{"title":"Patients' Views on Medical Events in Lung Cancer Screening as Teachable Moments for Smoking Behaviour Change: A Systematic Review and Metasynthesis.","authors":"Anvita Vikram, Claire Muller, Lucy Hulme","doi":"10.1155/2023/6647364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although medical events in lung cancer screening (LCS) such as receiving scan results or interactions with clinicians are recognised as teachable moments (TMs), the views of patients about why this is the case for smoking behaviour change remain uncertain. This systematic review and metasynthesis study is aimed at identifying the reasons why patients believed that medical events during LCS act as TMs for smoking behaviour change. A search strategy was developed for use with MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL-P, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar. This helped identify qualitative and mixed-method research which mentioned patients' views of how these TMs result in smoking behaviour change. After screening, final articles were critically appraised; general characteristics and data relevant to the aims were extracted to conduct a line-of-argument metasynthesis. After screening 695 papers, 11 were included. Undergoing LCS scans was seen to act on their intrinsic motivation to reduce smoking as it served as a \"wake-up call\" and increased awareness of the health consequences of smoking. Receiving positive or negative LCS results resulted in cessation as it was a \"health scare\" and challenged smoking habits. Interactions with clinicians addressed misconceptions and signposted them to specialist cessation services. Attendees believed that the following encouraged them to change their smoking behaviour: having an intrinsic motivation to quit, their beliefs on smoking and health reframed, their negative emotions appraised, and using LCS to access specialist support. In line with the TM heuristic, these experiences provided the necessary skills, confidence, and motivation to quit. Future research should explore whether the views of the clinicians match those of the attendees to address misconceptions and further develop clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"2023 ","pages":"6647364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6647364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although medical events in lung cancer screening (LCS) such as receiving scan results or interactions with clinicians are recognised as teachable moments (TMs), the views of patients about why this is the case for smoking behaviour change remain uncertain. This systematic review and metasynthesis study is aimed at identifying the reasons why patients believed that medical events during LCS act as TMs for smoking behaviour change. A search strategy was developed for use with MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL-P, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar. This helped identify qualitative and mixed-method research which mentioned patients' views of how these TMs result in smoking behaviour change. After screening, final articles were critically appraised; general characteristics and data relevant to the aims were extracted to conduct a line-of-argument metasynthesis. After screening 695 papers, 11 were included. Undergoing LCS scans was seen to act on their intrinsic motivation to reduce smoking as it served as a "wake-up call" and increased awareness of the health consequences of smoking. Receiving positive or negative LCS results resulted in cessation as it was a "health scare" and challenged smoking habits. Interactions with clinicians addressed misconceptions and signposted them to specialist cessation services. Attendees believed that the following encouraged them to change their smoking behaviour: having an intrinsic motivation to quit, their beliefs on smoking and health reframed, their negative emotions appraised, and using LCS to access specialist support. In line with the TM heuristic, these experiences provided the necessary skills, confidence, and motivation to quit. Future research should explore whether the views of the clinicians match those of the attendees to address misconceptions and further develop clinical guidelines.
虽然肺癌筛查(LCS)中的医疗事件,如接收扫描结果或与临床医生的互动,被认为是教育时刻(TMs),但患者对吸烟行为改变的原因的看法仍然不确定。本系统综述和综合研究旨在确定患者认为LCS期间的医疗事件作为吸烟行为改变的TMs的原因。开发了与MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL-P, Web of Science数据库和Google Scholar一起使用的搜索策略。这有助于确定定性和混合方法的研究,这些研究提到了患者对这些TMs如何导致吸烟行为改变的看法。筛选后,对最终文章进行批判性评价;提取与目标相关的一般特征和数据,进行论证线综合。经过695篇论文的筛选,最终有11篇入选。接受LCS扫描被认为对他们减少吸烟的内在动机起作用,因为这是一个“警钟”,提高了人们对吸烟对健康后果的认识。接受阳性或阴性的LCS结果会导致戒烟,因为这是一种“健康恐慌”,并挑战吸烟习惯。与临床医生的互动解决了误解,并向他们介绍了专家戒烟服务。与会者认为,以下因素鼓励他们改变吸烟行为:拥有戒烟的内在动机、重新构建吸烟和健康观念、评估负面情绪,以及利用LCS获得专家支持。与冥想启发法一致,这些经历提供了必要的技能、信心和戒烟的动力。未来的研究应该探索临床医生的观点是否与与会者的观点相匹配,以解决误解并进一步制定临床指南。