Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature.

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2023-04-19 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2023-0004
Anne-Cecile Ezanno, Brice Malgras, Marc Pocard
{"title":"Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, reasons for interrupting treatment: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Anne-Cecile Ezanno, Brice Malgras, Marc Pocard","doi":"10.1515/pp-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including \"PIPAC\" and \"pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.\"</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients' wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…).</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"8 2","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including "PIPAC" and "pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy."

Content: Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC.

Summary: The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients' wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…).

Outlook: Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腹腔内加压气溶胶化疗,中断治疗的原因:文献系统回顾。
目的:腹腔内加压气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)在治疗腹膜转移(PM)方面取得了令人鼓舞的效果。根据目前的建议,PIPAC 至少需要 3 个疗程。然而,有些患者没有完成整个疗程,只进行了 1 或 2 次治疗就停止了,因此获益有限。我们进行了一项文献综述,检索词包括 "PIPAC "和 "加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗":仅分析了描述PIPAC治疗提前终止原因的文章。系统检索发现了26篇已发表的与PIPAC相关的临床文章,并报告了停止PIPAC治疗的原因。摘要:这些系列文章涉及11至144名患者,共有1352名各种肿瘤患者接受了PIPAC治疗。共进行了 3088 次 PIPAC 治疗。每位患者接受 PIPAC 治疗的中位数为 2.1 次,首次接受 PIPAC 治疗时的 PCI 评分中位数为 19 分,未完成推荐的 3 次 PIPAC 治疗的患者人数为 714 人(52.8%)。疾病进展是提前终止 PIPAC 治疗的主要原因(49.1%)。其他原因包括死亡、患者意愿、不良事件、转为根治性细胞切除手术以及其他医疗原因(栓塞、肺部感染等......):展望:有必要开展进一步调查,以更好地了解中断 PIPAC 治疗的原因,并改进对最有可能从 PIPAC 中获益的患者的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信