Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial.

IF 8.3 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Fenna M Jansen, Reinier C A van Linschoten, Wietske Kievit, Lisa J T Smits, Renske W M Pauwels, Dirk J de Jong, Annemarie C de Vries, Paul J Boekema, Rachel L West, Alexander G L Bodelier, Ingrid A M Gisbertz, Frank H J Wolfhagen, Tessa E H Römkens, Maurice W M D Lutgens, Adriaan A van Bodegraven, Bas Oldenburg, Marieke J Pierik, Maurice G V M Russel, Nanne K de Boer, Rosalie C Mallant-Hent, Pieter C J Ter Borg, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Jeroen M Jansen, Sita V Jansen, Adrianus C I T L Tan, Frank Hoentjen, C Janneke van der Woude
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial.","authors":"Fenna M Jansen, Reinier C A van Linschoten, Wietske Kievit, Lisa J T Smits, Renske W M Pauwels, Dirk J de Jong, Annemarie C de Vries, Paul J Boekema, Rachel L West, Alexander G L Bodelier, Ingrid A M Gisbertz, Frank H J Wolfhagen, Tessa E H Römkens, Maurice W M D Lutgens, Adriaan A van Bodegraven, Bas Oldenburg, Marieke J Pierik, Maurice G V M Russel, Nanne K de Boer, Rosalie C Mallant-Hent, Pieter C J Ter Borg, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Jeroen M Jansen, Sita V Jansen, Adrianus C I T L Tan, Frank Hoentjen, C Janneke van der Woude","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.</p>","PeriodicalId":15547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","volume":" ","pages":"1771-1780"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission.

Design: We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels.

Results: We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective.

Conclusion: When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission.

Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.

克罗恩病患者稳定缓解期增加阿达木单抗剂量间隔的成本-效果分析:随机对照LADI试验
背景和目的:我们旨在评估在临床和生化缓解稳定的克罗恩病(CD)患者中,与常规给药间隔相比,增加阿达木单抗给药间隔的成本效益。设计:我们进行了一项实用的、开放标签的、随机对照的非劣效性试验,比较临床缓解的成年CD患者增加阿达木单抗间隔和2周间隔。用EQ-5D-5L测量生活质量。成本是从社会角度来衡量的。结果显示,在接受WTA的相关意愿水平上,差异和增量净货币效益[iNMB]。结果:174例患者随机分为干预组[n = 113]和对照组[n = 61]。在效用方面没有发现差异(差异:-0.017,95%置信区间[-0.044;0.004])和总成本(- 943欧元,[- 2226欧元;€1367]),两组之间在48周的研究期间。每位患者的药物费用较低(- 2545欧元,[- 2780欧元;- 2192欧元]),但非药物保健(+ 474欧元,[+ 149欧元;+€952])和患者费用(+€365[+€92;[1058欧元])更高。成本效用分析显示,国际货币基金组织(iNMB)为594欧元[- 2099欧元;€2050],€69[-€2908;1965欧元]和- 455欧元[- 4096欧元;[1984年],WTA标准分别为2万欧元、5万欧元和8万欧元。在每个质量调整生命年的WTA水平低于53,960欧元时,增加阿达木单抗剂量间隔更有可能具有成本效益。在53,960欧元以上继续使用常规剂量间隔可能更具成本效益。结论:当质量调整生命年损失小于53,960欧元时,对于临床和生化缓解稳定的CD患者,增加阿达木单抗剂量间隔是一种具有成本效益的策略。临床试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov,编号NCT03172377。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Crohns & Colitis
Journal of Crohns & Colitis 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1048
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Crohns and Colitis is concerned with the dissemination of knowledge on clinical, basic science and innovative methods related to inflammatory bowel diseases. The journal publishes original articles, review papers, editorials, leading articles, viewpoints, case reports, innovative methods and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信