Telemedicine perceptions and experiences of socially vulnerable households during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220083
Alayne M Adams, Khandideh K A Williams, Jennifer C Langill, Mylene Arsenault, Isabelle Leblanc, Kimberly Munro, Jeannie Haggerty
{"title":"Telemedicine perceptions and experiences of socially vulnerable households during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.","authors":"Alayne M Adams,&nbsp;Khandideh K A Williams,&nbsp;Jennifer C Langill,&nbsp;Mylene Arsenault,&nbsp;Isabelle Leblanc,&nbsp;Kimberly Munro,&nbsp;Jeannie Haggerty","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts to decrease risk of viral transmission triggered an abrupt shift from ambulatory health care delivery toward telemedicine. In this study, we explore the perceptions and experiences of telemedicine among socially vulnerable households and suggest strategies to increase equity in telemedicine access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted between August 2020 and February 2021, this exploratory qualitative study involved in-depth interviews with members of socially vulnerable households needing health care. Participants were recruited from a food bank and primary care practice in Montréal. Digitally recorded telephone interviews focused on experiences and perceptions related to telemedicine access and use. In our thematic analysis, we employed the framework method to facilitate comparison, and the identification of patterns and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine participants were interviewed, 48% of whom presented as women. Almost all sought health care in the early stages of the pandemic, 69% of which was received via telemedicine. Four themes emerged from the analysis: delays in seeking health care owing to competing priorities and perceptions that COVID-19-related health care took precedence; challenges with appointment booking and logistics given complex online systems, administrative inefficiencies, long wait times and missed calls; issues around quality and continuity of care; and conditional acceptance of telemedicine for certain health problems, and in exceptional circumstances.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Early in the pandemic, participants report telemedicine delivery did not accommodate the diverse needs and capacities of socially vulnerable populations. Patient education, logistical support and care delivery by a trusted provider are suggested solutions, in addition to policies supporting digital equity and quality standards to promote telemedicine access and appropriate use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 2","pages":"E219-E226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/f4/cmajo.20220083.PMC10000894.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts to decrease risk of viral transmission triggered an abrupt shift from ambulatory health care delivery toward telemedicine. In this study, we explore the perceptions and experiences of telemedicine among socially vulnerable households and suggest strategies to increase equity in telemedicine access.

Methods: Conducted between August 2020 and February 2021, this exploratory qualitative study involved in-depth interviews with members of socially vulnerable households needing health care. Participants were recruited from a food bank and primary care practice in Montréal. Digitally recorded telephone interviews focused on experiences and perceptions related to telemedicine access and use. In our thematic analysis, we employed the framework method to facilitate comparison, and the identification of patterns and themes.

Results: Twenty-nine participants were interviewed, 48% of whom presented as women. Almost all sought health care in the early stages of the pandemic, 69% of which was received via telemedicine. Four themes emerged from the analysis: delays in seeking health care owing to competing priorities and perceptions that COVID-19-related health care took precedence; challenges with appointment booking and logistics given complex online systems, administrative inefficiencies, long wait times and missed calls; issues around quality and continuity of care; and conditional acceptance of telemedicine for certain health problems, and in exceptional circumstances.

Interpretation: Early in the pandemic, participants report telemedicine delivery did not accommodate the diverse needs and capacities of socially vulnerable populations. Patient education, logistical support and care delivery by a trusted provider are suggested solutions, in addition to policies supporting digital equity and quality standards to promote telemedicine access and appropriate use.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行早期阶段社会弱势家庭的远程医疗观念和经验:一项定性研究
背景:在COVID-19大流行早期,降低病毒传播风险的努力引发了从门诊医疗服务向远程医疗服务的突然转变。在本研究中,我们探讨了社会弱势家庭对远程医疗的看法和经验,并提出了提高远程医疗公平性的策略。方法:本探索性定性研究于2020年8月至2021年2月进行,对需要医疗保健的社会弱势家庭成员进行了深入访谈。参与者是从montracimal的一家食品银行和初级保健诊所招募的。数字记录的电话访谈侧重于与远程医疗获取和使用有关的经验和看法。在我们的主题分析中,我们采用了框架方法来方便比较,并识别模式和主题。结果:29名参与者接受了采访,其中48%以女性的身份出现。几乎所有人都在大流行的早期阶段寻求医疗保健,其中69%是通过远程医疗获得的。分析中出现了四个主题:由于优先事项相互竞争以及认为与covid -19相关的卫生保健优先,寻求医疗保健的延误;由于复杂的在线系统、行政效率低下、漫长的等待时间和未接电话,预约和物流面临挑战;围绕护理质量和连续性的问题;以及在特殊情况下,有条件地接受某些健康问题的远程医疗。解释:与会者报告说,在大流行初期,远程医疗服务未能满足社会弱势群体的各种需求和能力。除了支持数字公平和质量标准的政策以促进远程医疗的获取和适当使用之外,建议的解决方案还包括患者教育、后勤支持和由可信赖的提供者提供护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信