Accuracy of CT angiography for detecting ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nomasonto N Mkhize, Victor Mngomezulu, Thandi E Buthelezi
{"title":"Accuracy of CT angiography for detecting ruptured intracranial aneurysms.","authors":"Nomasonto N Mkhize,&nbsp;Victor Mngomezulu,&nbsp;Thandi E Buthelezi","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is invasive, costly and unavailable in many South African hospitals; however, it remains the gold standard for imaging intracranial aneurysms. CT angiography (CTA) is a non-invasive and readily available screening tool prior to DSA.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CTA in detecting ruptured intracranial aneurysms using DSA as the reference standard and to determine the effect of aneurysm size and location on CTA sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis of CTA and DSA data from reports of patients suspected to have aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between January 2017 and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conventional DSA detected aneurysms in 94 out of 115 patients; while of these, CTA detected 75 and missed 19. The CTA sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 80%, 43% and 73%, respectively. The CTA sensitivity for aneurysms < 3 mm and 3 mm - 5 mm in size was 30% and 81.5%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.024). Sensitivity of CTA for posterior communicating artery (PComm) aneurysms was 56% and lower than other major anterior circulation locations (83% - 91%) (<i>p</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CTA diagnostic efficiency was lower than previously reported, with even lower sensitivity for aneurysms < 3 mm and for those arising from the PComm. Thus, CTA should remain a screening tool prior to DSA in all local patients suspected to have aneurysmal SAH.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>Larger, prospective studies are required to accurately define the role of CTA in diagnosing intracranial aneurysms in a developing country with limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"2636"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244944/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is invasive, costly and unavailable in many South African hospitals; however, it remains the gold standard for imaging intracranial aneurysms. CT angiography (CTA) is a non-invasive and readily available screening tool prior to DSA.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CTA in detecting ruptured intracranial aneurysms using DSA as the reference standard and to determine the effect of aneurysm size and location on CTA sensitivity.

Method: A retrospective analysis of CTA and DSA data from reports of patients suspected to have aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between January 2017 and June 2020.

Results: Conventional DSA detected aneurysms in 94 out of 115 patients; while of these, CTA detected 75 and missed 19. The CTA sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 80%, 43% and 73%, respectively. The CTA sensitivity for aneurysms < 3 mm and 3 mm - 5 mm in size was 30% and 81.5%, respectively (p = 0.024). Sensitivity of CTA for posterior communicating artery (PComm) aneurysms was 56% and lower than other major anterior circulation locations (83% - 91%) (p = 0.045).

Conclusion: The CTA diagnostic efficiency was lower than previously reported, with even lower sensitivity for aneurysms < 3 mm and for those arising from the PComm. Thus, CTA should remain a screening tool prior to DSA in all local patients suspected to have aneurysmal SAH.

Contribution: Larger, prospective studies are required to accurately define the role of CTA in diagnosing intracranial aneurysms in a developing country with limited resources.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CT血管造影检测颅内动脉瘤破裂的准确性。
背景:数字减影血管造影(DSA)是侵入性的,昂贵的,在许多南非医院无法获得;然而,它仍然是颅内动脉瘤成像的金标准。CT血管造影(CTA)是一种无创且易于获得的DSA前筛查工具。目的:本研究以DSA为参考标准,评价CTA对颅内破裂动脉瘤的诊断价值,探讨动脉瘤大小和位置对CTA敏感性的影响。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年6月Chris Hani Baragwanath学术医院疑似动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者的CTA和DSA数据。结果:115例患者中,常规DSA检出动脉瘤94例;其中,CTA检出75例,漏诊19例。CTA的敏感性为80%,特异性为43%,准确性为73%。< 3mm和3mm ~ 5mm动脉瘤的CTA敏感性分别为30%和81.5% (p = 0.024)。CTA对后交通动脉(PComm)动脉瘤的敏感性为56%,低于其他主要前循环部位(83% ~ 91%)(p = 0.045)。结论:CTA的诊断效率低于先前的报道,对于< 3mm的动脉瘤和源自PComm的动脉瘤的敏感性更低。因此,对于所有疑似动脉瘤性SAH的本地患者,CTA仍应作为DSA前的筛查工具。贡献:在资源有限的发展中国家,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来准确定义CTA在诊断颅内动脉瘤中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信