The Use of Putative Dialysis Initiation Time in Comparative Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Methodological Aspects.

Danh V Nguyen, Esra Kurum, Damla Senturk
{"title":"The Use of Putative Dialysis Initiation Time in Comparative Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Methodological Aspects.","authors":"Danh V Nguyen,&nbsp;Esra Kurum,&nbsp;Damla Senturk","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2022.11.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The latest data from the United States Renal Data Systems show over 134,000 individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) starting dialysis in the year 2019. ESKD patients on dialysis, the default treatment strategy, have high mortality and hospitalization, especially in the first year of dialysis. An alternative treatment strategy is (non-dialysis) conservative management (CM). The relative effectiveness of CM with respect to various patient outcomes, including survival, hospitalization, and health-related quality of life among others, especially in elderly ESKD or advanced chronic kidney disease patients with serious comorbidities, is an active area of research. A technical challenge inherent in comparing patient outcomes between CM and dialysis patient groups is that the start of follow-up time is \"not defined\" for patients on CM because they do not initiate dialysis. One solution is the use of putative dialysis initiation (PDI) time. In this work, we examine the validity of the use of PDI time to determine the start of follow-up for longitudinal retrospective and prospective cohort studies involving CM. We propose and assess the efficacy of estimating PDI time using linear mixed effects model of kidney function decline over time via simulation studies. We also illustrate how the estimated PDI time can be used to effectively estimate the survival distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":73480,"journal":{"name":"International journal of statistics in medical research","volume":"11 ","pages":"128-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of statistics in medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2022.11.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latest data from the United States Renal Data Systems show over 134,000 individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) starting dialysis in the year 2019. ESKD patients on dialysis, the default treatment strategy, have high mortality and hospitalization, especially in the first year of dialysis. An alternative treatment strategy is (non-dialysis) conservative management (CM). The relative effectiveness of CM with respect to various patient outcomes, including survival, hospitalization, and health-related quality of life among others, especially in elderly ESKD or advanced chronic kidney disease patients with serious comorbidities, is an active area of research. A technical challenge inherent in comparing patient outcomes between CM and dialysis patient groups is that the start of follow-up time is "not defined" for patients on CM because they do not initiate dialysis. One solution is the use of putative dialysis initiation (PDI) time. In this work, we examine the validity of the use of PDI time to determine the start of follow-up for longitudinal retrospective and prospective cohort studies involving CM. We propose and assess the efficacy of estimating PDI time using linear mixed effects model of kidney function decline over time via simulation studies. We also illustrate how the estimated PDI time can be used to effectively estimate the survival distribution.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用假定的透析起始时间在晚期慢性肾病患者的比较结果:方法学方面。
美国肾脏数据系统的最新数据显示,2019年有超过13.4万名终末期肾病(ESKD)患者开始透析。接受透析治疗的ESKD患者死亡率和住院率很高,特别是在透析的第一年。另一个治疗策略是(非透析)保守管理(CM)。CM对各种患者结果的相对有效性,包括生存、住院和健康相关的生活质量等,特别是在老年ESKD或有严重合并症的晚期慢性肾脏疾病患者中,是一个活跃的研究领域。比较CM患者组和透析患者组之间的患者结果所固有的技术挑战是,CM患者的随访开始时间“未定义”,因为他们不开始透析。一种解决方案是使用假定的透析起始(PDI)时间。在这项工作中,我们检验了使用PDI时间来确定涉及CM的纵向回顾性和前瞻性队列研究的随访开始的有效性。我们通过模拟研究提出并评估了使用肾功能随时间下降的线性混合效应模型估计PDI时间的有效性。我们还说明了如何使用估计的PDI时间来有效地估计生存分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信