Mechanical Thrombectomy Treatment More than 16 h after Last Known Well for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion.

IF 2 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000531153
Takehiro Katano, Kentaro Suzuki, Ryutaro Kimura, Tomonari Saito, Yasuhiro Nishiyama, Kazumi Kimura
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy Treatment More than 16 h after Last Known Well for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Takehiro Katano, Kentaro Suzuki, Ryutaro Kimura, Tomonari Saito, Yasuhiro Nishiyama, Kazumi Kimura","doi":"10.1159/000531153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been reported to be effective within 24 h after last known well (LKW) by the DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment with Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention with Trevo) trial and within 16 h after LKW by the DEFUSE-3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trial. However, there have been few reports of MT more than 16 h after LKW, and the efficacy and safety of MT more than 24 h after LKW have not yet been demonstrated. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of MT more than 16 h after LKW.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Nippon Medical School Hospital MT registry from April 2011 to August 2022, consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) and prehospital modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 were enrolled. Patients were classified into the following three groups: early group (LKW &lt;6 h), middle group (LKW 6-16 h), and late group (LKW &gt;16 h). The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among these three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 778 patients in the MT registry, 624 were enrolled. The early group included 432 patients, the middle group included 123 patients, and the late group included 69 patients. The patients had a median age of 77 years (interquartile range, 68-83), and 359 were male (57.5%). The median prehospital mRS score was 1 (interquartile range, 1-1), median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 17 (interquartile range, 10-23), and median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was 10 (interquartile range, 8-10). Regarding safety and efficacy, the proportions of cases with successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3; 85.4% vs. 92.7% vs. 88.7%; p = 0.47), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (6.4% vs. 5.7% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.99), mRS score ≤3 at 90 days (52.0% vs. 60.2% vs. 44.9%; p = 0.11), and mRS score of 6 at 90 days (11.3% vs. 10.6 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.37) were not significantly different between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received MT more than 16 h after LKW experienced the same safety and efficacy as those who received MT at 0-16 h after LKW. MT more than 16 h after LKW may be safe and effective for stroke patients with LVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":" ","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9f/9a/cee-2023-0013-0001-531153.PMC10601849.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000531153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has been reported to be effective within 24 h after last known well (LKW) by the DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment with Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention with Trevo) trial and within 16 h after LKW by the DEFUSE-3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) trial. However, there have been few reports of MT more than 16 h after LKW, and the efficacy and safety of MT more than 24 h after LKW have not yet been demonstrated. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of MT more than 16 h after LKW.

Methods: Using data from the Nippon Medical School Hospital MT registry from April 2011 to August 2022, consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) and prehospital modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 were enrolled. Patients were classified into the following three groups: early group (LKW <6 h), middle group (LKW 6-16 h), and late group (LKW >16 h). The clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared among these three groups.

Results: Among 778 patients in the MT registry, 624 were enrolled. The early group included 432 patients, the middle group included 123 patients, and the late group included 69 patients. The patients had a median age of 77 years (interquartile range, 68-83), and 359 were male (57.5%). The median prehospital mRS score was 1 (interquartile range, 1-1), median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 17 (interquartile range, 10-23), and median Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was 10 (interquartile range, 8-10). Regarding safety and efficacy, the proportions of cases with successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3; 85.4% vs. 92.7% vs. 88.7%; p = 0.47), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (6.4% vs. 5.7% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.99), mRS score ≤3 at 90 days (52.0% vs. 60.2% vs. 44.9%; p = 0.11), and mRS score of 6 at 90 days (11.3% vs. 10.6 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.37) were not significantly different between the three groups.

Conclusion: Patients who received MT more than 16 h after LKW experienced the same safety and efficacy as those who received MT at 0-16 h after LKW. MT more than 16 h after LKW may be safe and effective for stroke patients with LVO.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大血管闭塞患者的机械血栓切除术治疗时间超过16小时。
引言:据报道,机械血栓切除术(MT)在最后一次已知(LKW)后24小时内有效,通过DAWN(DWI或CTP评估,对接受Trevo神经干预的苏醒期和晚期卒中进行临床不匹配)试验,在LKW后16小时内有效。然而,很少有关于LKW后超过16小时的MT的报道,并且LKW后24小时以上的MT的疗效和安全性尚未得到证实。我们评估了LKW后16小时以上MT的疗效和安全性。方法:使用2011年4月至2022年8月日本医学院医院MT登记处的数据,连续入选前循环大血管闭塞(LVO)和院前改良兰金量表(mRS)评分为0-3的患者。患者分为以下三组:早期组(LKW 16h)。比较这三组患者的临床特征和结果。结果:在MT登记的778名患者中,624人入选。早期组包括432名患者,中期组包括123名患者,晚期组包括69名患者。患者的中位年龄为77岁(四分位数范围,68-83),359人为男性(57.5%)。院前mRS评分的中位值为1(四分位范围,1-1),入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的中位数为17(四分位范围,10-23),阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期CT评分的中位数为10(四分之一范围,8-10)。关于安全性和有效性,成功再灌注的病例比例(改良脑梗死溶栓评分为2b-3;85.4%vs 92.7%vs 88.7%;P=.47)、症状性颅内出血(6.4%vs 5.7%vs 7.2%;P=.99)、90天mRS评分≤3(52.0%vs 60.2%vs 44.9%;P=.11),90天时mRS评分为6(11.3%vs10.6vs8.7%;P=.37),三组之间没有显著差异。结论:LKW后16h以上接受MT治疗的患者与LKW后0-16h接受MT治疗患者具有相同的安全性和有效性。LKW后超过16h的MT对伴有LVO的中风患者可能是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信