Relationship between Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Serum Copper Level as an Indicator of Silicosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ali Poormohammadi, Erfan Ayubi, Mohammad Javad Assari, Fereshteh Mehri, Effat Sadat Mir Moeini, Homa Naderifar
{"title":"Relationship between Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica and Serum Copper Level as an Indicator of Silicosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ali Poormohammadi,&nbsp;Erfan Ayubi,&nbsp;Mohammad Javad Assari,&nbsp;Fereshteh Mehri,&nbsp;Effat Sadat Mir Moeini,&nbsp;Homa Naderifar","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_99_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis study evaluates a relationship between occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and serum copper (Cu) levels as an indicator for early detection of silicosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted, and the quality of results was evaluated in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The following databases were searched, including Web of Sciences, Scopus, and PubMed from inception until November 2021. The following keywords were selected for searching in the mentioned databases including, \"copper\" OR \"serum copper\" AND \"silicosis\". The mean (standard deviation [SD]) of Cu was extracted for both silicosis and non-silicosis subjects. The differences in mean effect size were pooled using the random-effect model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using the I<sup>2</sup> value and Begg's test and Egger's test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 159 studies were initially found, among which eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effect meta-analysis of these eight studies showed that silicosis patients had higher copper levels than the non-silicosis group with a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of 3.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.25, 5.78); I<sup>2</sup> = 99.3%, <i>P</i> value < 0.001. The subgroup analysis showed that the corresponding figures in those with mean age >40 years and <40 years were 5.79 (2.06, 9.52) and -0.43 (-4.57, 3.70), respectively. Moreover, no publication bias was found in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the present study demonstrated that silica exposure may be associated with increasing serum Cu levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"4-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_99_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis study evaluates a relationship between occupational exposure to respirable crystalline silica and serum copper (Cu) levels as an indicator for early detection of silicosis.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted, and the quality of results was evaluated in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The following databases were searched, including Web of Sciences, Scopus, and PubMed from inception until November 2021. The following keywords were selected for searching in the mentioned databases including, "copper" OR "serum copper" AND "silicosis". The mean (standard deviation [SD]) of Cu was extracted for both silicosis and non-silicosis subjects. The differences in mean effect size were pooled using the random-effect model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using the I2 value and Begg's test and Egger's test, respectively.

Results: A total of 159 studies were initially found, among which eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effect meta-analysis of these eight studies showed that silicosis patients had higher copper levels than the non-silicosis group with a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of 3.02 (95% confidence interval: 0.25, 5.78); I2 = 99.3%, P value < 0.001. The subgroup analysis showed that the corresponding figures in those with mean age >40 years and <40 years were 5.79 (2.06, 9.52) and -0.43 (-4.57, 3.70), respectively. Moreover, no publication bias was found in the analyses.

Conclusions: The results of the present study demonstrated that silica exposure may be associated with increasing serum Cu levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

职业接触可吸入结晶二氧化硅与血清铜水平作为矽肺指标的关系:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:这项系统综述和荟萃分析研究评估了职业接触可吸入结晶二氧化硅与血清铜(Cu)水平之间的关系,作为早期检测矽肺的指标。材料和方法:进行系统检索,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南评估结果质量。从成立到2021年11月,搜索了以下数据库,包括科学网、Scopus和PubMed。选择以下关键词在上述数据库中进行搜索,包括“铜”或“血清铜”和“矽肺病”。提取矽肺和非矽肺受试者的Cu平均值(标准差[SD])。使用随机效应模型汇总平均效应大小的差异。分别使用I2值、Begg检验和Egger检验评估异质性和发表偏倚。结果:最初共发现159项研究,其中8项研究被纳入荟萃分析。这八项研究的随机效应荟萃分析显示,矽肺患者的铜水平高于非矽肺组,合并标准化平均差(SMD)为3.02(95%置信区间:0.25,5.78);I2=99.3%,P值<0.001。亚组分析显示,平均年龄>40岁的患者的相应数据和结论:本研究的结果表明,二氧化硅暴露可能与血清铜水平升高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信