Home exercises for neck pain: A Delphi survey.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra, Thania Maion de Souza Melo, Vanessa Maria da Silva Alves Gomes, Ray Cosme da Pas, Laura Izabel do Nascimento Alves, Marianna de Melo Salemi, Iditácylla Reis Silva, Angélica da Silva Tenório, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira
{"title":"Home exercises for neck pain: A Delphi survey.","authors":"Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra,&nbsp;Thania Maion de Souza Melo,&nbsp;Vanessa Maria da Silva Alves Gomes,&nbsp;Ray Cosme da Pas,&nbsp;Laura Izabel do Nascimento Alves,&nbsp;Marianna de Melo Salemi,&nbsp;Iditácylla Reis Silva,&nbsp;Angélica da Silva Tenório,&nbsp;Gisela Rocha de Siqueira","doi":"10.1002/pri.1982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current context of the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need for home exercise strategies for the relief of neck pain, which, in recent times, has increased. However, there is a gap regarding home exercises that are aimed at reducing neck pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop, validate and culturally adapt a home exercise protocol for neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational study conducted in three stages: (1) Developing an online search of databases for articles on neck pain exercises. (2) Validating a panel of 12 physical therapists, using the Delphi technique, and (3) Cultural adaptation, through face-to-face assessment with individuals aged 18-30 years with neck pain (n = 15). This resulted in the production of a final version of the protocol. Consensus on the protocol items (using the five-point Likert scale) was considered when the percent agreement was equal to or greater than 75%. Individuals were also asked about pain intensity during the last week before and after performing the protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A protocol was developed with the principles of neck and scapular stabilization and upper limb movements, for a period of 4 weeks. Nine physical therapists completed two rounds online, and all items in the second version of the protocol presented an agreement of over 75%. The protocol was culturally adapted by the target population, in which 73% of individuals presented pain reduction with a minimally clinically important difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 4-week home exercise protocol was created based on the best evidence in the literature, was validated by physical therapists and adapted for the population with neck pain. It proved to be an understandable, useful, practical and convenient tool in the treatment of this disorder and demonstrated an improvement in neck pain.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>GOV: (NCT04187001).</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"28 2","pages":"e1982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The current context of the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need for home exercise strategies for the relief of neck pain, which, in recent times, has increased. However, there is a gap regarding home exercises that are aimed at reducing neck pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop, validate and culturally adapt a home exercise protocol for neck pain.

Methods: This was an observational study conducted in three stages: (1) Developing an online search of databases for articles on neck pain exercises. (2) Validating a panel of 12 physical therapists, using the Delphi technique, and (3) Cultural adaptation, through face-to-face assessment with individuals aged 18-30 years with neck pain (n = 15). This resulted in the production of a final version of the protocol. Consensus on the protocol items (using the five-point Likert scale) was considered when the percent agreement was equal to or greater than 75%. Individuals were also asked about pain intensity during the last week before and after performing the protocol.

Results: A protocol was developed with the principles of neck and scapular stabilization and upper limb movements, for a period of 4 weeks. Nine physical therapists completed two rounds online, and all items in the second version of the protocol presented an agreement of over 75%. The protocol was culturally adapted by the target population, in which 73% of individuals presented pain reduction with a minimally clinically important difference.

Conclusion: A 4-week home exercise protocol was created based on the best evidence in the literature, was validated by physical therapists and adapted for the population with neck pain. It proved to be an understandable, useful, practical and convenient tool in the treatment of this disorder and demonstrated an improvement in neck pain.

Clinicaltrials: GOV: (NCT04187001).

颈部疼痛的家庭运动:德尔菲调查。
目的:在COVID-19大流行的当前背景下,需要采取家庭锻炼策略来缓解颈部疼痛,最近颈部疼痛有所增加。然而,在减少颈部疼痛的家庭锻炼方面存在差距。因此,本研究的目的是开发、验证和适应颈部疼痛的家庭运动方案。方法:这是一项观察性研究,分三个阶段进行:(1)开发在线搜索数据库,检索有关颈部疼痛练习的文章。(2)验证一个由12名物理治疗师组成的小组,使用德尔菲技术;(3)文化适应,通过面对面评估18-30岁的颈部疼痛患者(n = 15)。这导致了协议最终版本的产生。协议项目的共识(使用五点李克特量表)被认为是当百分比协议等于或大于75%。在执行方案之前和之后的最后一周,个人也被问及疼痛强度。结果:我们制定了一个方案,以颈部和肩胛骨稳定和上肢活动为原则,为期4周。九名物理治疗师在线完成了两轮测试,第二版协议中的所有项目都有75%以上的一致性。该方案在文化上适应了目标人群,其中73%的个体表现出疼痛减轻,具有最小的临床重要差异。结论:基于文献中最好的证据,经过物理治疗师的验证,并适用于颈部疼痛人群,创建了为期4周的家庭锻炼方案。它被证明是一种可以理解的、有用的、实用的、方便的治疗这种疾病的工具,并证明了颈部疼痛的改善。临床试验:GOV: (NCT04187001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信