The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass.

Mona Sarkiss, Carlos A Jimenez
{"title":"The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass.","authors":"Mona Sarkiss,&nbsp;Carlos A Jimenez","doi":"10.21037/med-22-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anesthesia management of patients with mediastinal mass compressing the central airway is considered challenging. It is widely believed that general anesthesia induction in patients with mediastinal mass is associated with airway collapse, difficulty in ventilation and hemodynamic compromise. Additionally, several case reports and case series described patients demise after induction of general anesthesia. This has led to the strong recommendations to use inhalation induction, avoid the use of muscle relaxant and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Recent studies shed new light on our understanding of airway changes associated with mediastinal mass by directly visualizing and measuring the actual changes of the airway caliber and the variation in the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with mediastinal mass. These studies describe the changes in airway mechanics in different states e.g., awake and anesthetized, spontaneous and positive pressure ventilated with or without muscle relaxation. Interesting new findings in these recent publications show that general anesthesia with and without muscle relaxation does not worsen a pre-existing narrowing of the airway compressed by mediastinal mass. Moreover, it was discovered that the addition of positive pressure ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and muscle relaxation in an anesthetized patient were associated with improvement in the airway caliber and airflow in these patient's population. This new understanding of the mechanics of airway obstruction and the effects of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on patients with mediastinal mass challenges our current anesthesia practices and leads us to consider a new approach to anesthetize and ventilate these patients. This article will review the past literature that led to the widely practiced current anesthesia techniques and how it is challenged with the new research. The author will also provide a new perspective and anesthesia technique that align with the new research findings for safe induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients with mediastinal mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":74139,"journal":{"name":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","volume":"7 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/6f/med-07-16.PMC10226893.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/med-22-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anesthesia management of patients with mediastinal mass compressing the central airway is considered challenging. It is widely believed that general anesthesia induction in patients with mediastinal mass is associated with airway collapse, difficulty in ventilation and hemodynamic compromise. Additionally, several case reports and case series described patients demise after induction of general anesthesia. This has led to the strong recommendations to use inhalation induction, avoid the use of muscle relaxant and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Recent studies shed new light on our understanding of airway changes associated with mediastinal mass by directly visualizing and measuring the actual changes of the airway caliber and the variation in the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with mediastinal mass. These studies describe the changes in airway mechanics in different states e.g., awake and anesthetized, spontaneous and positive pressure ventilated with or without muscle relaxation. Interesting new findings in these recent publications show that general anesthesia with and without muscle relaxation does not worsen a pre-existing narrowing of the airway compressed by mediastinal mass. Moreover, it was discovered that the addition of positive pressure ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and muscle relaxation in an anesthetized patient were associated with improvement in the airway caliber and airflow in these patient's population. This new understanding of the mechanics of airway obstruction and the effects of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on patients with mediastinal mass challenges our current anesthesia practices and leads us to consider a new approach to anesthetize and ventilate these patients. This article will review the past literature that led to the widely practiced current anesthesia techniques and how it is challenged with the new research. The author will also provide a new perspective and anesthesia technique that align with the new research findings for safe induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients with mediastinal mass.

前纵隔肿块麻醉处理的进展。
纵隔肿块压迫中央气道患者的麻醉管理被认为是具有挑战性的。人们普遍认为,纵隔肿块患者的全麻诱导与气道塌陷、通气困难和血流动力学损害有关。此外,一些病例报告和病例系列描述了患者在全身麻醉诱导后死亡。这导致强烈建议使用吸入诱导,避免使用肌肉松弛剂和维持自发通气。最近的研究通过直接观察和测量纵隔肿块患者气道直径的实际变化以及吸气峰流量(PIF)和呼气峰流量(PEF)的变化,为我们对纵隔肿块相关气道变化的理解提供了新的视角。这些研究描述了不同状态下气道力学的变化,如清醒和麻醉,自发和正压通气有或没有肌肉松弛。这些最近发表的有趣的新发现表明,全身麻醉有或没有肌肉松弛并不会加重由纵隔肿块压迫的预先存在的气道狭窄。此外,研究发现,在麻醉患者中增加正压通气、呼气末正压(PEEP)和肌肉松弛与这些患者的气道口径和气流改善有关。这种对气道阻塞机制的新认识以及麻醉和机械通气对纵隔肿块患者的影响挑战了我们目前的麻醉实践,并促使我们考虑一种新的方法来麻醉和通气这些患者。这篇文章将回顾过去的文献,导致目前的麻醉技术的广泛应用,以及如何与新的研究挑战。作者还将结合新的研究成果,为纵隔肿块患者安全诱导和维持全身麻醉提供新的视角和麻醉技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信