The evolution of the criteria for identifying the new concept of `Neonatal Near Miss`: a systematic review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Kawtar Chafik, Fatima Barich, Fatima Aslaou, Fatima Zahra Laamiri, Amina Barkat
{"title":"The evolution of the criteria for identifying the new concept of `Neonatal Near Miss`: a systematic review.","authors":"Kawtar Chafik,&nbsp;Fatima Barich,&nbsp;Fatima Aslaou,&nbsp;Fatima Zahra Laamiri,&nbsp;Amina Barkat","doi":"10.24953/turkjped.2022.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of Near Miss, has been used in the field of obstetrics as a tool for assessing and improving the quality of care. However, there is no standardized definition or international criteria for identifying neonatal near misses. The current review aims to investigate the development of the neonatal near miss concept based on the results of studies conducted so far on neonatal near misses and their identification criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two articles were retrieved by the electronic search, and after examination of different abstracts and reading of full texts, 17 articles were considered eligible meeting our inclusion criteria. All selected articles varied in terms of concept definition and criteria used. Neonatal Near Miss was defined as any newborn with pragmatic and/or management criteria who survived the first 27 days of life. All studies reviewed showed a Neonatal Near Miss rate that was 2.6 to 10 times higher than the neonatal mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neonatal Near Miss is a new concept that is currently being debated. There is a need for universal consensus on the definition and its identification criteria. Further efforts are needed to standardize the definition of this concept, including the development of criteria that can be assessed in a neonatal care setting. This is to improve the quality of neonatal care in every setting, regardless of the local level.</p>","PeriodicalId":49409,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"65 2","pages":"181-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjped.2022.182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The concept of Near Miss, has been used in the field of obstetrics as a tool for assessing and improving the quality of care. However, there is no standardized definition or international criteria for identifying neonatal near misses. The current review aims to investigate the development of the neonatal near miss concept based on the results of studies conducted so far on neonatal near misses and their identification criteria.

Results: Sixty-two articles were retrieved by the electronic search, and after examination of different abstracts and reading of full texts, 17 articles were considered eligible meeting our inclusion criteria. All selected articles varied in terms of concept definition and criteria used. Neonatal Near Miss was defined as any newborn with pragmatic and/or management criteria who survived the first 27 days of life. All studies reviewed showed a Neonatal Near Miss rate that was 2.6 to 10 times higher than the neonatal mortality rate.

Conclusions: Neonatal Near Miss is a new concept that is currently being debated. There is a need for universal consensus on the definition and its identification criteria. Further efforts are needed to standardize the definition of this concept, including the development of criteria that can be assessed in a neonatal care setting. This is to improve the quality of neonatal care in every setting, regardless of the local level.

识别“新生儿近错过”新概念标准的演变:系统回顾。
背景:近错过的概念,已被用于产科领域作为评估和提高护理质量的工具。然而,没有标准化的定义或国际标准,以确定新生儿险些脱险。本综述旨在根据迄今为止对新生儿近靶及其识别标准的研究结果,探讨新生儿近靶概念的发展。结果:通过电子检索检索到62篇文章,经过不同摘要的审查和全文的阅读,17篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。所有选定的条目在概念定义和使用的标准方面各不相同。新生儿近错过被定义为任何符合实用和/或管理标准的新生儿,在生命的前27天存活。所有的研究都表明,新生儿差点漏诊率是新生儿死亡率的2.6到10倍。结论:新生儿近Miss是目前正在讨论的一个新概念。有必要就该定义及其识别标准达成普遍协商一致意见。需要进一步努力使这一概念的定义标准化,包括制定可在新生儿护理环境中进行评估的标准。这是为了提高每一种环境下的新生儿护理质量,无论地方水平如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is a multidisciplinary, peer reviewed, open access journal that seeks to publish research to advance the field of Pediatrics. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, review of the literature, short communications, clinicopathological exercises and letter to the editor in the field of pediatrics. Articles published in this journal are evaluated in an independent and unbiased, double blinded peer-reviewed fashion by an advisory committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信