Correlation between PSOGI pathological classification and survival outcomes of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated using cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: national referral centre experience and literature review.

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Lorena Martín-Román, Enda Hannan, Mohammad Faraz Khan, Anna Sophia Müller, Conor Shields, John Aird, Brendan Moran, Jurgen Mulsow
{"title":"Correlation between PSOGI pathological classification and survival outcomes of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei treated using cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: national referral centre experience and literature review.","authors":"Lorena Martín-Román,&nbsp;Enda Hannan,&nbsp;Mohammad Faraz Khan,&nbsp;Anna Sophia Müller,&nbsp;Conor Shields,&nbsp;John Aird,&nbsp;Brendan Moran,&nbsp;Jurgen Mulsow","doi":"10.1515/pp-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) consensus subdivided pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) into four groups according to histopathological features. The aim of this paper is to report survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) from a national referral centre and to correlate the PSOGI classification with survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Consecutive patients treated with CRS + HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin were included (September-2013 to December-2021). Pathological features of the peritoneal disease were used to classify patients into the four groups proposed by PSOGI. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of pathology on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 104 patients were identified; 29.6 % were reclassified as acellular mucin (AM), 43.9 % as low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), 22.4 % as high-grade MCP (HGMCP) and 4.1 % as HGMCP with signet ring cells (HGMCP-SRC). Median PCI and rate of optimal cytoreduction were 19 and 82.7 %, respectively. Median OS and DFS were not reached, 5-year OS and DFS were 88.6(SD 0.04) % and 61.6(SD 0.06) %, respectively. Log-Rank test revealed significant differences in terms of OS and DFS across the different histological subgroups (p<0.001 in both cases). However, histology did not retain its significance in the multivariate analysis for OS or DFS (p=0.932 and p=0.872, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Survival outcomes after CRS + HIPEC for PMP are excellent. The PSOGI pathological classification correlates with OS and DFS, but differences were not significant at multivariate analysis when adjusted for other prognostic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"8 2","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10249754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) consensus subdivided pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) into four groups according to histopathological features. The aim of this paper is to report survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) from a national referral centre and to correlate the PSOGI classification with survival.

Methods: A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database was performed. Consecutive patients treated with CRS + HIPEC for PMP of appendiceal origin were included (September-2013 to December-2021). Pathological features of the peritoneal disease were used to classify patients into the four groups proposed by PSOGI. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of pathology on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results: Overall, 104 patients were identified; 29.6 % were reclassified as acellular mucin (AM), 43.9 % as low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei (LGMCP), 22.4 % as high-grade MCP (HGMCP) and 4.1 % as HGMCP with signet ring cells (HGMCP-SRC). Median PCI and rate of optimal cytoreduction were 19 and 82.7 %, respectively. Median OS and DFS were not reached, 5-year OS and DFS were 88.6(SD 0.04) % and 61.6(SD 0.06) %, respectively. Log-Rank test revealed significant differences in terms of OS and DFS across the different histological subgroups (p<0.001 in both cases). However, histology did not retain its significance in the multivariate analysis for OS or DFS (p=0.932 and p=0.872, respectively).

Conclusions: Survival outcomes after CRS + HIPEC for PMP are excellent. The PSOGI pathological classification correlates with OS and DFS, but differences were not significant at multivariate analysis when adjusted for other prognostic factors.

Abstract Image

腹腔假性黏液瘤PSOGI病理分型与HIPEC治疗患者生存结局的相关性:国家转诊中心经验及文献综述。
目的:国际腹膜表面肿瘤组织(PSOGI)共识根据组织病理特征将腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)细分为四组。本文的目的是报告来自国家转诊中心的细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)后的生存结果,并将PSOGI分类与生存联系起来。方法:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性研究。纳入连续接受CRS + HIPEC治疗阑尾源性PMP的患者(2013年9月至2021年12月)。根据腹膜疾病的病理特征将患者分为PSOGI提出的四组。进行生存分析,评估病理与总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的相关性。结果:共发现104例患者;29.6% %为脱细胞粘蛋白(AM), 43.9% %为低级别黏液性腹膜癌(LGMCP), 22.4% %为高级别MCP (HGMCP), 4.1% %为伴印戒细胞的HGMCP (HGMCP- src)。中位PCI和最佳细胞减数率分别为19%和82.7 %。未达到中位OS和DFS, 5年OS和DFS分别为88.6(SD 0.04) %和61.6(SD 0.06) %。Log-Rank检验显示,不同组织学亚组的OS和DFS存在显著差异(结论:CRS + HIPEC治疗PMP后的生存结果非常好。PSOGI病理分类与OS和DFS相关,但在校正其他预后因素后,多因素分析差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信