Critical pathways for continuous quality improvement: a multicentric analysis on the management of patients with lung cancer in Italian best performing hospitals.

Q2 Medicine
Antonio Giulio DE Belvis, Maria Chiara Catalani, Alisha Morsella, Giorgio Sessa, Amelia Palinuro, Gabriele Giubbini, Florence Watteble, Carmen Angioletti
{"title":"Critical pathways for continuous quality improvement: a multicentric analysis on the management of patients with lung cancer in Italian best performing hospitals.","authors":"Antonio Giulio DE Belvis,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Catalani,&nbsp;Alisha Morsella,&nbsp;Giorgio Sessa,&nbsp;Amelia Palinuro,&nbsp;Gabriele Giubbini,&nbsp;Florence Watteble,&nbsp;Carmen Angioletti","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.1.1516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Critical pathways (CPs) are effective change management tools used to improve quality in healthcare nationally implemented in Italy in 2015. This study aims to map the country's state-of-the-art regarding the adoption of CPs and to verify the existence of factors that determine the success of their implementation and the relative entity of their impact, by analysing the management of Lung Cancer (LC) as a case-study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our methodology followed the SQUIRE guidelines for quality improvement reporting (2015). Starting from the 2017 ranking table published by the National Outcome Program, we selected and included in our sample all Italian hospitals who, according to Ministerial Decree n. 70/2015, met national quality threshold for LC treatment. To investigate regional-level and hospital-level factors believed to be responsible for the successful implementation of a CP, a Google Modules questionnaire was constructed and sent to the selected facilities; subsequently, a web-based research was carried out for missing data. Associations between variables were tested in STATA by means of correlation tests and a linear regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 hospitals matched our inclusion criteria. Of these, 68% defined an internal Lung Cancer Critical Pathway (LCCP). Our results confirmed the presence of critical success factors that favour the correct implementation of a LCCP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Notwithstanding the availability of CPs, their adoption in routine clinical practice still lacks consistency, suggesting the necessity to resort to digital solutions, to increment the level of regional commitment and workforce commitment and to reinforce quality standards monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":35174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/1a/jpmh-2023-01-e92.PMC10246618.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.1.1516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Critical pathways (CPs) are effective change management tools used to improve quality in healthcare nationally implemented in Italy in 2015. This study aims to map the country's state-of-the-art regarding the adoption of CPs and to verify the existence of factors that determine the success of their implementation and the relative entity of their impact, by analysing the management of Lung Cancer (LC) as a case-study.

Methods: Our methodology followed the SQUIRE guidelines for quality improvement reporting (2015). Starting from the 2017 ranking table published by the National Outcome Program, we selected and included in our sample all Italian hospitals who, according to Ministerial Decree n. 70/2015, met national quality threshold for LC treatment. To investigate regional-level and hospital-level factors believed to be responsible for the successful implementation of a CP, a Google Modules questionnaire was constructed and sent to the selected facilities; subsequently, a web-based research was carried out for missing data. Associations between variables were tested in STATA by means of correlation tests and a linear regression model.

Results: 41 hospitals matched our inclusion criteria. Of these, 68% defined an internal Lung Cancer Critical Pathway (LCCP). Our results confirmed the presence of critical success factors that favour the correct implementation of a LCCP.

Conclusions: Notwithstanding the availability of CPs, their adoption in routine clinical practice still lacks consistency, suggesting the necessity to resort to digital solutions, to increment the level of regional commitment and workforce commitment and to reinforce quality standards monitoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

持续质量改进的关键途径:对意大利最佳医院肺癌患者管理的多中心分析。
关键路径(CPs)是一种有效的变革管理工具,用于提高2015年在意大利实施的全国医疗保健质量。本研究旨在通过分析肺癌(LC)的管理作为一个案例研究,绘制该国关于采用cp的最先进技术的地图,并验证决定其实施成功的因素及其影响的相对实体的存在。方法:我们的方法遵循SQUIRE质量改进报告指南(2015年)。从国家成果计划公布的2017年排名表开始,我们选择并纳入了根据第70/2015号部长级法令满足LC治疗国家质量门槛的所有意大利医院。为了调查被认为对成功实施方案负责的区域一级和医院一级的因素,编制了一份谷歌模块调查表,并向选定的设施发送;随后,对缺失的数据进行了基于网络的研究。在STATA中,通过相关检验和线性回归模型检验变量之间的相关性。结果:41家医院符合我们的纳入标准。其中68%的患者定义了内部肺癌关键通路(LCCP)。我们的结果证实了有利于LCCP正确实施的关键成功因素的存在。结论:尽管有CPs,但其在常规临床实践中的采用仍然缺乏一致性,这表明有必要采用数字化解决方案,增加区域承诺和劳动力承诺的水平,并加强质量标准监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The journal is published on a four-monthly basis and covers the field of epidemiology and community health. The journal publishes original papers and proceedings of Symposia and/or Conferences which should be submitted in English. Papers are accepted on their originality and general interest. Ethical considerations will be taken into account.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信