Thrombus migration in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
ZeFeng Tan, Lei Zhang, Li'an Huang, Hongyu Qiao, Min Guan, Bing Yang, Pengfei Yang, Yongwei Zhang, Hongjian Shen, Yu Zhou, Bo Hong, Huaizhang Shi, Hongxing Han, Xinyi Leng, Yi Dong, Changlin Lian, Wenhuo Chen, Anding Xu, Jianmin Liu
{"title":"Thrombus migration in patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy.","authors":"ZeFeng Tan, Lei Zhang, Li'an Huang, Hongyu Qiao, Min Guan, Bing Yang, Pengfei Yang, Yongwei Zhang, Hongjian Shen, Yu Zhou, Bo Hong, Huaizhang Shi, Hongxing Han, Xinyi Leng, Yi Dong, Changlin Lian, Wenhuo Chen, Anding Xu, Jianmin Liu","doi":"10.1136/svn-2022-002257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The impact of thrombus migration (TM) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on clinical outcomes and revascularisation rates remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether preinterventional TM modifies the treatment effects of direct EVT versus bridging EVT in acute large vessel occlusion patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing catheter angiography in the Direct Intra-arterial thrombectomy in order to Revascularise acute ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary hospitals: A Multicentre randomised clinical Trial were included. TM was determined by radiologists unaware of the study by analysing discrepancies between computed tomographic angiography at baseline and first-run digital subtraction angiography before EVT. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) assessed at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 627 included patients, the TM rate was 11.3% (71/627). In the multivariable logistic regression model, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.916 to 0.999; p=0.043) and intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted OR 2.614, 95% CI 1.514 to 4.514; p<0.001) were independently associated with TM. The patients with TM were less likely to be completely recanalised than those without TM (21.27% vs 36.23%, p=0.040). The interaction of TM and the EVT treatment effect did not significantly affect mRS shift analysis (p=0.687) or mRS scores of 0 to 1 (p=0.436).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preinterventional TM does not modify the treatment effects of direct versus bridging EVT on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with anterior large vessel occlusion. TM leads to a lower complete recanalisation rate.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":22021,"journal":{"name":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"126-133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11103155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke and Vascular Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2022-002257","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The impact of thrombus migration (TM) prior to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) on clinical outcomes and revascularisation rates remains unknown. We aimed to examine whether preinterventional TM modifies the treatment effects of direct EVT versus bridging EVT in acute large vessel occlusion patients.

Methods: All patients undergoing catheter angiography in the Direct Intra-arterial thrombectomy in order to Revascularise acute ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion Efficiently in Chinese Tertiary hospitals: A Multicentre randomised clinical Trial were included. TM was determined by radiologists unaware of the study by analysing discrepancies between computed tomographic angiography at baseline and first-run digital subtraction angiography before EVT. The primary outcome was the score on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) assessed at 90 days.

Results: Of 627 included patients, the TM rate was 11.3% (71/627). In the multivariable logistic regression model, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (adjusted OR 0.956, 95% CI 0.916 to 0.999; p=0.043) and intravenous thrombolysis (adjusted OR 2.614, 95% CI 1.514 to 4.514; p<0.001) were independently associated with TM. The patients with TM were less likely to be completely recanalised than those without TM (21.27% vs 36.23%, p=0.040). The interaction of TM and the EVT treatment effect did not significantly affect mRS shift analysis (p=0.687) or mRS scores of 0 to 1 (p=0.436).

Conclusion: Preinterventional TM does not modify the treatment effects of direct versus bridging EVT on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with anterior large vessel occlusion. TM leads to a lower complete recanalisation rate.

Trial registration number:

接受血管内血栓切除术的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的血栓迁移。
目的:血管内血栓切除术(EVT)前血栓迁移(TM)对临床预后和血管再通率的影响仍然未知。我们旨在研究在急性大血管闭塞患者中,介入前血栓迁移是否会改变直接EVT与桥接EVT的治疗效果:方法:所有在中国三级医院接受导管血管造影术的患者:多中心随机临床试验》。TM由不了解该研究的放射科医生通过分析基线计算机断层扫描血管造影与EVT前首次数字减影血管造影之间的差异来确定。主要结果是90天后的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分:在纳入的 627 名患者中,TM 发生率为 11.3%(71/627)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(调整后 OR 0.956,95% CI 0.916 至 0.999;p=0.043)和静脉溶栓(调整后 OR 2.614,95% CI 1.514 至 4.514;p结论:介入前 TM 不会改变患者的卒中评分:介入前TM不会改变直接EVT与桥接EVT对急性缺血性卒中前大血管闭塞患者功能预后的治疗效果。TM导致的完全再通率较低:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke and Vascular Neurology
Stroke and Vascular Neurology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Stroke and Vascular Neurology (SVN) is the official journal of the Chinese Stroke Association. Supported by a team of renowned Editors, and fully Open Access, the journal encourages debate on controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信