变患者为10.3% (RR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.66-4.21)。总之,KRAS突变与子宫内膜异位症的解剖严重程度相关,导致手术难度增加。体细胞癌驱动突变可能为子宫内膜异位症的未来分子分类提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信